急性跟腱断裂修复术后并发症:微创与开放技术的生存分析。

IF 2.2
Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1177/10711007251333777
Joris R H Hendriks, Siddhartha Sharma, Matthias Peiffer, Tom M de Groot, Gregory Waryasz, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher W DiGiovanni, Daniel Guss
{"title":"急性跟腱断裂修复术后并发症:微创与开放技术的生存分析。","authors":"Joris R H Hendriks, Siddhartha Sharma, Matthias Peiffer, Tom M de Groot, Gregory Waryasz, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher W DiGiovanni, Daniel Guss","doi":"10.1177/10711007251333777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complication rates after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) using open repair or minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) have been debated extensively. Despite significant research, a literature hiatus exists on the timing of these complications between techniques. In this study, we aimed to address this gap by conducting a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the incidence and timing of complications after open vs MIS repair of acute ATRs and examine associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients ≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment of an acute ATR within 28 days of injury and had a minimum of 90-day follow-up. Demographics, surgical technique (open vs MIS repair), and the occurrence and timing of postoperative complications were collected. Postoperative complications were classified as venous thromboembolism, rerupture, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury. A Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to compare the complication rates between groups. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, out of 417 patients, 52 complications were reported in 50 patients. We found no significant difference in the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of rerupture (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.4) and that surgical delay increased the risk of wound dehiscence (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.3) and sural nerve injury (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS and open repair techniques for acute ATRs demonstrate comparable complication rates. However, patients with elevated BMI exhibit a modest increased risk of rerupture, regardless of the technique used. Those with surgical delay beyond 2 weeks are also modestly more likely to experience wound dehiscence with open surgical approach and sural nerve injury among MIS-treated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"707-714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Joris R H Hendriks, Siddhartha Sharma, Matthias Peiffer, Tom M de Groot, Gregory Waryasz, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani, Christopher W DiGiovanni, Daniel Guss\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251333777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complication rates after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) using open repair or minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) have been debated extensively. Despite significant research, a literature hiatus exists on the timing of these complications between techniques. In this study, we aimed to address this gap by conducting a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the incidence and timing of complications after open vs MIS repair of acute ATRs and examine associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients ≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment of an acute ATR within 28 days of injury and had a minimum of 90-day follow-up. Demographics, surgical technique (open vs MIS repair), and the occurrence and timing of postoperative complications were collected. Postoperative complications were classified as venous thromboembolism, rerupture, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury. A Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to compare the complication rates between groups. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, out of 417 patients, 52 complications were reported in 50 patients. We found no significant difference in the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of rerupture (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.4) and that surgical delay increased the risk of wound dehiscence (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.3) and sural nerve injury (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIS and open repair techniques for acute ATRs demonstrate comparable complication rates. However, patients with elevated BMI exhibit a modest increased risk of rerupture, regardless of the technique used. Those with surgical delay beyond 2 weeks are also modestly more likely to experience wound dehiscence with open surgical approach and sural nerve injury among MIS-treated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"707-714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12227820/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251333777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251333777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性跟腱断裂(ATRs)手术修复后采用开放式修复或微创手术技术(MIS)的并发症发生率一直有广泛的争论。尽管有重要的研究,但关于这些技术之间并发症的时间存在文献空白。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过Kaplan-Meier生存分析来比较急性ATRs开放式和MIS修复后并发症的发生率和时间,并检查相关的危险因素,从而解决这一差距。方法:本回顾性研究纳入≥18岁的急性ATR患者,这些患者在损伤后28天内接受了手术治疗,随访时间至少为90天。收集人口统计学、手术技术(开放与MIS修复)、术后并发症的发生和时间。术后并发症分为静脉血栓栓塞、再破裂、手术部位感染、创面裂开、腓肠神经损伤。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较两组间并发症发生率。采用log-rank检验幸存者函数是否相等。采用Cox比例风险模型确定并发症的预测因素。结果:417例患者中,50例出现52例并发症。我们发现MIS组和开放式修复组的并发症发生率无显著差异。Cox比例风险模型显示,BMI是再破裂的重要预测因子(HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.4),手术延迟增加了伤口裂开(HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.3)和腓肠神经损伤(HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3)的风险。结论:MIS和开放式修复技术治疗急性atr的并发症发生率相当。然而,无论采用何种技术,BMI升高的患者再破裂的风险都会适度增加。在miss治疗的患者中,手术延迟超过2周的患者也更容易出现开放性手术入路伤口裂开和腓肠神经损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.

Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.

Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.

Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.

Background: The complication rates after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) using open repair or minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS) have been debated extensively. Despite significant research, a literature hiatus exists on the timing of these complications between techniques. In this study, we aimed to address this gap by conducting a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the incidence and timing of complications after open vs MIS repair of acute ATRs and examine associated risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients ≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment of an acute ATR within 28 days of injury and had a minimum of 90-day follow-up. Demographics, surgical technique (open vs MIS repair), and the occurrence and timing of postoperative complications were collected. Postoperative complications were classified as venous thromboembolism, rerupture, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury. A Kaplan-Meier curve was employed to compare the complication rates between groups. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine predictors of complications.

Results: In total, out of 417 patients, 52 complications were reported in 50 patients. We found no significant difference in the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of rerupture (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05-1.4) and that surgical delay increased the risk of wound dehiscence (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.3) and sural nerve injury (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3).

Conclusion: MIS and open repair techniques for acute ATRs demonstrate comparable complication rates. However, patients with elevated BMI exhibit a modest increased risk of rerupture, regardless of the technique used. Those with surgical delay beyond 2 weeks are also modestly more likely to experience wound dehiscence with open surgical approach and sural nerve injury among MIS-treated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信