Sachita Shrestha MPH, Marc Kowalkowski PhD, Sarah Birken PhD, Jessica Palakshappa MD, MS, Jessie King MD, PhD, Chadwick Miller MD, MS, Jason Pogue PhD, Stephanie Taylor MD, MS
{"title":"败血症研究方案诊断安全性和质量优化。","authors":"Sachita Shrestha MPH, Marc Kowalkowski PhD, Sarah Birken PhD, Jessica Palakshappa MD, MS, Jessie King MD, PhD, Chadwick Miller MD, MS, Jason Pogue PhD, Stephanie Taylor MD, MS","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sepsis ranks among the “Big Three\" conditions most prone to harmful diagnostic errors. Despite its high prevalence and severity, health systems lack effective and contextually tailored strategies to optimize diagnostic accuracy for sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study is to understand factors related to high sepsis diagnostic accuracy using principles and tools of safety and implementation science.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a multi-site study involving 20 hospitals across four states in the United States. The primary objectives are to (1) describe hospital-level variability and understand barriers and facilitators to sepsis diagnostic accuracy and (2) apply cross-case and coincidence analysis to determine minimally sufficient and necessary conditions for optimal sepsis diagnosis that minimizes under- and overtreatment. To identify barriers and facilitators of acute sepsis diagnosis, we will conduct electronic surveys and in-depth interviews with key informants from each hospital. We will use data from electronic health records (EHR) and data warehouses to operationalize sepsis diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We have enrolled 20 hospitals and begum data collection. The findings of this study will be used to develop a context-specific toolkit that guides the selection of feasible and important strategies to promote optimal sepsis diagnosis in diverse hospitals settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study uses tools and principles from safety and implementation science to generate first-of-its-kind evidence to improve diagnostic excellence in sepsis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 7","pages":"800-807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic safety and quality optimization in sepsis study protocol\",\"authors\":\"Sachita Shrestha MPH, Marc Kowalkowski PhD, Sarah Birken PhD, Jessica Palakshappa MD, MS, Jessie King MD, PhD, Chadwick Miller MD, MS, Jason Pogue PhD, Stephanie Taylor MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sepsis ranks among the “Big Three\\\" conditions most prone to harmful diagnostic errors. Despite its high prevalence and severity, health systems lack effective and contextually tailored strategies to optimize diagnostic accuracy for sepsis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this study is to understand factors related to high sepsis diagnostic accuracy using principles and tools of safety and implementation science.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a multi-site study involving 20 hospitals across four states in the United States. The primary objectives are to (1) describe hospital-level variability and understand barriers and facilitators to sepsis diagnostic accuracy and (2) apply cross-case and coincidence analysis to determine minimally sufficient and necessary conditions for optimal sepsis diagnosis that minimizes under- and overtreatment. To identify barriers and facilitators of acute sepsis diagnosis, we will conduct electronic surveys and in-depth interviews with key informants from each hospital. We will use data from electronic health records (EHR) and data warehouses to operationalize sepsis diagnostic accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We have enrolled 20 hospitals and begum data collection. The findings of this study will be used to develop a context-specific toolkit that guides the selection of feasible and important strategies to promote optimal sepsis diagnosis in diverse hospitals settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study uses tools and principles from safety and implementation science to generate first-of-its-kind evidence to improve diagnostic excellence in sepsis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"800-807\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.70052\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.70052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic safety and quality optimization in sepsis study protocol
Background
Sepsis ranks among the “Big Three" conditions most prone to harmful diagnostic errors. Despite its high prevalence and severity, health systems lack effective and contextually tailored strategies to optimize diagnostic accuracy for sepsis.
Objectives
The purpose of this study is to understand factors related to high sepsis diagnostic accuracy using principles and tools of safety and implementation science.
Methods
This is a multi-site study involving 20 hospitals across four states in the United States. The primary objectives are to (1) describe hospital-level variability and understand barriers and facilitators to sepsis diagnostic accuracy and (2) apply cross-case and coincidence analysis to determine minimally sufficient and necessary conditions for optimal sepsis diagnosis that minimizes under- and overtreatment. To identify barriers and facilitators of acute sepsis diagnosis, we will conduct electronic surveys and in-depth interviews with key informants from each hospital. We will use data from electronic health records (EHR) and data warehouses to operationalize sepsis diagnostic accuracy.
Results
We have enrolled 20 hospitals and begum data collection. The findings of this study will be used to develop a context-specific toolkit that guides the selection of feasible and important strategies to promote optimal sepsis diagnosis in diverse hospitals settings.
Conclusions
The study uses tools and principles from safety and implementation science to generate first-of-its-kind evidence to improve diagnostic excellence in sepsis.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.