无心电图导联冠状动脉ct血管造影;可行性研究。

Brian Thomsen, Ali Nabipoor, Sanaz Asadian, Ingrid Reiser, Juan Cotella, Darin Okerlund, Melissa Challman, Luis Landeras, Hamid Chalian
{"title":"无心电图导联冠状动脉ct血管造影;可行性研究。","authors":"Brian Thomsen, Ali Nabipoor, Sanaz Asadian, Ingrid Reiser, Juan Cotella, Darin Okerlund, Melissa Challman, Luis Landeras, Hamid Chalian","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern CT scanners with wide coverage and high temporal resolution have enabled robust coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with automated phase selection and motion correction algorithms, even at high heart rates and arrhythmia. We hypothesized that these advanced technologies may make it feasible to perform a CCTA without triggering from a patient's ECG signal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three subjects undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled. ECG-less CCTA data was acquired for approximately the whole cardiac cycle using a wide-coverage scanner with fast gantry rotation (Revolution Apex, GE HealthCare). Images were generated using seven sub-ranges of the acquired data and evaluated for motion artifact using a 6-point Likert scale by three experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 62.0 ± 12.0 years; 51.2 % were male. The mean heart rate (HR) was 65.3 ± 9.0 beats per minute (bpm). Overall image quality (IQ) was higher with motion correction vs standard reconstruction (4.6 ± 0.66 vs 4.0 ± 0.95, p < 0.01). At HR ≤ 60 bpm, 61-70 bpm, ≥ 71 bpm, IQ scores were 4.9 ± 0.31, 4.5 ± 0.66, 4.4 ± 0.78, respectively. IQ from sub-ranges was similar to the reference of the study, reconstructed images from full-phase data, except in the cases where 1/4 of the scanned data was considered in HR ≤ 60 bpm and ≥ 71 bpm (4.3 ± 0.83, 4.6 ± 0.67 and 4.1 ± 0.96 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA without ECG leads on an advanced CT scanner is feasible. This approach could improve patient comfort, workflow efficiency, and access to CCTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary computed tomography angiography without ECG leads; A feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Thomsen, Ali Nabipoor, Sanaz Asadian, Ingrid Reiser, Juan Cotella, Darin Okerlund, Melissa Challman, Luis Landeras, Hamid Chalian\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.04.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern CT scanners with wide coverage and high temporal resolution have enabled robust coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with automated phase selection and motion correction algorithms, even at high heart rates and arrhythmia. We hypothesized that these advanced technologies may make it feasible to perform a CCTA without triggering from a patient's ECG signal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three subjects undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled. ECG-less CCTA data was acquired for approximately the whole cardiac cycle using a wide-coverage scanner with fast gantry rotation (Revolution Apex, GE HealthCare). Images were generated using seven sub-ranges of the acquired data and evaluated for motion artifact using a 6-point Likert scale by three experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 62.0 ± 12.0 years; 51.2 % were male. The mean heart rate (HR) was 65.3 ± 9.0 beats per minute (bpm). Overall image quality (IQ) was higher with motion correction vs standard reconstruction (4.6 ± 0.66 vs 4.0 ± 0.95, p < 0.01). At HR ≤ 60 bpm, 61-70 bpm, ≥ 71 bpm, IQ scores were 4.9 ± 0.31, 4.5 ± 0.66, 4.4 ± 0.78, respectively. IQ from sub-ranges was similar to the reference of the study, reconstructed images from full-phase data, except in the cases where 1/4 of the scanned data was considered in HR ≤ 60 bpm and ≥ 71 bpm (4.3 ± 0.83, 4.6 ± 0.67 and 4.1 ± 0.96 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CCTA without ECG leads on an advanced CT scanner is feasible. This approach could improve patient comfort, workflow efficiency, and access to CCTA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.04.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.04.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现代CT扫描仪具有广泛的覆盖范围和高时间分辨率,即使在高心率和心律失常时,也能通过自动相位选择和运动校正算法实现强大的冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)。我们假设这些先进的技术可能使CCTA在不触发患者ECG信号的情况下成为可能。方法:前瞻性纳入43名接受临床指示CCTA的受试者。使用快速龙门旋转的宽覆盖扫描仪(Revolution Apex, GE HealthCare)获得大约整个心脏周期的无心电图CCTA数据。使用采集数据的七个子范围生成图像,并由三位专家使用6点李克特量表评估运动伪影。结果:研究人群的平均年龄为62.0±12.0岁;51.2%为男性。平均心率(HR)为65.3±9.0次/分钟(bpm)。运动校正与标准重建相比,整体图像质量(IQ)更高(4.6±0.66 vs 4.0±0.95,p < 0.01)。心率≤60bpm、61 ~ 70bpm、≥71 bpm时,智商得分分别为4.9±0.31、4.5±0.66、4.4±0.78。除了1/4的扫描数据在HR≤60 bpm和≥71 bpm时被考虑(分别为4.3±0.83、4.6±0.67和4.1±0.96)外,子范围的IQ与本研究参考全相数据重建图像相似。结论:在先进的CT扫描仪上无导联CCTA是可行的。这种方法可以提高患者的舒适度、工作流程效率和CCTA的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coronary computed tomography angiography without ECG leads; A feasibility study.

Background: Modern CT scanners with wide coverage and high temporal resolution have enabled robust coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with automated phase selection and motion correction algorithms, even at high heart rates and arrhythmia. We hypothesized that these advanced technologies may make it feasible to perform a CCTA without triggering from a patient's ECG signal.

Methods: Forty-three subjects undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled. ECG-less CCTA data was acquired for approximately the whole cardiac cycle using a wide-coverage scanner with fast gantry rotation (Revolution Apex, GE HealthCare). Images were generated using seven sub-ranges of the acquired data and evaluated for motion artifact using a 6-point Likert scale by three experts.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 62.0 ± 12.0 years; 51.2 % were male. The mean heart rate (HR) was 65.3 ± 9.0 beats per minute (bpm). Overall image quality (IQ) was higher with motion correction vs standard reconstruction (4.6 ± 0.66 vs 4.0 ± 0.95, p < 0.01). At HR ≤ 60 bpm, 61-70 bpm, ≥ 71 bpm, IQ scores were 4.9 ± 0.31, 4.5 ± 0.66, 4.4 ± 0.78, respectively. IQ from sub-ranges was similar to the reference of the study, reconstructed images from full-phase data, except in the cases where 1/4 of the scanned data was considered in HR ≤ 60 bpm and ≥ 71 bpm (4.3 ± 0.83, 4.6 ± 0.67 and 4.1 ± 0.96 respectively).

Conclusion: CCTA without ECG leads on an advanced CT scanner is feasible. This approach could improve patient comfort, workflow efficiency, and access to CCTA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信