Alison M Brown, Sophie Nock, Kathryn Musgrave, Amanda J Unsworth
{"title":"血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)作为癌症相关静脉血栓形成的生物标志物:荟萃分析","authors":"Alison M Brown, Sophie Nock, Kathryn Musgrave, Amanda J Unsworth","doi":"10.1055/a-2513-4381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer-associated thrombosis affects between 1 and 20% of all patients diagnosed with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and a poorer prognosis. Risk assessment scores exist which include the measurement of biomarkers, and which aim to identify patients at a higher risk of developing thrombotic events, but these are poor predictors and rarely used in routine clinical practice. VEGF is a potent angiogenic factor, produced by tumour cells, and released by platelets and is essential for tumour growth and progression. It also plays a role in the promotion of thrombosis through platelet activation and adhesion, and by inducing the expression of tissue factor. Therefore, the potential of VEGF to be used as a biomarker to predict cancer-associated thrombosis requires further investigation. This study reviewed the published literature to determine whether circulating VEGF levels are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. PubMed and OVID databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for relevant papers using the keywords \"cancer\" AND \"thrombosis\" AND \"VEGF\" up to July 2023. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Seven papers (1,528 participants) were identified and included in the meta-analysis, three of which (922 participants) measured VEGF before a thrombotic event, and the remaining four (606 participants) measured VEGF at the time of the thrombosis. Our results showed that although plasma and serum VEGF tended to be higher in those who subsequently developed thrombosis than those who did not (mean difference 70.2 pg/mL for serum, and 11.44 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI -2.39-25.73, <i>p</i> = 0.10), this was not found to be statistically significant. However, analysis of VEGF following blood sampling at the time of thrombosis showed a stronger statistically significant association between increased VEGF levels and presence of thrombosis (mean difference 117.02 pg/mL for serum, and 116.6 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI 55.42-190.82, <i>p</i> = 0.0004). Based on current studies, whilst it is increased at the time of thrombosis, VEGF is not effective as a predictive biomarker of CAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":"9 ","pages":"a25134381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) as a Biomarker for Cancer-Associated Venous Thrombosis: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alison M Brown, Sophie Nock, Kathryn Musgrave, Amanda J Unsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2513-4381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer-associated thrombosis affects between 1 and 20% of all patients diagnosed with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and a poorer prognosis. Risk assessment scores exist which include the measurement of biomarkers, and which aim to identify patients at a higher risk of developing thrombotic events, but these are poor predictors and rarely used in routine clinical practice. VEGF is a potent angiogenic factor, produced by tumour cells, and released by platelets and is essential for tumour growth and progression. It also plays a role in the promotion of thrombosis through platelet activation and adhesion, and by inducing the expression of tissue factor. Therefore, the potential of VEGF to be used as a biomarker to predict cancer-associated thrombosis requires further investigation. This study reviewed the published literature to determine whether circulating VEGF levels are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. PubMed and OVID databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for relevant papers using the keywords \\\"cancer\\\" AND \\\"thrombosis\\\" AND \\\"VEGF\\\" up to July 2023. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Seven papers (1,528 participants) were identified and included in the meta-analysis, three of which (922 participants) measured VEGF before a thrombotic event, and the remaining four (606 participants) measured VEGF at the time of the thrombosis. Our results showed that although plasma and serum VEGF tended to be higher in those who subsequently developed thrombosis than those who did not (mean difference 70.2 pg/mL for serum, and 11.44 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI -2.39-25.73, <i>p</i> = 0.10), this was not found to be statistically significant. However, analysis of VEGF following blood sampling at the time of thrombosis showed a stronger statistically significant association between increased VEGF levels and presence of thrombosis (mean difference 117.02 pg/mL for serum, and 116.6 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI 55.42-190.82, <i>p</i> = 0.0004). Based on current studies, whilst it is increased at the time of thrombosis, VEGF is not effective as a predictive biomarker of CAT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"a25134381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2513-4381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2513-4381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
癌症相关血栓在所有确诊癌症患者中占1%至20%,并与显著的发病率和较差的预后相关。现有的风险评估评分包括生物标志物的测量,其目的是识别血栓形成事件风险较高的患者,但这些是较差的预测指标,很少用于常规临床实践。VEGF是一种有效的血管生成因子,由肿瘤细胞产生,由血小板释放,对肿瘤的生长和进展至关重要。它还通过活化血小板和粘附,以及诱导组织因子的表达来促进血栓形成。因此,VEGF作为预测癌症相关血栓形成的生物标志物的潜力有待进一步研究。本研究回顾了已发表的文献,以确定循环血管内皮生长因子水平是否与癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞风险增加有关。根据PRISMA指南系统检索PubMed和OVID数据库中截至2023年7月的相关论文,检索关键词为“cancer”、“thrombosis”和“VEGF”。采用纳入和排除标准。7篇论文(1528名参与者)被纳入meta分析,其中3篇(922名参与者)在血栓形成事件发生前测量了VEGF,其余4篇(606名参与者)在血栓形成时测量了VEGF。我们的研究结果显示,尽管随后发生血栓的患者血浆和血清VEGF倾向于高于未发生血栓的患者(血清平均差异为70.2 pg/mL,血浆VEGF平均差异为11.44 pg/mL, 95% CI为-2.39-25.73,p = 0.10),但这没有统计学意义。然而,血栓形成时采血后的VEGF分析显示,VEGF水平升高与血栓形成之间存在更强的统计学意义相关性(血清平均差异为117.02 pg/mL,血浆平均差异为116.6 pg/mL, 95% CI 55.42-190.82, p = 0.0004)。根据目前的研究,虽然VEGF在血栓形成时升高,但它并不能有效地作为CAT的预测性生物标志物。
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) as a Biomarker for Cancer-Associated Venous Thrombosis: A Meta-analysis.
Cancer-associated thrombosis affects between 1 and 20% of all patients diagnosed with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and a poorer prognosis. Risk assessment scores exist which include the measurement of biomarkers, and which aim to identify patients at a higher risk of developing thrombotic events, but these are poor predictors and rarely used in routine clinical practice. VEGF is a potent angiogenic factor, produced by tumour cells, and released by platelets and is essential for tumour growth and progression. It also plays a role in the promotion of thrombosis through platelet activation and adhesion, and by inducing the expression of tissue factor. Therefore, the potential of VEGF to be used as a biomarker to predict cancer-associated thrombosis requires further investigation. This study reviewed the published literature to determine whether circulating VEGF levels are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. PubMed and OVID databases were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for relevant papers using the keywords "cancer" AND "thrombosis" AND "VEGF" up to July 2023. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Seven papers (1,528 participants) were identified and included in the meta-analysis, three of which (922 participants) measured VEGF before a thrombotic event, and the remaining four (606 participants) measured VEGF at the time of the thrombosis. Our results showed that although plasma and serum VEGF tended to be higher in those who subsequently developed thrombosis than those who did not (mean difference 70.2 pg/mL for serum, and 11.44 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI -2.39-25.73, p = 0.10), this was not found to be statistically significant. However, analysis of VEGF following blood sampling at the time of thrombosis showed a stronger statistically significant association between increased VEGF levels and presence of thrombosis (mean difference 117.02 pg/mL for serum, and 116.6 pg/mL for plasma VEGF, 95% CI 55.42-190.82, p = 0.0004). Based on current studies, whilst it is increased at the time of thrombosis, VEGF is not effective as a predictive biomarker of CAT.