职场基因检测:公司网站对联邦隐私和反歧视法有何看法?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Betty Cohn, Anya E R Prince, Katherine Callahan, J Scott Roberts, Alyx Vogle, Debra J H Mathews
{"title":"职场基因检测:公司网站对联邦隐私和反歧视法有何看法?","authors":"Betty Cohn, Anya E R Prince, Katherine Callahan, J Scott Roberts, Alyx Vogle, Debra J H Mathews","doi":"10.1159/000546189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Employees considering participation in workplace genetic and/or genomic testing (wGT) as part of workplace wellness programs should be aware of legal protections of their personal genetic information. Given the relevance of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) for informed decision making, employers offering wGT should ideally inform employees of these health policies prior to collecting any genetic data. It is unclear, however, whether and to what extent such information is being provided. Company websites provide one important resource for making employees-and the public at large-aware of important health policies governing workplace wellness programs in general, and wGT services in particular.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed the websites of 420 companies (including 140 privately-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest privately-held companies, 140 publicly-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest publicly-held companies, 104 hospitals/hospital systems, and 36 companies that had evidence that they offer/have offered wGT) offering wGT services to determine if they included reference to HIPAA and GINA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search for wGT programs on company websites found that 50 of 420 companies had evidence of offering wGT. We found 32/50 (64%) mentions of HIPAA and no mentions of GINA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is imperative that HIPAA and GINA are upheld by both vendors and employers. Accessible and understandable information on these policies is needed for employees to analyze the benefits and risks of participating in wGT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace genomic testing: What do company websites say about federal privacy and anti-discrimination laws?\",\"authors\":\"Betty Cohn, Anya E R Prince, Katherine Callahan, J Scott Roberts, Alyx Vogle, Debra J H Mathews\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Employees considering participation in workplace genetic and/or genomic testing (wGT) as part of workplace wellness programs should be aware of legal protections of their personal genetic information. Given the relevance of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) for informed decision making, employers offering wGT should ideally inform employees of these health policies prior to collecting any genetic data. It is unclear, however, whether and to what extent such information is being provided. Company websites provide one important resource for making employees-and the public at large-aware of important health policies governing workplace wellness programs in general, and wGT services in particular.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically reviewed the websites of 420 companies (including 140 privately-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest privately-held companies, 140 publicly-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest publicly-held companies, 104 hospitals/hospital systems, and 36 companies that had evidence that they offer/have offered wGT) offering wGT services to determine if they included reference to HIPAA and GINA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search for wGT programs on company websites found that 50 of 420 companies had evidence of offering wGT. We found 32/50 (64%) mentions of HIPAA and no mentions of GINA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is imperative that HIPAA and GINA are upheld by both vendors and employers. Accessible and understandable information on these policies is needed for employees to analyze the benefits and risks of participating in wGT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:考虑参加工作场所基因和/或基因组测试(wGT)作为工作场所健康计划的一部分的员工应该意识到他们的个人基因信息的法律保护。鉴于《健康保险携带与责任法案》(HIPAA)和《基因信息非歧视法案》(GINA)与知情决策的相关性,提供wGT的雇主最好在收集任何基因数据之前告知员工这些健康政策。然而,目前尚不清楚是否以及在何种程度上提供了这种资料。公司网站提供了一个重要的资源,让员工和公众意识到管理工作场所健康计划的重要健康政策,尤其是wGT服务。方法:我们系统地审查了420家提供wGT服务的公司(包括2019年福布斯最大私营控股公司名单中的140家私营公司,2019年福布斯最大上市公司名单中的140家上市公司,104家医院/医院系统,以及36家有证据表明他们提供/已经提供wGT的公司)的网站,以确定他们是否包含HIPAA和GINA的参考。结果:我们在公司网站上搜索wGT项目,发现420家公司中有50家有提供wGT的证据。我们发现32/50(64%)提到了HIPAA,没有提到GINA。结论:供应商和雇主都必须支持HIPAA和GINA。为了让员工分析参与wGT的好处和风险,需要提供这些政策的可访问和可理解的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace genomic testing: What do company websites say about federal privacy and anti-discrimination laws?

Introduction: Employees considering participation in workplace genetic and/or genomic testing (wGT) as part of workplace wellness programs should be aware of legal protections of their personal genetic information. Given the relevance of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) for informed decision making, employers offering wGT should ideally inform employees of these health policies prior to collecting any genetic data. It is unclear, however, whether and to what extent such information is being provided. Company websites provide one important resource for making employees-and the public at large-aware of important health policies governing workplace wellness programs in general, and wGT services in particular.

Method: We systematically reviewed the websites of 420 companies (including 140 privately-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest privately-held companies, 140 publicly-held companies from the 2019 Forbes list of largest publicly-held companies, 104 hospitals/hospital systems, and 36 companies that had evidence that they offer/have offered wGT) offering wGT services to determine if they included reference to HIPAA and GINA.

Results: Our search for wGT programs on company websites found that 50 of 420 companies had evidence of offering wGT. We found 32/50 (64%) mentions of HIPAA and no mentions of GINA.

Conclusions: It is imperative that HIPAA and GINA are upheld by both vendors and employers. Accessible and understandable information on these policies is needed for employees to analyze the benefits and risks of participating in wGT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信