对智力和神经发育障碍以及具有挑战性行为的个体进行牙科护理的药理学方法和身体约束:对患者和护理人员经验的范围审查。

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
A Camoin, D Faulks
{"title":"对智力和神经发育障碍以及具有挑战性行为的个体进行牙科护理的药理学方法和身体约束:对患者和护理人员经验的范围审查。","authors":"A Camoin, D Faulks","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological approaches and physical restraint in dental care for individuals with intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"A Camoin, D Faulks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01041-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在治疗具有挑战性行为和智力和神经发育障碍的患者的从业人员中,关于使用药理学和物理牙科行为支持技术存在争议和辩论。然而,患者和护理人员的经验仍未得到充分探索。本综述旨在确定智力和神经发育障碍患者和具有挑战性行为的患者及其护理人员在牙科护理期间使用物理和药理学程序的经验。方法:使用所有主要医学数据库进行范围审查,纳入定量和定性研究设计的证据,以澄清概念并确定文献中的空白。结果:从1575份筛选记录中,纳入了13项研究。其中10项是定量或混合方法研究,侧重于从照顾者的角度接受行为支持技术,特别是对有特殊需要的儿童。七项研究来自美洲,没有一项来自欧洲或非洲。出现了两个主要主题:同意的有效性;以及父母和看护人对不同牙科行为支持技术的接受程度。结论:家长和照顾者最能接受的技术是非侵入性的、基于行为的支持技术。当这些方法失败时,物理支持技术似乎比药物方法(镇静或全身麻醉)更可接受,尽管这可能与文化背景和/或缺乏财政支持有关。没有研究报告了患者对行为支持技术的看法,因此无法得出结论,从患者的角度来看,哪些技术是可以接受的。进一步的定性研究对于探索有特殊牙科护理需求的患者的经验和期望是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacological approaches and physical restraint in dental care for individuals with intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities and challenging behaviour: a scoping review of patients' and caregivers' experiences.

Purpose: There is controversy and debate around the use of pharmacological and physical dental behaviour support techniques amongst practitioners treating patients with challenging behaviour and intellectual and neurodevelopmental disabilities. However, the experiences of patients and caregivers remain underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify the experience of patients with intellectual and neurodevelopemental disabilities and challenging behaviour and their caregivers regarding the use of physical and pharmacological procedures during dental care.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted, incorporating evidence from both quantitative and qualitative study designs to clarify concepts and identify gaps in the literature, using all the main medical databases.

Results: From 1575 screened records, 13 studies were included. Ten were quantitative or mixed-method studies focusing on the acceptance of behaviour support techniques from the caregiver's perspective, particularly for children with special needs. Seven studies were from the Americas, none from Europe or Africa. Two major themes emerged: validity of consent; and the acceptance of different dental behaviour support techniques by parents and caregivers.

Conclusion: The most acceptable techniques for parents and caregivers were non-invasive, behaviour based support techniques. When these failed, physical support techniques seemed to be more acceptable than pharmacological approaches (sedation or general anaesthesia), although this may be related to cultural context and/or lack of financial support. No studies reported the patient perspective of behaviour support techniques so no conclusions can be drawn as to which techniques are acceptable from the patient's point of view. Further qualitative studies are essential to explore the experiences and expectations of patients with special dental care needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信