Gerald B Moody, Sachin Shah, Ali Hasan, A Paige Davis Volk
{"title":"基于体重的高流量鼻插管流量限制对毛细支气管炎重症监护病房使用率的影响。","authors":"Gerald B Moody, Sachin Shah, Ali Hasan, A Paige Davis Volk","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common respiratory support device utilized in the management of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Early adoption in many pediatric wards was developed using age-based flow limits. However, age-based limits do not align with current evidence and potentially contribute to ICU admissions. To align with current evidence and improve ICU bed allocation, we implemented weight-based flow limits within our wards. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on ICU utilization. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study was conducted at Children's Medical Center in Plano, Texas, a free-standing, community-based hospital affiliated with an academic quaternary center. Subjects were patients < 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis and supported via HFNC in the 12 months before and after implementation of weight-based flow limits. Primary outcomes were ED disposition and ICU transfer rates. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of adverse respiratory events and stay. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,207 subjects met inclusion criteria; 558 pre- and 649 post-implementation. There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or gender. Compared with the pre-implementation group, we observed an 8.6% absolute decrease in ICU admissions [92 (16.5%) vs 51 (7.9%)<i>, P</i> < .001], a 3% absolute decrease in ward to ICU transfers [28 (6%) vs 19 (3%)<i>, P</i> = .034], and no difference in escalation of respiratory support [6 (1.1%) vs 4 (0.6%)<i>, P</i> = .38] or escalation within one hour of transfer [0 (0%) vs 2 (50%)<i>, P</i> > .99]. Overall median stay decreased by 15.9 h in the post-implementation group, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2)<i>, P</i> < .001]. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that for hospital systems utilizing similar age-based HFNC flow limits, transitioning to weight-based flows, with safeguards in place, may improve ICU bed utilization while maintaining comparable patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1240-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Weight-Based High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Limits on Intensive Care Unit Utilization in Bronchiolitis.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald B Moody, Sachin Shah, Ali Hasan, A Paige Davis Volk\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.12525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common respiratory support device utilized in the management of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Early adoption in many pediatric wards was developed using age-based flow limits. However, age-based limits do not align with current evidence and potentially contribute to ICU admissions. To align with current evidence and improve ICU bed allocation, we implemented weight-based flow limits within our wards. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on ICU utilization. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study was conducted at Children's Medical Center in Plano, Texas, a free-standing, community-based hospital affiliated with an academic quaternary center. Subjects were patients < 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis and supported via HFNC in the 12 months before and after implementation of weight-based flow limits. Primary outcomes were ED disposition and ICU transfer rates. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of adverse respiratory events and stay. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,207 subjects met inclusion criteria; 558 pre- and 649 post-implementation. There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or gender. Compared with the pre-implementation group, we observed an 8.6% absolute decrease in ICU admissions [92 (16.5%) vs 51 (7.9%)<i>, P</i> < .001], a 3% absolute decrease in ward to ICU transfers [28 (6%) vs 19 (3%)<i>, P</i> = .034], and no difference in escalation of respiratory support [6 (1.1%) vs 4 (0.6%)<i>, P</i> = .38] or escalation within one hour of transfer [0 (0%) vs 2 (50%)<i>, P</i> > .99]. Overall median stay decreased by 15.9 h in the post-implementation group, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2)<i>, P</i> < .001]. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that for hospital systems utilizing similar age-based HFNC flow limits, transitioning to weight-based flows, with safeguards in place, may improve ICU bed utilization while maintaining comparable patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1240-1247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Weight-Based High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Limits on Intensive Care Unit Utilization in Bronchiolitis.
Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common respiratory support device utilized in the management of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Early adoption in many pediatric wards was developed using age-based flow limits. However, age-based limits do not align with current evidence and potentially contribute to ICU admissions. To align with current evidence and improve ICU bed allocation, we implemented weight-based flow limits within our wards. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on ICU utilization. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Children's Medical Center in Plano, Texas, a free-standing, community-based hospital affiliated with an academic quaternary center. Subjects were patients < 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis and supported via HFNC in the 12 months before and after implementation of weight-based flow limits. Primary outcomes were ED disposition and ICU transfer rates. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of adverse respiratory events and stay. Results: A total of 1,207 subjects met inclusion criteria; 558 pre- and 649 post-implementation. There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or gender. Compared with the pre-implementation group, we observed an 8.6% absolute decrease in ICU admissions [92 (16.5%) vs 51 (7.9%), P < .001], a 3% absolute decrease in ward to ICU transfers [28 (6%) vs 19 (3%), P = .034], and no difference in escalation of respiratory support [6 (1.1%) vs 4 (0.6%), P = .38] or escalation within one hour of transfer [0 (0%) vs 2 (50%), P > .99]. Overall median stay decreased by 15.9 h in the post-implementation group, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2), P < .001]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that for hospital systems utilizing similar age-based HFNC flow limits, transitioning to weight-based flows, with safeguards in place, may improve ICU bed utilization while maintaining comparable patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.