父母关于死产的口头信息:VIPS研究(第一阶段)。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Azriel Gan Lin Lo, Lauren J Breen, Zoe Bradfield, Scott White, Sonya Criddle, Georgia Griffin, Bligh Berry, Jane Warland
{"title":"父母关于死产的口头信息:VIPS研究(第一阶段)。","authors":"Azriel Gan Lin Lo, Lauren J Breen, Zoe Bradfield, Scott White, Sonya Criddle, Georgia Griffin, Bligh Berry, Jane Warland","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many countries, a baby's cause of death (COD) following stillbirth is informed only by case notes and pathology investigations. However, parents' understanding of their baby's COD may inform or even change the COD diagnosis. We aimed to produce a standardised co-designed interview schedule to enable parents to contribute information to improve overall understanding of the causes of stillbirth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consensus for the interview schedule was sought via a two-round modified Delphi study. We recruited internationally for panel membership comprising bereaved parents, clinicians, and researchers. In Round 1, each panellist provided up to five questions to ask bereaved parents. After collation into categories, Round 2 asked panellists to rate the importance of each question category on a four-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panellists (n = 126 Round 1, n = 75 Round 2) were mainly bereaved parents. In Round 1, 553 potential interview questions were generated. These were grouped into categories which were pregnancy experience, antenatal care, fetal wellbeing, maternal wellbeing, days Prior to stillbirth and perceived COD. These proposed questions and question categories were then put to panel members in Round 2. All categories achieved consensus for inclusion in the final interview schedule with positive consensus percentage scores ranging from 83% to 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Panel membership comprising mainly bereaved parents provided a clear mandate for questions parents want to be asked. The interview schedule will soon be trialled with recently bereaved parents at a tertiary-referral maternity health service. Findings from the study will inform future research on how to include parents' voices in COD determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verbal Information From Parents About Stillbirth: The VIPS Study (Phase One).\",\"authors\":\"Azriel Gan Lin Lo, Lauren J Breen, Zoe Bradfield, Scott White, Sonya Criddle, Georgia Griffin, Bligh Berry, Jane Warland\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In many countries, a baby's cause of death (COD) following stillbirth is informed only by case notes and pathology investigations. However, parents' understanding of their baby's COD may inform or even change the COD diagnosis. We aimed to produce a standardised co-designed interview schedule to enable parents to contribute information to improve overall understanding of the causes of stillbirth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consensus for the interview schedule was sought via a two-round modified Delphi study. We recruited internationally for panel membership comprising bereaved parents, clinicians, and researchers. In Round 1, each panellist provided up to five questions to ask bereaved parents. After collation into categories, Round 2 asked panellists to rate the importance of each question category on a four-point scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panellists (n = 126 Round 1, n = 75 Round 2) were mainly bereaved parents. In Round 1, 553 potential interview questions were generated. These were grouped into categories which were pregnancy experience, antenatal care, fetal wellbeing, maternal wellbeing, days Prior to stillbirth and perceived COD. These proposed questions and question categories were then put to panel members in Round 2. All categories achieved consensus for inclusion in the final interview schedule with positive consensus percentage scores ranging from 83% to 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Panel membership comprising mainly bereaved parents provided a clear mandate for questions parents want to be asked. The interview schedule will soon be trialled with recently bereaved parents at a tertiary-referral maternity health service. Findings from the study will inform future research on how to include parents' voices in COD determination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在许多国家,死产后婴儿的死因(COD)只能通过病例记录和病理调查来确定。然而,父母对婴儿COD的了解可能会影响甚至改变COD的诊断。我们的目标是制定一个标准化的共同设计的访谈时间表,使父母能够提供信息,以提高对死产原因的全面了解。材料和方法:通过两轮改进的德尔菲研究寻求访谈时间表的共识。我们在国际上招募了包括丧亲父母、临床医生和研究人员在内的小组成员。在第一轮中,每个小组成员向失去亲人的父母提出最多5个问题。在分类后,第二轮要求小组成员以4分制对每个问题类别的重要性进行评分。结果:小组成员(n = 126第1轮,n = 75第2轮)主要是丧亲父母。在第15轮中,产生了553个潜在的面试问题。这些数据被分为怀孕经历、产前护理、胎儿健康、产妇健康、死产前天数和感知到的COD。这些提出的问题和问题类别随后被提交给第二轮的小组成员。所有类别都达成了共识,包括在最终的面试时间表中,正面共识百分比得分从83%到98%不等。结论:小组成员主要由丧亲父母组成,对父母想要问的问题提供了明确的授权。面谈时间表将很快在一家三级转诊的产妇保健服务机构试用。这项研究的结果将为未来如何将父母的声音纳入COD测定的研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verbal Information From Parents About Stillbirth: The VIPS Study (Phase One).

Background: In many countries, a baby's cause of death (COD) following stillbirth is informed only by case notes and pathology investigations. However, parents' understanding of their baby's COD may inform or even change the COD diagnosis. We aimed to produce a standardised co-designed interview schedule to enable parents to contribute information to improve overall understanding of the causes of stillbirth.

Materials and methods: Consensus for the interview schedule was sought via a two-round modified Delphi study. We recruited internationally for panel membership comprising bereaved parents, clinicians, and researchers. In Round 1, each panellist provided up to five questions to ask bereaved parents. After collation into categories, Round 2 asked panellists to rate the importance of each question category on a four-point scale.

Results: Panellists (n = 126 Round 1, n = 75 Round 2) were mainly bereaved parents. In Round 1, 553 potential interview questions were generated. These were grouped into categories which were pregnancy experience, antenatal care, fetal wellbeing, maternal wellbeing, days Prior to stillbirth and perceived COD. These proposed questions and question categories were then put to panel members in Round 2. All categories achieved consensus for inclusion in the final interview schedule with positive consensus percentage scores ranging from 83% to 98%.

Conclusions: Panel membership comprising mainly bereaved parents provided a clear mandate for questions parents want to be asked. The interview schedule will soon be trialled with recently bereaved parents at a tertiary-referral maternity health service. Findings from the study will inform future research on how to include parents' voices in COD determination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信