在联邦合格医疗中心服务的黑人/非裔美国患者中,粪便DNA结直肠癌筛查的可接受性

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Evan Keiser, A Michelle Corbett, Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, Allison Antoine, Carrie Stehman, Isabella Dorn, David Goines, Noelle K LoConte
{"title":"在联邦合格医疗中心服务的黑人/非裔美国患者中,粪便DNA结直肠癌筛查的可接受性","authors":"Evan Keiser, A Michelle Corbett, Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, Allison Antoine, Carrie Stehman, Isabella Dorn, David Goines, Noelle K LoConte","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an increased burden among Black/African-American populations. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, home-based CRC screening options are being used more frequently. We conducted focus groups to understand the acceptability of stool-based DNA testing for CRC screening in this population. Ten focus groups about the acceptability of various CRC screening modalities were held with Black/African-American participants at two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Participants were separated into focus groups based on age and gender. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo. Across the groups, there were a total of 79 participants, of which 40.5% were aged 40-50 years (\"younger participants\"), 59.5% aged > 50 years (\"older participants\"), 53.2% male, and 46.8% female. Overall, knowledge was low regarding perceived risk of CRC. There was limited awareness of CRC screening options among younger patients and widespread lack of knowledge about stool-based DNA testing. Most respondents preferred colonoscopy as their first-choice screening test but were open to other screening tests. Stool-based DNA tests were more preferred among younger participants but was felt to be acceptable across all groups. Given the low awareness/knowledge of screening modalities identified in our study, educational interventions and shared decision making by primary care providers are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Evan Keiser, A Michelle Corbett, Onyema Chido-Amajuoyi, Allison Antoine, Carrie Stehman, Isabella Dorn, David Goines, Noelle K LoConte\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an increased burden among Black/African-American populations. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, home-based CRC screening options are being used more frequently. We conducted focus groups to understand the acceptability of stool-based DNA testing for CRC screening in this population. Ten focus groups about the acceptability of various CRC screening modalities were held with Black/African-American participants at two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Participants were separated into focus groups based on age and gender. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo. Across the groups, there were a total of 79 participants, of which 40.5% were aged 40-50 years (\\\"younger participants\\\"), 59.5% aged > 50 years (\\\"older participants\\\"), 53.2% male, and 46.8% female. Overall, knowledge was low regarding perceived risk of CRC. There was limited awareness of CRC screening options among younger patients and widespread lack of knowledge about stool-based DNA testing. Most respondents preferred colonoscopy as their first-choice screening test but were open to other screening tests. Stool-based DNA tests were more preferred among younger participants but was felt to be acceptable across all groups. Given the low awareness/knowledge of screening modalities identified in our study, educational interventions and shared decision making by primary care providers are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02631-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)在黑人/非裔美国人中负担增加。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,以家庭为基础的结直肠癌筛查方案的使用越来越频繁。我们进行了焦点小组,以了解基于粪便的DNA检测在该人群中用于结直肠癌筛查的可接受性。在威斯康辛州密尔沃基的两家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs),以黑人/非裔美国人为参与者,就各种结直肠癌筛查方式的可接受性举行了10个焦点小组。参与者根据年龄和性别被分成焦点小组。使用NVivo进行专题分析。在所有组中,共有79名参与者,其中40.5%年龄在40-50岁之间(“年轻参与者”),59.5%年龄在40-50岁之间(“老年参与者”),53.2%为男性,46.8%为女性。总体而言,人们对结直肠癌风险的认知程度较低。年轻患者对CRC筛查选择的认识有限,普遍缺乏基于粪便的DNA检测的知识。大多数受访者首选结肠镜检查作为他们的首选筛查检查,但对其他筛查检查持开放态度。基于粪便的DNA测试在年轻参与者中更受欢迎,但在所有群体中都被认为是可以接受的。鉴于在我们的研究中发现的筛查方式的低意识/知识,教育干预和初级保健提供者共同决策是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of Stool-Based DNA Colorectal Cancer Screening among Black/African-American Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has an increased burden among Black/African-American populations. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, home-based CRC screening options are being used more frequently. We conducted focus groups to understand the acceptability of stool-based DNA testing for CRC screening in this population. Ten focus groups about the acceptability of various CRC screening modalities were held with Black/African-American participants at two federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Participants were separated into focus groups based on age and gender. Thematic analysis was carried out using NVivo. Across the groups, there were a total of 79 participants, of which 40.5% were aged 40-50 years ("younger participants"), 59.5% aged > 50 years ("older participants"), 53.2% male, and 46.8% female. Overall, knowledge was low regarding perceived risk of CRC. There was limited awareness of CRC screening options among younger patients and widespread lack of knowledge about stool-based DNA testing. Most respondents preferred colonoscopy as their first-choice screening test but were open to other screening tests. Stool-based DNA tests were more preferred among younger participants but was felt to be acceptable across all groups. Given the low awareness/knowledge of screening modalities identified in our study, educational interventions and shared decision making by primary care providers are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信