经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的隐蔽性失血。

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lu Tang, Huai Zhang, Yun Yang, Hua-Qiang Huang
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的隐蔽性失血。","authors":"Lu Tang, Huai Zhang, Yun Yang, Hua-Qiang Huang","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and to compare the HBL between unilateral extrapedicular approach and unilateral transpedicular approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2022 to February 2023, a total of 136 patients (49 males, 87 females; mean age: 76.4±9.5 years; range, 55 to 100 years) with thoracolumbar OVCFs treated with PVP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent unilateral transpedicular approach were divided into Group A (n=62) and patients who underwent unilateral extrapedicular approach were divided into Group B (n=74). Demographic results and clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. The HBL was calculated according to the Sehat formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operation duration was 31.7±9.9 min in Group A and 29.1±11.1 in Group B, indicating no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.159). The mean volume of bone cement instilled was 4.4±0.4 mL in Group A and 4.7±0.6 mL in Group B. The volume of cement injected in Group A was less than that of Group B (p=0.001). The mean hemoglobin loss and the amount of HBL were significantly lower in Group A than Group B (p=0.001 and p=0.040, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that perioperative HBL cannot be ignored in PVP for thoracolumbar OVCFs, regardless of the surgical approach chosen. We should be more concerned about anemia in patients with thoracolumbar OVCFs after unilateral extrapedicular approach compared to the unilateral transpedicular approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"36 2","pages":"240-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hidden blood loss of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Tang, Huai Zhang, Yun Yang, Hua-Qiang Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and to compare the HBL between unilateral extrapedicular approach and unilateral transpedicular approach.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between February 2022 to February 2023, a total of 136 patients (49 males, 87 females; mean age: 76.4±9.5 years; range, 55 to 100 years) with thoracolumbar OVCFs treated with PVP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent unilateral transpedicular approach were divided into Group A (n=62) and patients who underwent unilateral extrapedicular approach were divided into Group B (n=74). Demographic results and clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. The HBL was calculated according to the Sehat formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operation duration was 31.7±9.9 min in Group A and 29.1±11.1 in Group B, indicating no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.159). The mean volume of bone cement instilled was 4.4±0.4 mL in Group A and 4.7±0.6 mL in Group B. The volume of cement injected in Group A was less than that of Group B (p=0.001). The mean hemoglobin loss and the amount of HBL were significantly lower in Group A than Group B (p=0.001 and p=0.040, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results suggest that perioperative HBL cannot be ignored in PVP for thoracolumbar OVCFs, regardless of the surgical approach chosen. We should be more concerned about anemia in patients with thoracolumbar OVCFs after unilateral extrapedicular approach compared to the unilateral transpedicular approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"240-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)患者的隐性失血量(HBL),并比较单侧椎弓根外入路和单侧椎弓根经入路的隐性失血量。患者与方法:2022年2月至2023年2月,共136例患者(男49例,女87例;平均年龄:76.4±9.5岁;回顾性分析了PVP治疗胸腰椎OVCFs患者的年龄(55 - 100岁)。单侧经椎弓根入路患者分为A组(n=62),单侧椎弓根外入路患者分为B组(n=74)。收集两组患者的人口学结果和临床资料进行比较。根据Sehat公式计算HBL。结果:A组平均手术时间为31.7±9.9 min, B组平均手术时间为29.1±11.1 min,两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.159)。A组平均骨水泥注入量为4.4±0.4 mL, B组平均骨水泥注入量为4.7±0.6 mL, A组骨水泥注入量小于B组(p=0.001)。A组平均血红蛋白损失和HBL量显著低于B组(p=0.001和p=0.040)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,无论选择何种手术入路,围手术期HBL在胸腰椎OVCFs PVP中都不可忽视。与单侧经椎弓根入路相比,我们更应该关注胸腰椎OVCFs患者单侧椎弓根外入路后贫血的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hidden blood loss of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and to compare the HBL between unilateral extrapedicular approach and unilateral transpedicular approach.

Patients and methods: Between February 2022 to February 2023, a total of 136 patients (49 males, 87 females; mean age: 76.4±9.5 years; range, 55 to 100 years) with thoracolumbar OVCFs treated with PVP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent unilateral transpedicular approach were divided into Group A (n=62) and patients who underwent unilateral extrapedicular approach were divided into Group B (n=74). Demographic results and clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. The HBL was calculated according to the Sehat formula.

Results: The mean operation duration was 31.7±9.9 min in Group A and 29.1±11.1 in Group B, indicating no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.159). The mean volume of bone cement instilled was 4.4±0.4 mL in Group A and 4.7±0.6 mL in Group B. The volume of cement injected in Group A was less than that of Group B (p=0.001). The mean hemoglobin loss and the amount of HBL were significantly lower in Group A than Group B (p=0.001 and p=0.040, respectively).

Conclusion: Our study results suggest that perioperative HBL cannot be ignored in PVP for thoracolumbar OVCFs, regardless of the surgical approach chosen. We should be more concerned about anemia in patients with thoracolumbar OVCFs after unilateral extrapedicular approach compared to the unilateral transpedicular approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信