Clinton F Pillow, Carey Brewbaker, Bethany J Wolf, William Barrett, Erik Hansen, Andrew Brown, Dylan Crawford, Sylvia H Wilson
{"title":"甲哌卡因与布比卡因脊柱麻醉对全膝关节置换术后运动功能恢复的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Clinton F Pillow, Carey Brewbaker, Bethany J Wolf, William Barrett, Erik Hansen, Andrew Brown, Dylan Crawford, Sylvia H Wilson","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Demand for same-day discharge pathways and early ambulation following knee arthroplasty continues to increase. While spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine versus bupivacaine may promote return of motor function and ambulation, there are limited randomized trials evaluating this in knee arthroplasty patients. This study hypothesized that spinal mepivacaine would result in earlier return of motor function, promoting ambulation and same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (n=163) were enrolled and randomized patients to mepivacaine (60 mg) or isobaric bupivacaine (10 mg) for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was time to return of motor function. Additional outcomes included time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving a mepivacaine spinal anesthetic had faster median (95% CI) time to return of motor function, (210 min (200, 216) vs 229 (223, 237) min, p<0.001) and lower rates of urinary retention (36% vs 57%, p=0.007). Mepivacaine patients exhibited higher pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (32.4 vs 9.5 mm, p<0.001) but no differences at 6, 24, or 48 hours postoperative. Opioid consumption did not differ at any time point (p=0.769). There were no differences in time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or transient neurological symptoms between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mepivacaine expedited return of motor function after knee arthroplasty, a clinically relevant 20% reduction was not observed. Ambulation times and same-day discharge rates did not differ.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05765682.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mepivacaine versus bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for return of motor function following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Clinton F Pillow, Carey Brewbaker, Bethany J Wolf, William Barrett, Erik Hansen, Andrew Brown, Dylan Crawford, Sylvia H Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-106342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Demand for same-day discharge pathways and early ambulation following knee arthroplasty continues to increase. While spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine versus bupivacaine may promote return of motor function and ambulation, there are limited randomized trials evaluating this in knee arthroplasty patients. This study hypothesized that spinal mepivacaine would result in earlier return of motor function, promoting ambulation and same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (n=163) were enrolled and randomized patients to mepivacaine (60 mg) or isobaric bupivacaine (10 mg) for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was time to return of motor function. Additional outcomes included time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving a mepivacaine spinal anesthetic had faster median (95% CI) time to return of motor function, (210 min (200, 216) vs 229 (223, 237) min, p<0.001) and lower rates of urinary retention (36% vs 57%, p=0.007). Mepivacaine patients exhibited higher pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (32.4 vs 9.5 mm, p<0.001) but no differences at 6, 24, or 48 hours postoperative. Opioid consumption did not differ at any time point (p=0.769). There were no differences in time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or transient neurological symptoms between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although mepivacaine expedited return of motor function after knee arthroplasty, a clinically relevant 20% reduction was not observed. Ambulation times and same-day discharge rates did not differ.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05765682.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106342\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mepivacaine versus bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for return of motor function following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Demand for same-day discharge pathways and early ambulation following knee arthroplasty continues to increase. While spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine versus bupivacaine may promote return of motor function and ambulation, there are limited randomized trials evaluating this in knee arthroplasty patients. This study hypothesized that spinal mepivacaine would result in earlier return of motor function, promoting ambulation and same-day discharge.
Methods: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (n=163) were enrolled and randomized patients to mepivacaine (60 mg) or isobaric bupivacaine (10 mg) for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was time to return of motor function. Additional outcomes included time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and side effects.
Results: Patients receiving a mepivacaine spinal anesthetic had faster median (95% CI) time to return of motor function, (210 min (200, 216) vs 229 (223, 237) min, p<0.001) and lower rates of urinary retention (36% vs 57%, p=0.007). Mepivacaine patients exhibited higher pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (32.4 vs 9.5 mm, p<0.001) but no differences at 6, 24, or 48 hours postoperative. Opioid consumption did not differ at any time point (p=0.769). There were no differences in time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or transient neurological symptoms between groups.
Conclusions: Although mepivacaine expedited return of motor function after knee arthroplasty, a clinically relevant 20% reduction was not observed. Ambulation times and same-day discharge rates did not differ.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).