{"title":"对智力和神经发育障碍以及具有挑战性行为的个体进行牙科护理的药理学方法和身体约束:对患者和护理人员经验的范围审查。","authors":"A Camoin, D Faulks","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological approaches and physical restraint in dental care for individuals with intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"A Camoin, D Faulks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacological approaches and physical restraint in dental care for individuals with intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experiences.
Purpose: There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.
Results: From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.
Conclusion: The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.
期刊介绍:
The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.