选择性腹部大手术后重症监护病房入住计划:siaartii - sic - aniartii的良好临床实践文件。

Bruna Lavezzo, Giandomenico Biancofiore, Ersilia Luca, Roberto Balagna, Elena Bignami, Ugo Boggi, Rita Cataldo, Giuseppe Chiaramonte, Andrea Cortegiani, Umberto Fiandra, Roberta Mariani, Matteo Manici, Alessia Mattei, Liliana Sollazzi, Luigi Tritapepe, Martina Tosi, Stefano Turi, Mauro Zago, Paola Aceto
{"title":"选择性腹部大手术后重症监护病房入住计划:siaartii - sic - aniartii的良好临床实践文件。","authors":"Bruna Lavezzo, Giandomenico Biancofiore, Ersilia Luca, Roberto Balagna, Elena Bignami, Ugo Boggi, Rita Cataldo, Giuseppe Chiaramonte, Andrea Cortegiani, Umberto Fiandra, Roberta Mariani, Matteo Manici, Alessia Mattei, Liliana Sollazzi, Luigi Tritapepe, Martina Tosi, Stefano Turi, Mauro Zago, Paola Aceto","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00239-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative complications (PCs) are a major cause of mortality following elective major abdominal surgery (EMAS). The increasing complexity of abdominal procedures, particularly in oncology, may significantly affect patient outcomes. However, this has also introduced a higher variability in postoperative management, and the use of tailored approaches to address critical issues such as hemodynamic stabilization, infection management, and respiratory failure. While elective admission to intensive care units (ICU) is a standard practice to manage high-risk surgical patients, ICU resource allocation is often influenced by local practices and bed availability.This document presents a framework for preoperative ICU admission planning after EMAS. It focuses on the identification of patient and surgical risk factors-using established scoring systems-and provides statements to determine ICU admission. The aim is to optimize resource allocation, reduce PCs, and prevent unplanned ICU admissions. This good clinical practice statement was developed through a multidisciplinary panel formed by selected members coming from SIAARTI (Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care), SIC (Italian Society of Surgery) and ANIARTI (National Association of Critical Area Nurses).The designed scientific board developed, through a systematic literature review and a consensus methodology, a roadmap for defining the priorities of perioperative care based on the complexity of the patient and the surgical procedure. Eventually, the panel worked out statements about six voted queries that could have supported the preoperative indication to postoperative ICU admission.Evaluation of patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical factors are all essential to plan ICU admission for immediate postoperative patient care after EMAS.The presence and severity of comorbidities, assessed through various severity scores, play a crucial role in predicting PCs and guiding ICU admission decisions. Tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Rockwood Frailty Index, along with surgical risk scores and intraoperative events, help define the need for intensive care. Preoperative frailty assessment-achieved using the Clinical Frailty Scale-is essential to anticipate postoperative care needs. Finally, during the postoperative phase, continuous monitoring and reassessment in the post-anesthesia care unit are key to determine whether ICU admission is required. Establishing high-dependency units and tailored care pathways based on individual patient needs and available resources will enhance patient outcomes and optimize postoperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning intensive care unit admission after elective major abdominal surgery: good clinical practice document by SIAARTI-SIC-ANIARTI.\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Lavezzo, Giandomenico Biancofiore, Ersilia Luca, Roberto Balagna, Elena Bignami, Ugo Boggi, Rita Cataldo, Giuseppe Chiaramonte, Andrea Cortegiani, Umberto Fiandra, Roberta Mariani, Matteo Manici, Alessia Mattei, Liliana Sollazzi, Luigi Tritapepe, Martina Tosi, Stefano Turi, Mauro Zago, Paola Aceto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44158-025-00239-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postoperative complications (PCs) are a major cause of mortality following elective major abdominal surgery (EMAS). The increasing complexity of abdominal procedures, particularly in oncology, may significantly affect patient outcomes. However, this has also introduced a higher variability in postoperative management, and the use of tailored approaches to address critical issues such as hemodynamic stabilization, infection management, and respiratory failure. While elective admission to intensive care units (ICU) is a standard practice to manage high-risk surgical patients, ICU resource allocation is often influenced by local practices and bed availability.This document presents a framework for preoperative ICU admission planning after EMAS. It focuses on the identification of patient and surgical risk factors-using established scoring systems-and provides statements to determine ICU admission. The aim is to optimize resource allocation, reduce PCs, and prevent unplanned ICU admissions. This good clinical practice statement was developed through a multidisciplinary panel formed by selected members coming from SIAARTI (Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care), SIC (Italian Society of Surgery) and ANIARTI (National Association of Critical Area Nurses).The designed scientific board developed, through a systematic literature review and a consensus methodology, a roadmap for defining the priorities of perioperative care based on the complexity of the patient and the surgical procedure. Eventually, the panel worked out statements about six voted queries that could have supported the preoperative indication to postoperative ICU admission.Evaluation of patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical factors are all essential to plan ICU admission for immediate postoperative patient care after EMAS.The presence and severity of comorbidities, assessed through various severity scores, play a crucial role in predicting PCs and guiding ICU admission decisions. Tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Rockwood Frailty Index, along with surgical risk scores and intraoperative events, help define the need for intensive care. Preoperative frailty assessment-achieved using the Clinical Frailty Scale-is essential to anticipate postoperative care needs. Finally, during the postoperative phase, continuous monitoring and reassessment in the post-anesthesia care unit are key to determine whether ICU admission is required. Establishing high-dependency units and tailored care pathways based on individual patient needs and available resources will enhance patient outcomes and optimize postoperative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00239-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00239-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后并发症(PCs)是择期腹部大手术(EMAS)后死亡的主要原因。腹部手术日益复杂,尤其是肿瘤手术,可能会显著影响患者的预后。然而,这也引入了术后管理的更高可变性,并使用量身定制的方法来解决血流动力学稳定、感染管理和呼吸衰竭等关键问题。虽然选择性入住重症监护病房(ICU)是管理高危外科患者的标准做法,但ICU资源分配往往受到当地实践和床位可用性的影响。本文提出了EMAS后术前ICU住院计划的框架。它侧重于识别患者和手术风险因素-使用已建立的评分系统-并提供决定ICU住院的声明。目的是优化资源分配,减少pc,防止计划外ICU入院。这一良好的临床实践声明是由来自SIAARTI(意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护学会)、SIC(意大利外科学会)和ANIARTI(全国危重区护士协会)的成员组成的多学科小组制定的。设计的科学委员会通过系统的文献回顾和共识方法,制定了一个路线图,根据患者和外科手术的复杂性来确定围手术期护理的优先事项。最终,专家组制定了关于六个投票查询的声明,这些查询可以支持术前适应证到术后ICU住院。评估患者的特征、合并症和手术因素对于EMAS术后患者立即护理的ICU住院计划都是必不可少的。通过各种严重程度评分评估合并症的存在和严重程度,在预测pc和指导ICU住院决策中起着至关重要的作用。诸如美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况、Charlson合并症指数和Rockwood虚弱指数等工具,以及手术风险评分和术中事件,有助于确定是否需要重症监护。术前虚弱评估(使用临床虚弱量表)对于预测术后护理需求至关重要。最后,在术后阶段,麻醉后护理单元的持续监测和重新评估是决定是否需要进入ICU的关键。根据患者个体需求和现有资源建立高依赖性病房和量身定制的护理路径将提高患者的治疗效果并优化术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planning intensive care unit admission after elective major abdominal surgery: good clinical practice document by SIAARTI-SIC-ANIARTI.

Postoperative complications (PCs) are a major cause of mortality following elective major abdominal surgery (EMAS). The increasing complexity of abdominal procedures, particularly in oncology, may significantly affect patient outcomes. However, this has also introduced a higher variability in postoperative management, and the use of tailored approaches to address critical issues such as hemodynamic stabilization, infection management, and respiratory failure. While elective admission to intensive care units (ICU) is a standard practice to manage high-risk surgical patients, ICU resource allocation is often influenced by local practices and bed availability.This document presents a framework for preoperative ICU admission planning after EMAS. It focuses on the identification of patient and surgical risk factors-using established scoring systems-and provides statements to determine ICU admission. The aim is to optimize resource allocation, reduce PCs, and prevent unplanned ICU admissions. This good clinical practice statement was developed through a multidisciplinary panel formed by selected members coming from SIAARTI (Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care), SIC (Italian Society of Surgery) and ANIARTI (National Association of Critical Area Nurses).The designed scientific board developed, through a systematic literature review and a consensus methodology, a roadmap for defining the priorities of perioperative care based on the complexity of the patient and the surgical procedure. Eventually, the panel worked out statements about six voted queries that could have supported the preoperative indication to postoperative ICU admission.Evaluation of patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical factors are all essential to plan ICU admission for immediate postoperative patient care after EMAS.The presence and severity of comorbidities, assessed through various severity scores, play a crucial role in predicting PCs and guiding ICU admission decisions. Tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Rockwood Frailty Index, along with surgical risk scores and intraoperative events, help define the need for intensive care. Preoperative frailty assessment-achieved using the Clinical Frailty Scale-is essential to anticipate postoperative care needs. Finally, during the postoperative phase, continuous monitoring and reassessment in the post-anesthesia care unit are key to determine whether ICU admission is required. Establishing high-dependency units and tailored care pathways based on individual patient needs and available resources will enhance patient outcomes and optimize postoperative care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信