评估非神经科学护士认证的价值。

Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang
{"title":"评估非神经科学护士认证的价值。","authors":"Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND : Nurses who obtain voluntary specialty certification have higher levels of perceived value for certification compared with noncertified nurses. By identifying and fostering the lesser held perceived values, peers and organizations may increase the overall perceived value of certification among noncertified neuroscience nurses, which, in turn, could lead to higher certification attainment. METHODS : This was a cross-sectional descriptive exploratory design after a survey completed by noncertified neuroscience nurses. Certified neuroscience (CNRN) and stroke certified registered nurses (SCRN) were used as a comparison group. The nurses reported the benefits of certification using the Perceived Value of Certification Tool 12. Logistic regression was used to determine the presence of significant differences in value statement responses among the 2 groups. Percentage of agreement with the value statements among noncertified nurses was also reported. RESULTS : A total of 338 noncertified neuroscience nurses completed the survey. Participants reported a mean age of 44.7 years, and 88% were female. About 68% of participants were White/Non-Hispanic. Among the 12 value statements, noncertified neuroscience nurses reported the highest levels of agreement with statements related to validation of knowledge, personal accomplishment, and commitment to neuroscience nursing. The lowest levels of agreement were associated with being listened to, professional autonomy, and higher pay. Logistic regression demonstrated that certified neuroscience nurses (n = 640) had significant higher levels of agreement with 8 of the 12 value statements compared with noncertified neuroscience nurses . CONCLUSION : Support for certification among neuroscience nurses cannot rely upon 1 source. Although hospitals and professional organizations play a significant role, peer support from certified neuroscience nurses is needed for fostering the value of certification. Further research using open-ended questions to provide detail regarding noncertificant responses to the 8 value statements may provide additional insight needed to strategize certification achievement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":"57 3","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Value of Certification Among Noncertified Neuroscience Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND : Nurses who obtain voluntary specialty certification have higher levels of perceived value for certification compared with noncertified nurses. By identifying and fostering the lesser held perceived values, peers and organizations may increase the overall perceived value of certification among noncertified neuroscience nurses, which, in turn, could lead to higher certification attainment. METHODS : This was a cross-sectional descriptive exploratory design after a survey completed by noncertified neuroscience nurses. Certified neuroscience (CNRN) and stroke certified registered nurses (SCRN) were used as a comparison group. The nurses reported the benefits of certification using the Perceived Value of Certification Tool 12. Logistic regression was used to determine the presence of significant differences in value statement responses among the 2 groups. Percentage of agreement with the value statements among noncertified nurses was also reported. RESULTS : A total of 338 noncertified neuroscience nurses completed the survey. Participants reported a mean age of 44.7 years, and 88% were female. About 68% of participants were White/Non-Hispanic. Among the 12 value statements, noncertified neuroscience nurses reported the highest levels of agreement with statements related to validation of knowledge, personal accomplishment, and commitment to neuroscience nursing. The lowest levels of agreement were associated with being listened to, professional autonomy, and higher pay. Logistic regression demonstrated that certified neuroscience nurses (n = 640) had significant higher levels of agreement with 8 of the 12 value statements compared with noncertified neuroscience nurses . CONCLUSION : Support for certification among neuroscience nurses cannot rely upon 1 source. Although hospitals and professional organizations play a significant role, peer support from certified neuroscience nurses is needed for fostering the value of certification. Further research using open-ended questions to provide detail regarding noncertificant responses to the 8 value statements may provide additional insight needed to strategize certification achievement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"132-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:背景:获得自愿专科认证的护士对认证的感知价值水平高于未获得认证的护士。通过识别和培养较少持有的感知价值,同行和组织可能会增加未获得认证的神经科学护士的认证整体感知价值,这反过来又可能导致更高的认证成就。方法:这是一项横断面描述性探索性设计,由非认证神经科学护士完成调查。以神经科学注册护士(CNRN)和脑卒中注册护士(SCRN)为对照组。护士使用认证工具的感知价值12报告了认证的好处。使用逻辑回归来确定两组之间价值陈述反应是否存在显著差异。非持证护士同意价值陈述的百分比也被报道。结果:共有338名非持证神经科学护士完成了调查。参与者的平均年龄为44.7岁,其中88%为女性。大约68%的参与者是白人/非西班牙裔。在12个价值陈述中,非认证神经科学护士报告了与知识验证、个人成就和神经科学护理承诺相关的陈述的最高一致性。最低程度的同意与被倾听、职业自主权和更高的薪水有关。逻辑回归显示,与未注册神经科学护士相比,注册神经科学护士(n = 640)对12个价值陈述中的8个具有显著更高的一致性。结论:神经科学护士对认证的支持不能只依赖于一个来源。虽然医院和专业组织发挥着重要作用,但需要获得认证的神经科学护士的同行支持,以促进认证的价值。使用开放式问题进行进一步的研究,以提供有关非认证人员对8个价值陈述的回应的详细信息,这可能为制定认证成就战略提供额外的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Value of Certification Among Noncertified Neuroscience Nurses.

Abstract: BACKGROUND : Nurses who obtain voluntary specialty certification have higher levels of perceived value for certification compared with noncertified nurses. By identifying and fostering the lesser held perceived values, peers and organizations may increase the overall perceived value of certification among noncertified neuroscience nurses, which, in turn, could lead to higher certification attainment. METHODS : This was a cross-sectional descriptive exploratory design after a survey completed by noncertified neuroscience nurses. Certified neuroscience (CNRN) and stroke certified registered nurses (SCRN) were used as a comparison group. The nurses reported the benefits of certification using the Perceived Value of Certification Tool 12. Logistic regression was used to determine the presence of significant differences in value statement responses among the 2 groups. Percentage of agreement with the value statements among noncertified nurses was also reported. RESULTS : A total of 338 noncertified neuroscience nurses completed the survey. Participants reported a mean age of 44.7 years, and 88% were female. About 68% of participants were White/Non-Hispanic. Among the 12 value statements, noncertified neuroscience nurses reported the highest levels of agreement with statements related to validation of knowledge, personal accomplishment, and commitment to neuroscience nursing. The lowest levels of agreement were associated with being listened to, professional autonomy, and higher pay. Logistic regression demonstrated that certified neuroscience nurses (n = 640) had significant higher levels of agreement with 8 of the 12 value statements compared with noncertified neuroscience nurses . CONCLUSION : Support for certification among neuroscience nurses cannot rely upon 1 source. Although hospitals and professional organizations play a significant role, peer support from certified neuroscience nurses is needed for fostering the value of certification. Further research using open-ended questions to provide detail regarding noncertificant responses to the 8 value statements may provide additional insight needed to strategize certification achievement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信