作为多中心肾剂量测定基础的177lu - spect图像定量验证方案。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Lovisa Jessen, Selma Curkic Kapidzic, Johan Gustafsson, Erik Larsson, Michael Ljungberg, Mattias Sandström, Johanna Dalmo, Linn Hagmarker, Cecilia Hindorf, Jan Taprogge, Jonathan Gear, Glenn Flux, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner
{"title":"作为多中心肾剂量测定基础的177lu - spect图像定量验证方案。","authors":"Lovisa Jessen, Selma Curkic Kapidzic, Johan Gustafsson, Erik Larsson, Michael Ljungberg, Mattias Sandström, Johanna Dalmo, Linn Hagmarker, Cecilia Hindorf, Jan Taprogge, Jonathan Gear, Glenn Flux, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/add708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Multicentre studies in molecular radiotherapy face challenges in ensuring the comparability of dosimetry results. The aim of this study was to develop a validation protocol to achieve equivalent<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT quantification across centres, consisting of a test exercise in combination with an action level.<i>Approach</i>.<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT/CT imaging of 3D-printed kidney phantoms with non-uniform activity distributions was conducted at five hospitals in Sweden and the UK. In total, 12 quantification systems (QSs) were included, where a QS was defined as the combination of a given camera system, reconstruction method and image-analysis method. The accuracy of image-based estimates of the activity concentration was investigated for three approaches to multicentre dosimetry: one site-specific, and two variants of centralised approaches. For the site-specific approach, the reference value was blinded to the evaluating operators. Prior to the evaluation, the participants agreed on an action level, specified as an obtained deviation larger than ±10% from the reference value. Sites responsible for a QS that yielded larger deviations, and therefore did not comply, were required to present an action plan, i.e., a plan for further method optimisation.<i>Main results</i>. For the site-specific approach, deviations larger than 10% were obtained for six out of 12 QS (range -11% to +27%). Action plans were presented for these QS and was implemented by one site (two QS). For the two variants of centralised approaches, where nine QS were included in total, deviations of within 10% were obtained for nine and seven QS, respectively.<i>Significance</i>. A quantification test combined with an action level can serve as an initial validation to enable further development and to achieve equivalent<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT quantification across sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validation protocol for<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT image quantification as a basis for multi-centre kidney dosimetry.\",\"authors\":\"Lovisa Jessen, Selma Curkic Kapidzic, Johan Gustafsson, Erik Larsson, Michael Ljungberg, Mattias Sandström, Johanna Dalmo, Linn Hagmarker, Cecilia Hindorf, Jan Taprogge, Jonathan Gear, Glenn Flux, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/add708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Multicentre studies in molecular radiotherapy face challenges in ensuring the comparability of dosimetry results. The aim of this study was to develop a validation protocol to achieve equivalent<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT quantification across centres, consisting of a test exercise in combination with an action level.<i>Approach</i>.<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT/CT imaging of 3D-printed kidney phantoms with non-uniform activity distributions was conducted at five hospitals in Sweden and the UK. In total, 12 quantification systems (QSs) were included, where a QS was defined as the combination of a given camera system, reconstruction method and image-analysis method. The accuracy of image-based estimates of the activity concentration was investigated for three approaches to multicentre dosimetry: one site-specific, and two variants of centralised approaches. For the site-specific approach, the reference value was blinded to the evaluating operators. Prior to the evaluation, the participants agreed on an action level, specified as an obtained deviation larger than ±10% from the reference value. Sites responsible for a QS that yielded larger deviations, and therefore did not comply, were required to present an action plan, i.e., a plan for further method optimisation.<i>Main results</i>. For the site-specific approach, deviations larger than 10% were obtained for six out of 12 QS (range -11% to +27%). Action plans were presented for these QS and was implemented by one site (two QS). For the two variants of centralised approaches, where nine QS were included in total, deviations of within 10% were obtained for nine and seven QS, respectively.<i>Significance</i>. A quantification test combined with an action level can serve as an initial validation to enable further development and to achieve equivalent<sup>177</sup>Lu-SPECT quantification across sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/add708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多中心分子放疗研究在保证剂量测定结果的可比性方面面临挑战。本研究的目的是开发一种验证方案,以实现跨中心等效的177Lu-SPECT量化,包括结合动作水平的测试练习。方法:在瑞典和英国的五家医院进行了具有不均匀活性分布的3d打印肾脏幻影的177Lu-SPECT/CT成像。总共包括12个量化系统(QS),其中QS定义为给定的摄像系统、重建方法和图像分析方法的组合。研究了三种多中心剂量学方法的基于图像的活性浓度估计的准确性:一种是特定地点的方法,以及两种集中方法的变体。对于特定地点的方法,参考值对评估操作者是不透明的。在评估之前,参与者同意一个行动水平,指定为与参考值的偏差大于±10%。对产生较大偏差的QS负责的站点,因此不遵守,被要求提出行动计划,即进一步方法优化的计划。主要结果:对于特定地点的方法,12个QS中有6个偏差大于10%(范围为- 11%至+ 27%)。针对这些QS提出了行动计划,并由一个站点(两个QS)实施。对于集中方法的两种变体,其中总共包括9个QS,分别获得了9个和7个QS在10%以内的偏差。 ;意义:与作用水平相结合的定量测试可以作为初始验证,以促进进一步的开发,并实现跨位点的等效的177lu - spect定量。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A validation protocol for177Lu-SPECT image quantification as a basis for multi-centre kidney dosimetry.

Objective. Multicentre studies in molecular radiotherapy face challenges in ensuring the comparability of dosimetry results. The aim of this study was to develop a validation protocol to achieve equivalent177Lu-SPECT quantification across centres, consisting of a test exercise in combination with an action level.Approach.177Lu-SPECT/CT imaging of 3D-printed kidney phantoms with non-uniform activity distributions was conducted at five hospitals in Sweden and the UK. In total, 12 quantification systems (QSs) were included, where a QS was defined as the combination of a given camera system, reconstruction method and image-analysis method. The accuracy of image-based estimates of the activity concentration was investigated for three approaches to multicentre dosimetry: one site-specific, and two variants of centralised approaches. For the site-specific approach, the reference value was blinded to the evaluating operators. Prior to the evaluation, the participants agreed on an action level, specified as an obtained deviation larger than ±10% from the reference value. Sites responsible for a QS that yielded larger deviations, and therefore did not comply, were required to present an action plan, i.e., a plan for further method optimisation.Main results. For the site-specific approach, deviations larger than 10% were obtained for six out of 12 QS (range -11% to +27%). Action plans were presented for these QS and was implemented by one site (two QS). For the two variants of centralised approaches, where nine QS were included in total, deviations of within 10% were obtained for nine and seven QS, respectively.Significance. A quantification test combined with an action level can serve as an initial validation to enable further development and to achieve equivalent177Lu-SPECT quantification across sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信