痴呆患者胆囊炎治疗及预后

Rachel R Adler, Lingwei Xiang, Samir K Shah, Clancy J Clark, Zara Cooper, John Hsu, Stuart R Lipsitz, Joel S Weissman, Emily Finlayson
{"title":"痴呆患者胆囊炎治疗及预后","authors":"Rachel R Adler, Lingwei Xiang, Samir K Shah, Clancy J Clark, Zara Cooper, John Hsu, Stuart R Lipsitz, Joel S Weissman, Emily Finlayson","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholecystectomy is considered the definitive treatment option for cholecystitis, but the effect of different treatment options among people living with dementia (PLWD) has not been elucidated. This study compares outcomes following cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy tube, and medical management of cholecystitis among this high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020. The cohort comprised Medicare PLWD aged 66+ admitted to acute care facilities with a new primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. We used inverse propensity weighting regression to adjust for confounding by indication. We compared outcomes during index admission, readmissions, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand and seven hundred and seventy four individuals met inclusion criteria; 7% open cholecystectomy, 49% minimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomy, 13% cholecystostomy tube, 31% managed medically. After adjustment, PLWD undergoing open or MIS cholecystectomy had a greater risk of intensive interventions (Open OR 3.3, p < 0.001; MIS OR 1.3, p = 0.02) and surgical complications (Open OR 10.6, p < 0.001; MIS OR 3.3, p < 0.001) during the index admission, but a lower risk of readmission (Open HR 0.9, p = 0.009; MIS HR 0.9, p < 0.001) and lower mortality (Open HR 0.6, p < 0.001; MIS 0.6, p < 0.001) compared with PLWD managed medically. PLWD managed with cholecystostomy tube had no difference in intensive interventions or surgical complications during the index admission, but a higher risk of readmission (HR 1.1, p = 0.01), cholecystectomy during readmission (HR 1.8, p < 0.001) and no difference in mortality compared to those managed medically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of PLWD experiencing acute cholecystitis received definitive surgical treatment during the index admission. Open and MIS cholecystectomy were associated with worse outcomes during the index admission, but reduced mortality and readmissions in the 2 years following index admission. Cholecystostomy tube was associated with a greater likelihood of readmission and subsequent cholecystectomy, and no difference in mortality. These findings should be interpreted within the context of administrative data, which has the potential for selection bias and unmeasured confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cholecystitis Treatment and Outcomes Among People Living With Dementia.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel R Adler, Lingwei Xiang, Samir K Shah, Clancy J Clark, Zara Cooper, John Hsu, Stuart R Lipsitz, Joel S Weissman, Emily Finlayson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholecystectomy is considered the definitive treatment option for cholecystitis, but the effect of different treatment options among people living with dementia (PLWD) has not been elucidated. This study compares outcomes following cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy tube, and medical management of cholecystitis among this high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020. The cohort comprised Medicare PLWD aged 66+ admitted to acute care facilities with a new primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. We used inverse propensity weighting regression to adjust for confounding by indication. We compared outcomes during index admission, readmissions, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand and seven hundred and seventy four individuals met inclusion criteria; 7% open cholecystectomy, 49% minimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomy, 13% cholecystostomy tube, 31% managed medically. After adjustment, PLWD undergoing open or MIS cholecystectomy had a greater risk of intensive interventions (Open OR 3.3, p < 0.001; MIS OR 1.3, p = 0.02) and surgical complications (Open OR 10.6, p < 0.001; MIS OR 3.3, p < 0.001) during the index admission, but a lower risk of readmission (Open HR 0.9, p = 0.009; MIS HR 0.9, p < 0.001) and lower mortality (Open HR 0.6, p < 0.001; MIS 0.6, p < 0.001) compared with PLWD managed medically. PLWD managed with cholecystostomy tube had no difference in intensive interventions or surgical complications during the index admission, but a higher risk of readmission (HR 1.1, p = 0.01), cholecystectomy during readmission (HR 1.8, p < 0.001) and no difference in mortality compared to those managed medically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over half of PLWD experiencing acute cholecystitis received definitive surgical treatment during the index admission. Open and MIS cholecystectomy were associated with worse outcomes during the index admission, but reduced mortality and readmissions in the 2 years following index admission. Cholecystostomy tube was associated with a greater likelihood of readmission and subsequent cholecystectomy, and no difference in mortality. These findings should be interpreted within the context of administrative data, which has the potential for selection bias and unmeasured confounding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19487\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胆囊切除术被认为是胆囊炎的最终治疗方案,但不同治疗方案对痴呆患者(PLWD)的影响尚未阐明。本研究比较了这一高危人群胆囊切除术、胆囊造瘘管和胆囊炎医疗管理后的结果。方法:对2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日的医疗保险索赔数据进行回顾性分析。该队列包括66岁以上的医疗保险PLWD,入院急性护理设施,新的初步诊断为胆囊炎。我们使用逆倾向加权回归来调整适应症的混淆。我们比较了指数入院、再入院和死亡率的结果。结果:88774人符合纳入标准;7%为开腹胆囊切除术,49%为微创胆囊切除术,13%为胆囊造瘘管切除术,31%为药物治疗。调整后,接受开放或MIS胆囊切除术的PLWD患者接受强化干预的风险更大(open or 3.3, p)。结论:超过一半的急性胆囊炎PLWD患者在入院期间接受了明确的手术治疗。开放胆囊切除术和MIS胆囊切除术与指数入院时较差的预后相关,但在指数入院后2年内死亡率和再入院率降低。胆囊造瘘管与再入院和随后胆囊切除术的可能性较大相关,死亡率无差异。这些发现应该在行政数据的背景下进行解释,这可能存在选择偏差和未测量的混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cholecystitis Treatment and Outcomes Among People Living With Dementia.

Background: Cholecystectomy is considered the definitive treatment option for cholecystitis, but the effect of different treatment options among people living with dementia (PLWD) has not been elucidated. This study compares outcomes following cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy tube, and medical management of cholecystitis among this high-risk group.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020. The cohort comprised Medicare PLWD aged 66+ admitted to acute care facilities with a new primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. We used inverse propensity weighting regression to adjust for confounding by indication. We compared outcomes during index admission, readmissions, and mortality.

Results: Eight thousand and seven hundred and seventy four individuals met inclusion criteria; 7% open cholecystectomy, 49% minimally invasive (MIS) cholecystectomy, 13% cholecystostomy tube, 31% managed medically. After adjustment, PLWD undergoing open or MIS cholecystectomy had a greater risk of intensive interventions (Open OR 3.3, p < 0.001; MIS OR 1.3, p = 0.02) and surgical complications (Open OR 10.6, p < 0.001; MIS OR 3.3, p < 0.001) during the index admission, but a lower risk of readmission (Open HR 0.9, p = 0.009; MIS HR 0.9, p < 0.001) and lower mortality (Open HR 0.6, p < 0.001; MIS 0.6, p < 0.001) compared with PLWD managed medically. PLWD managed with cholecystostomy tube had no difference in intensive interventions or surgical complications during the index admission, but a higher risk of readmission (HR 1.1, p = 0.01), cholecystectomy during readmission (HR 1.8, p < 0.001) and no difference in mortality compared to those managed medically.

Conclusions: Over half of PLWD experiencing acute cholecystitis received definitive surgical treatment during the index admission. Open and MIS cholecystectomy were associated with worse outcomes during the index admission, but reduced mortality and readmissions in the 2 years following index admission. Cholecystostomy tube was associated with a greater likelihood of readmission and subsequent cholecystectomy, and no difference in mortality. These findings should be interpreted within the context of administrative data, which has the potential for selection bias and unmeasured confounding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信