初级和社区护理研究急性中耳炎(COS-AOM)的核心结局。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Esther T van der Werf, Rachel Perry, Thomas Ostermann, Henrik Szőke, Alyson L Huntley
{"title":"初级和社区护理研究急性中耳炎(COS-AOM)的核心结局。","authors":"Esther T van der Werf, Rachel Perry, Thomas Ostermann, Henrik Szőke, Alyson L Huntley","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02821-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Outcome heterogeneity reported in Acute Otitis Media (AOM) research hinders evidence accumulation. Identification of a Core Outcome Set (COS) to report on in future studies in AOM is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1: Candidate outcomes identification by reviewing previously reported outcomes in systematic reviews of AOM. Phase 2: In a Parent and Public Involvement (PPI) meeting candidate outcomes were discussed on their importance, presence, and absence. Phase 3: The clinical perspective of health professionals and pharmacists was anonymously gained through a ranking task. Phase 4: An International Steering Committee (ISC) discussed the ranked outcomes and advised on the final COS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 candidate outcomes were identified from 3 reviews and summarised to 20 overarching outcomes in Phase 1. Eight parents participated in the PPI meeting. 28 participants (11 GPs, 11 Traditional Complementary and Integrative medicine (TCIM) Professionals, 6 Pharmacists) ranked the 20 outcome cards. Moderate agreement in ranking was reached within all 3 medical groups, with pharmacists showing the highest agreement (0.540) and the TCIM professionals the lowest (0.421). Correlation coefficients between the groups show a sufficiently high agreement (P < 0.01). The ICS confirmed the final COS-AOM including 8 acute outcomes and 2 mid-long-term outcomes. Agreement for each outcome was reached with 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed COS defines a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in primary care and community studies on AOM, including TCIM clinical trials, to enhance evidence-based knowledge. Future research should focus on validating commonly used measurement tools for these outcomes and enhancing findings' generalisability beyond the UK, Europe and primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A core outcome set for acute otitis media (COS-AOM) for primary and community care studies.\",\"authors\":\"Esther T van der Werf, Rachel Perry, Thomas Ostermann, Henrik Szőke, Alyson L Huntley\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02821-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Outcome heterogeneity reported in Acute Otitis Media (AOM) research hinders evidence accumulation. Identification of a Core Outcome Set (COS) to report on in future studies in AOM is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1: Candidate outcomes identification by reviewing previously reported outcomes in systematic reviews of AOM. Phase 2: In a Parent and Public Involvement (PPI) meeting candidate outcomes were discussed on their importance, presence, and absence. Phase 3: The clinical perspective of health professionals and pharmacists was anonymously gained through a ranking task. Phase 4: An International Steering Committee (ISC) discussed the ranked outcomes and advised on the final COS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 candidate outcomes were identified from 3 reviews and summarised to 20 overarching outcomes in Phase 1. Eight parents participated in the PPI meeting. 28 participants (11 GPs, 11 Traditional Complementary and Integrative medicine (TCIM) Professionals, 6 Pharmacists) ranked the 20 outcome cards. Moderate agreement in ranking was reached within all 3 medical groups, with pharmacists showing the highest agreement (0.540) and the TCIM professionals the lowest (0.421). Correlation coefficients between the groups show a sufficiently high agreement (P < 0.01). The ICS confirmed the final COS-AOM including 8 acute outcomes and 2 mid-long-term outcomes. Agreement for each outcome was reached with 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed COS defines a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in primary care and community studies on AOM, including TCIM clinical trials, to enhance evidence-based knowledge. Future research should focus on validating commonly used measurement tools for these outcomes and enhancing findings' generalisability beyond the UK, Europe and primary care settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02821-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02821-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:急性中耳炎(AOM)研究结果的异质性阻碍了证据的积累。确定一个核心结果集(COS),以便在未来的AOM研究中报告。方法:第一阶段:通过回顾AOM系统评价中先前报道的结果来确定候选结果。阶段2:在家长和公众参与(PPI)会议上,讨论候选结果的重要性、存在和不存在。第三阶段:通过匿名排序任务获得卫生专业人员和药剂师的临床观点。第四阶段:国际指导委员会(ISC)讨论排名结果,并就最终COS提供建议。结果:从3次回顾中确定了51个候选结果,并总结为1期的20个总体结果。8位家长参加了本次PPI会议。28名参与者(11名全科医生、11名传统补充和中西医结合专业人员、6名药剂师)对20张结果卡进行了排名。3个医疗组别的排名一致程度中等,其中药师的一致性最高(0.540),TCIM专业人员的一致性最低(0.421)。结论:拟议的COS定义了在AOM的初级保健和社区研究(包括TCIM临床试验)中测量和报告的最低结果集,以增强基于证据的知识。未来的研究应侧重于验证这些结果的常用测量工具,并提高研究结果在英国、欧洲和初级保健机构以外的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A core outcome set for acute otitis media (COS-AOM) for primary and community care studies.

Background and objective: Outcome heterogeneity reported in Acute Otitis Media (AOM) research hinders evidence accumulation. Identification of a Core Outcome Set (COS) to report on in future studies in AOM is warranted.

Methods: Phase 1: Candidate outcomes identification by reviewing previously reported outcomes in systematic reviews of AOM. Phase 2: In a Parent and Public Involvement (PPI) meeting candidate outcomes were discussed on their importance, presence, and absence. Phase 3: The clinical perspective of health professionals and pharmacists was anonymously gained through a ranking task. Phase 4: An International Steering Committee (ISC) discussed the ranked outcomes and advised on the final COS.

Results: 51 candidate outcomes were identified from 3 reviews and summarised to 20 overarching outcomes in Phase 1. Eight parents participated in the PPI meeting. 28 participants (11 GPs, 11 Traditional Complementary and Integrative medicine (TCIM) Professionals, 6 Pharmacists) ranked the 20 outcome cards. Moderate agreement in ranking was reached within all 3 medical groups, with pharmacists showing the highest agreement (0.540) and the TCIM professionals the lowest (0.421). Correlation coefficients between the groups show a sufficiently high agreement (P < 0.01). The ICS confirmed the final COS-AOM including 8 acute outcomes and 2 mid-long-term outcomes. Agreement for each outcome was reached with 100%.

Conclusion: The proposed COS defines a minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported in primary care and community studies on AOM, including TCIM clinical trials, to enhance evidence-based knowledge. Future research should focus on validating commonly used measurement tools for these outcomes and enhancing findings' generalisability beyond the UK, Europe and primary care settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信