乳腺癌:基于体素内不相干运动的栖息地成像预测新辅助化疗的病理完全反应。

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1002/mp.17813
Hui Zhang, Yunyan Zheng, Mingzhe Zhang, Ailing Wang, Yang Song, Chenglong Wang, Guang Yang, Mingping Ma, Muzhen He
{"title":"乳腺癌:基于体素内不相干运动的栖息地成像预测新辅助化疗的病理完全反应。","authors":"Hui Zhang, Yunyan Zheng, Mingzhe Zhang, Ailing Wang, Yang Song, Chenglong Wang, Guang Yang, Mingping Ma, Muzhen He","doi":"10.1002/mp.17813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiomics research based on whole tumors is limited by the unclear biological significance of radiomics features, which therefore lack clinical interpretability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to determine whether features extracted from subregions defined by habitat imaging, reflecting tumor heterogeneity, could identify breast cancer patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to optimize treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>143 women with stage II-III breast cancer were divided into a training set (100 patients, 36 with pathologic complete response [pCR]) and a test set (43 patients, 16 with pCR). Patients underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before NAC. With the pathological results as the gold standard, we used the training set to build models for predicting pCR based on whole-tumor radiomics (Model<sub>WH</sub>), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based habitat imaging (Model<sub>Habitats</sub>), conventional MRI features (Model<sub>CF</sub>), and immunohistochemical findings (Model<sub>IHC</sub>). We also built the combined models Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub>. In the test set, we compared the performance of the combined models with that of the invasive Model<sub>IHC</sub> by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of the model. The DeLong test was used to compare diagnostic efficiency across different parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prediction of pCR, Model<sub>WH</sub>, Model<sub>Habitats</sub>, Model<sub>CF</sub>, Model<sub>IHC</sub>, Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub>, Model<sub>CF+IHC</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> achieved AUCs of 0.895, 0.757, 0.705, 0.807, 0.800, 0.856, and 0.891 respectively, in the training set and 0.549, 0.708, 0.700, 0.788, 0.745, 0.909, and 0.891 respectively, in the test set. The DeLong test revealed no significant difference between Model<sub>IHC</sub> versus Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub> (p = 0.695) and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> versus Model<sub>CF+IHC</sub> (p = 0.382) but showed a significant difference between Model<sub>IHC</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> (p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The habitat model we established from first-order features combined with conventional MRI features and IHC findings accurately predicted pCR before NAC. This model can facilitate decision-making during individualized treatment for breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Cancer: Habitat imaging based on intravoxel incoherent motion for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhang, Yunyan Zheng, Mingzhe Zhang, Ailing Wang, Yang Song, Chenglong Wang, Guang Yang, Mingping Ma, Muzhen He\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiomics research based on whole tumors is limited by the unclear biological significance of radiomics features, which therefore lack clinical interpretability.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to determine whether features extracted from subregions defined by habitat imaging, reflecting tumor heterogeneity, could identify breast cancer patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to optimize treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>143 women with stage II-III breast cancer were divided into a training set (100 patients, 36 with pathologic complete response [pCR]) and a test set (43 patients, 16 with pCR). Patients underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before NAC. With the pathological results as the gold standard, we used the training set to build models for predicting pCR based on whole-tumor radiomics (Model<sub>WH</sub>), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based habitat imaging (Model<sub>Habitats</sub>), conventional MRI features (Model<sub>CF</sub>), and immunohistochemical findings (Model<sub>IHC</sub>). We also built the combined models Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub>. In the test set, we compared the performance of the combined models with that of the invasive Model<sub>IHC</sub> by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of the model. The DeLong test was used to compare diagnostic efficiency across different parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prediction of pCR, Model<sub>WH</sub>, Model<sub>Habitats</sub>, Model<sub>CF</sub>, Model<sub>IHC</sub>, Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub>, Model<sub>CF+IHC</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> achieved AUCs of 0.895, 0.757, 0.705, 0.807, 0.800, 0.856, and 0.891 respectively, in the training set and 0.549, 0.708, 0.700, 0.788, 0.745, 0.909, and 0.891 respectively, in the test set. The DeLong test revealed no significant difference between Model<sub>IHC</sub> versus Model<sub>Habitats+CF</sub> (p = 0.695) and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> versus Model<sub>CF+IHC</sub> (p = 0.382) but showed a significant difference between Model<sub>IHC</sub> and Model<sub>Habitats+CF+IHC</sub> (p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The habitat model we established from first-order features combined with conventional MRI features and IHC findings accurately predicted pCR before NAC. This model can facilitate decision-making during individualized treatment for breast cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于全肿瘤的放射组学研究受到放射组学特征生物学意义不明确的限制,因此缺乏临床可解释性。目的:我们旨在确定从栖息地成像定义的亚区提取的特征,反映肿瘤异质性,是否可以识别将受益于新辅助化疗(NAC)的乳腺癌患者,以优化治疗。方法:将143例II-III期乳腺癌患者分为训练组(100例,病理完全缓解[pCR] 36例)和测试组(43例,pCR 16例)。患者在NAC前行3-T磁共振成像(MRI)检查。以病理结果为金标准,我们使用训练集建立基于全肿瘤放射组学(ModelWH)、基于体素内非相干运动(IVIM)的栖息地成像(ModelHabitats)、常规MRI特征(ModelCF)和免疫组织化学结果(modelhc)的预测pCR模型。我们还构建了ModelHabitats+CF和ModelHabitats+CF+IHC组合模型。在测试集中,我们通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和决策曲线分析(DCA),比较了联合模型与有创ModelIHC的性能。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价模型的预测价值。DeLong试验用于比较不同参数下的诊断效率。结果:在pCR预测中,ModelWH、ModelHabitats、ModelCF、modeldelihc、ModelHabitats+CF、ModelCF+IHC和ModelHabitats+CF+IHC的auc值在训练集中分别为0.895、0.757、0.705、0.807、0.800、0.856、0.891,在测试集中分别为0.549、0.708、0.700、0.788、0.745、0.909、0.891。DeLong检验显示ModelIHC与ModelHabitats+CF之间无显著差异(p = 0.695), ModelHabitats+CF+IHC与ModelCF+IHC之间无显著差异(p = 0.382),但ModelIHC与ModelHabitats+CF+IHC之间有显著差异(p = 0.043)。结论:利用一阶特征结合常规MRI特征和免疫组化结果建立的栖息地模型能准确预测NAC前的pCR。该模型有助于乳腺癌个体化治疗的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast Cancer: Habitat imaging based on intravoxel incoherent motion for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: Radiomics research based on whole tumors is limited by the unclear biological significance of radiomics features, which therefore lack clinical interpretability.

Purpose: We aimed to determine whether features extracted from subregions defined by habitat imaging, reflecting tumor heterogeneity, could identify breast cancer patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to optimize treatment.

Methods: 143 women with stage II-III breast cancer were divided into a training set (100 patients, 36 with pathologic complete response [pCR]) and a test set (43 patients, 16 with pCR). Patients underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before NAC. With the pathological results as the gold standard, we used the training set to build models for predicting pCR based on whole-tumor radiomics (ModelWH), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-based habitat imaging (ModelHabitats), conventional MRI features (ModelCF), and immunohistochemical findings (ModelIHC). We also built the combined models ModelHabitats+CF and ModelHabitats+CF+IHC. In the test set, we compared the performance of the combined models with that of the invasive ModelIHC by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of the model. The DeLong test was used to compare diagnostic efficiency across different parameters.

Results: In the prediction of pCR, ModelWH, ModelHabitats, ModelCF, ModelIHC, ModelHabitats+CF, ModelCF+IHC and ModelHabitats+CF+IHC achieved AUCs of 0.895, 0.757, 0.705, 0.807, 0.800, 0.856, and 0.891 respectively, in the training set and 0.549, 0.708, 0.700, 0.788, 0.745, 0.909, and 0.891 respectively, in the test set. The DeLong test revealed no significant difference between ModelIHC versus ModelHabitats+CF (p = 0.695) and ModelHabitats+CF+IHC versus ModelCF+IHC (p = 0.382) but showed a significant difference between ModelIHC and ModelHabitats+CF+IHC (p = 0.043).

Conclusion: The habitat model we established from first-order features combined with conventional MRI features and IHC findings accurately predicted pCR before NAC. This model can facilitate decision-making during individualized treatment for breast cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信