埃塞俄比亚东北部肌肉骨骼损伤患者传统植骨服务的利用及其相关因素

IF 1.9 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1484403
Mengesha Alemu Seid, Betelhem Walelgn, Ashenafi Kibret Sendekie, Getachew Tesfaw Walle, Melkamu Adamu Geremew, Mikiyas Haylu Sahlu, Simachew Asress Mekonen, Biruk Beletew Abate
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚东北部肌肉骨骼损伤患者传统植骨服务的利用及其相关因素","authors":"Mengesha Alemu Seid, Betelhem Walelgn, Ashenafi Kibret Sendekie, Getachew Tesfaw Walle, Melkamu Adamu Geremew, Mikiyas Haylu Sahlu, Simachew Asress Mekonen, Biruk Beletew Abate","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1484403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional bone setting is widely practiced in Ethiopia, despite the lack of standardized training and associated risks. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of traditional bone setting service utilization and associated factors among trauma patients at Woldia Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted between April 9 and May 18, 2024. A total of 420 participants were selected using a consecutive sampling technique. Binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess the association between the independent variables and traditional bone setting service utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 patients with orthopedic injuries participated in the study. The prevalence of traditional bone setting utilization was 55.2% (95% CI: 50.44, 59.95). In a multivariable regression model, rural residency (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.39), low annual income (<21,000 Birr) (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.97, 8.37), use of health insurance (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.95), and extremity trauma (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.99) were significantly associated with traditional bone setting utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traditional bone setting utilization is common among rural, poor, and uninsured patients. Further research may be important to ensure its appropriate utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1484403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization and associated factors of traditional bone setting service among patients with musculoskeletal injuries in Northeast Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Mengesha Alemu Seid, Betelhem Walelgn, Ashenafi Kibret Sendekie, Getachew Tesfaw Walle, Melkamu Adamu Geremew, Mikiyas Haylu Sahlu, Simachew Asress Mekonen, Biruk Beletew Abate\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2025.1484403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional bone setting is widely practiced in Ethiopia, despite the lack of standardized training and associated risks. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of traditional bone setting service utilization and associated factors among trauma patients at Woldia Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted between April 9 and May 18, 2024. A total of 420 participants were selected using a consecutive sampling technique. Binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess the association between the independent variables and traditional bone setting service utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 patients with orthopedic injuries participated in the study. The prevalence of traditional bone setting utilization was 55.2% (95% CI: 50.44, 59.95). In a multivariable regression model, rural residency (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.39), low annual income (<21,000 Birr) (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.97, 8.37), use of health insurance (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.95), and extremity trauma (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.99) were significantly associated with traditional bone setting utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Traditional bone setting utilization is common among rural, poor, and uninsured patients. Further research may be important to ensure its appropriate utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1484403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1484403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1484403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管缺乏标准化的培训和相关的风险,传统的植骨在埃塞俄比亚被广泛实践。本研究旨在评估沃尔迪亚综合专科医院创伤患者传统植骨服务的使用率及其相关因素。方法:于2024年4月9日至5月18日进行基于机构的横断面研究。采用连续抽样的方法,共选取了420名参与者。采用二元和多元logistic回归评估自变量与传统植骨服务利用之间的关系。结果:共420例骨科损伤患者参与研究。传统植骨使用率为55.2% (95% CI: 50.44, 59.95)。在多变量回归模型中,农村居民(AOR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.39)、年收入低(结论:传统植骨在农村、贫困和无保险患者中普遍存在。进一步的研究可能是重要的,以确保其适当利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization and associated factors of traditional bone setting service among patients with musculoskeletal injuries in Northeast Ethiopia.

Background: Traditional bone setting is widely practiced in Ethiopia, despite the lack of standardized training and associated risks. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of traditional bone setting service utilization and associated factors among trauma patients at Woldia Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted between April 9 and May 18, 2024. A total of 420 participants were selected using a consecutive sampling technique. Binary and multiple logistic regressions were used to assess the association between the independent variables and traditional bone setting service utilization.

Results: A total of 420 patients with orthopedic injuries participated in the study. The prevalence of traditional bone setting utilization was 55.2% (95% CI: 50.44, 59.95). In a multivariable regression model, rural residency (AOR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.39), low annual income (<21,000 Birr) (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.97, 8.37), use of health insurance (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.95), and extremity trauma (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.11, 2.99) were significantly associated with traditional bone setting utilization.

Conclusion: Traditional bone setting utilization is common among rural, poor, and uninsured patients. Further research may be important to ensure its appropriate utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信