应对临床实践中的道德挑战:坦桑尼亚三家医院临床伦理支持需求的定性评估。

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Shija Kevin Kuhumba, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Nandera Ernest Mhando, Bert A C Molewijk
{"title":"应对临床实践中的道德挑战:坦桑尼亚三家医院临床伦理支持需求的定性评估。","authors":"Shija Kevin Kuhumba, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Nandera Ernest Mhando, Bert A C Molewijk","doi":"10.1007/s10730-025-09547-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare professionals (HCPs) encounter various moral challenges in clinical practice. In various countries, clinical ethics support (CES) services are developed to support HCPs. One of these CES services is clinical ethics committees (CECs): they address moral challenges faced in healthcare settings and offer support for HCPs. However, in Tanzania, CECs have not yet been implemented. For implementation purposes, greater knowledge about how healthcare professionals navigate and respond to moral challenges, their understanding of CECs, and what they perceive as key needs for implementing CECs in hospitals, are valuable. This study explores HCPs' ways of dealing with their moral challenges at the moment and identifies key needs for establishing CECs in Tanzanian healthcare settings in the near future. The findings show that various implicit ways have been acknowledged as being useful in addressing moral challenges (e.g., regular meetings, family conferences, social welfare units, hospital procedures and guidelines, as well as consulting legal and management units). In addition, HCPs reported that a necessity exists for implementing more formal and systematic modalities to address moral challenges in clinical settings. The research in this paper has served as a preparation for establishing the first CEC in Tanzanian healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responding to Moral Challenges in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinical Ethics Support Needs at Three Tanzanian Hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Shija Kevin Kuhumba, Trygve Johannes Lereim Sævareid, Nandera Ernest Mhando, Bert A C Molewijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10730-025-09547-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare professionals (HCPs) encounter various moral challenges in clinical practice. In various countries, clinical ethics support (CES) services are developed to support HCPs. One of these CES services is clinical ethics committees (CECs): they address moral challenges faced in healthcare settings and offer support for HCPs. However, in Tanzania, CECs have not yet been implemented. For implementation purposes, greater knowledge about how healthcare professionals navigate and respond to moral challenges, their understanding of CECs, and what they perceive as key needs for implementing CECs in hospitals, are valuable. This study explores HCPs' ways of dealing with their moral challenges at the moment and identifies key needs for establishing CECs in Tanzanian healthcare settings in the near future. The findings show that various implicit ways have been acknowledged as being useful in addressing moral challenges (e.g., regular meetings, family conferences, social welfare units, hospital procedures and guidelines, as well as consulting legal and management units). In addition, HCPs reported that a necessity exists for implementing more formal and systematic modalities to address moral challenges in clinical settings. The research in this paper has served as a preparation for establishing the first CEC in Tanzanian healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hec Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hec Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09547-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09547-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在临床实践中遇到各种道德挑战。在许多国家,临床伦理支持(CES)服务被开发来支持医疗保健提供者。临床伦理委员会(CECs)是这些服务之一:它们解决医疗保健环境中面临的道德挑战,并为hcp提供支持。但是,在坦桑尼亚,cec尚未得到执行。就实施目的而言,更多地了解医疗保健专业人员如何应对道德挑战、他们对CECs的理解以及他们认为在医院实施CECs的关键需求是有价值的。本研究探讨了卫生保健提供者目前应对道德挑战的方式,并确定了在不久的将来在坦桑尼亚卫生保健环境中建立CECs的关键需求。调查结果表明,人们认为各种隐性方式在应对道德挑战方面是有用的(例如,定期会议、家庭会议、社会福利单位、医院程序和准则,以及咨询法律和管理单位)。此外,HCPs报告说,有必要实施更正式和系统的模式来解决临床环境中的道德挑战。本文中的研究已作为在坦桑尼亚卫生保健环境中建立第一个CEC的准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responding to Moral Challenges in Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinical Ethics Support Needs at Three Tanzanian Hospitals.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) encounter various moral challenges in clinical practice. In various countries, clinical ethics support (CES) services are developed to support HCPs. One of these CES services is clinical ethics committees (CECs): they address moral challenges faced in healthcare settings and offer support for HCPs. However, in Tanzania, CECs have not yet been implemented. For implementation purposes, greater knowledge about how healthcare professionals navigate and respond to moral challenges, their understanding of CECs, and what they perceive as key needs for implementing CECs in hospitals, are valuable. This study explores HCPs' ways of dealing with their moral challenges at the moment and identifies key needs for establishing CECs in Tanzanian healthcare settings in the near future. The findings show that various implicit ways have been acknowledged as being useful in addressing moral challenges (e.g., regular meetings, family conferences, social welfare units, hospital procedures and guidelines, as well as consulting legal and management units). In addition, HCPs reported that a necessity exists for implementing more formal and systematic modalities to address moral challenges in clinical settings. The research in this paper has served as a preparation for establishing the first CEC in Tanzanian healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信