渐冻症患者气管造口通气:医疗从业者对生活质量和决策意义的看法。

IF 2.8
Nicola Turner, Jonathan Palmer, Christina Faull, Scott Davidson, Martin R Turner, Eleanor Wilson
{"title":"渐冻症患者气管造口通气:医疗从业者对生活质量和决策意义的看法。","authors":"Nicola Turner, Jonathan Palmer, Christina Faull, Scott Davidson, Martin R Turner, Eleanor Wilson","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2495014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding of how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) perceive quality of life for people with ALS who use tracheostomy ventilation (TV) and the extent to which such views inform discussions regarding future treatment and care. <i>Methods:</i> A thematic analysis was applied to data derived from online semi-structured interviews with a professionally diverse group of 24 HCPs with experience of supporting people with ALS to use TV. <i>Results:</i> Four main themes relating to TV use emerged: i) <i>Positive benefits</i>; ii) <i>Risks and challenges</i>; iii) <i>Factors influencing HCP perspectives</i>; iv) <i>Concepts informing HCP discussions.</i> HCPs acknowledged that TV has the potential to extend life but were concerned with prolonging a serious decline in physical and cognitive functioning. HCPs tried to identify the 'tipping point' between quantity and quality of life for the individual and their family, taking into account the likelihood of a higher burden of care. HCPs drew on prior experience to assess anticipated quality of life, yet most HCPs in the UK have limited experience of TV for this group. HCPs also drew on principles of person-centered care, patient autonomy and value for money to guide their approach to discussing TV. <i>Conclusions:</i> HCP experience of positive outcomes of TV can foster a more proactive approach to initiating conversations about its potential use. Sharing best practice and improving guidance for HCPs may support early and on-going future care planning and enable people with ALS to make choices which are informed and in their best interests.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"444-451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracheostomy ventilation in ALS: healthcare practitioner perspectives on quality of life and implications for decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Turner, Jonathan Palmer, Christina Faull, Scott Davidson, Martin R Turner, Eleanor Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678421.2025.2495014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives:</i> This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding of how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) perceive quality of life for people with ALS who use tracheostomy ventilation (TV) and the extent to which such views inform discussions regarding future treatment and care. <i>Methods:</i> A thematic analysis was applied to data derived from online semi-structured interviews with a professionally diverse group of 24 HCPs with experience of supporting people with ALS to use TV. <i>Results:</i> Four main themes relating to TV use emerged: i) <i>Positive benefits</i>; ii) <i>Risks and challenges</i>; iii) <i>Factors influencing HCP perspectives</i>; iv) <i>Concepts informing HCP discussions.</i> HCPs acknowledged that TV has the potential to extend life but were concerned with prolonging a serious decline in physical and cognitive functioning. HCPs tried to identify the 'tipping point' between quantity and quality of life for the individual and their family, taking into account the likelihood of a higher burden of care. HCPs drew on prior experience to assess anticipated quality of life, yet most HCPs in the UK have limited experience of TV for this group. HCPs also drew on principles of person-centered care, patient autonomy and value for money to guide their approach to discussing TV. <i>Conclusions:</i> HCP experience of positive outcomes of TV can foster a more proactive approach to initiating conversations about its potential use. Sharing best practice and improving guidance for HCPs may support early and on-going future care planning and enable people with ALS to make choices which are informed and in their best interests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"444-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2495014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2495014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本定性研究旨在提高对医疗从业者(HCPs)如何感知使用气管造口通气(TV)的ALS患者的生活质量的理解,以及这些观点在多大程度上为有关未来治疗和护理的讨论提供信息。方法:对24名具有支持渐冻症患者使用电视经验的专业多样化的HCPs进行在线半结构化访谈,并对数据进行专题分析。结果:与看电视有关的四个主要主题出现了:1)积极的好处;(二)风险与挑战;iii)影响HCP观点的因素;iv)关于HCP讨论的概念。医护人员承认,电视有可能延长寿命,但也担心会延长身体和认知功能的严重衰退。HCPs试图确定个人及其家庭的生活数量和质量之间的“临界点”,同时考虑到更高的护理负担的可能性。HCPs利用先前的经验来评估预期的生活质量,然而英国大多数HCPs对这一群体的电视经验有限。医护人员还利用以人为本的护理、病人自主和物有所值的原则来指导他们讨论电视的方法。结论:HCP对电视的积极结果的体验可以培养一种更积极主动的方式来发起关于其潜在用途的对话。分享最佳实践并改进对医护人员的指导,可能有助于早期和持续的未来护理规划,并使ALS患者能够做出知情且符合其最大利益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracheostomy ventilation in ALS: healthcare practitioner perspectives on quality of life and implications for decision-making.

Objectives: This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding of how healthcare practitioners (HCPs) perceive quality of life for people with ALS who use tracheostomy ventilation (TV) and the extent to which such views inform discussions regarding future treatment and care. Methods: A thematic analysis was applied to data derived from online semi-structured interviews with a professionally diverse group of 24 HCPs with experience of supporting people with ALS to use TV. Results: Four main themes relating to TV use emerged: i) Positive benefits; ii) Risks and challenges; iii) Factors influencing HCP perspectives; iv) Concepts informing HCP discussions. HCPs acknowledged that TV has the potential to extend life but were concerned with prolonging a serious decline in physical and cognitive functioning. HCPs tried to identify the 'tipping point' between quantity and quality of life for the individual and their family, taking into account the likelihood of a higher burden of care. HCPs drew on prior experience to assess anticipated quality of life, yet most HCPs in the UK have limited experience of TV for this group. HCPs also drew on principles of person-centered care, patient autonomy and value for money to guide their approach to discussing TV. Conclusions: HCP experience of positive outcomes of TV can foster a more proactive approach to initiating conversations about its potential use. Sharing best practice and improving guidance for HCPs may support early and on-going future care planning and enable people with ALS to make choices which are informed and in their best interests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信