Jinghao Song, Yuekun Sun, Huaixue Mi, Shibin Sun, Hongxin Li
{"title":"经食管超声心动图引导下室间隔缺损合并房间隔缺损一站式器械关闭术。","authors":"Jinghao Song, Yuekun Sun, Huaixue Mi, Shibin Sun, Hongxin Li","doi":"10.31083/RCM26279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) with atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common complex congenital heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided percardiac or combined percutaneous techniques for treating VSD with ASD in patients with varying anatomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviewed 40 cases of VSD with ASD treated in our center from June 2015 to July 2023. Under TEE guidance, peratrial, perventricular, or combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches were used based on the VSD type and secundum-type ASD. Follow-up examinations, including electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and X-ray, were performed after surgery at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent surgery successfully (100%), with 24, 5, and 11 patients undergoing simultaneous closure via the peratrial, perventricular, and combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches, respectively. Among them, there were six cases of a mild residual shunt, three instances of a mild tricuspid regurgitation, two cases of a mild aortic valve regurgitation, one case of a mild mitral regurgitation, and three cases of an incomplete right bundle branch block, all observed after VSD closure; all had resolved within 6 months of the operation. The chi-square test showed no significant differences in adverse event rates among the three surgical approaches (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.09, <i>df</i> = 2, <i>p</i> = 0.957). The Friedman test compared the preoperative and postoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter for the three approaches, providing <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.589, and <i>p</i> = 0.445, respectively. None of the patients required reoperation during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under TEE guidance, using diverse percardiac or combined percutaneous device closure techniques for the one-stop treatment of different types of VSDs combined with ASD is safe, effective, and feasible. These approaches can be performed as a valuable alternative therapy for selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"26279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Stop Device Closure for Ventricular Septal Defect with Atrial Septal Defect Guided by Transesophageal Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Jinghao Song, Yuekun Sun, Huaixue Mi, Shibin Sun, Hongxin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM26279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular septal defect (VSD) with atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common complex congenital heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided percardiac or combined percutaneous techniques for treating VSD with ASD in patients with varying anatomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviewed 40 cases of VSD with ASD treated in our center from June 2015 to July 2023. Under TEE guidance, peratrial, perventricular, or combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches were used based on the VSD type and secundum-type ASD. Follow-up examinations, including electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and X-ray, were performed after surgery at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent surgery successfully (100%), with 24, 5, and 11 patients undergoing simultaneous closure via the peratrial, perventricular, and combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches, respectively. Among them, there were six cases of a mild residual shunt, three instances of a mild tricuspid regurgitation, two cases of a mild aortic valve regurgitation, one case of a mild mitral regurgitation, and three cases of an incomplete right bundle branch block, all observed after VSD closure; all had resolved within 6 months of the operation. The chi-square test showed no significant differences in adverse event rates among the three surgical approaches (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.09, <i>df</i> = 2, <i>p</i> = 0.957). The Friedman test compared the preoperative and postoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter for the three approaches, providing <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.589, and <i>p</i> = 0.445, respectively. None of the patients required reoperation during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under TEE guidance, using diverse percardiac or combined percutaneous device closure techniques for the one-stop treatment of different types of VSDs combined with ASD is safe, effective, and feasible. These approaches can be performed as a valuable alternative therapy for selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"26279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059751/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26279\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:室间隔缺损(VSD)合并房间隔缺损(ASD)是一种常见的复杂先天性心脏病。本研究旨在评价经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导下经心或联合经皮技术治疗不同解剖结构的VSD合并ASD患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性队列研究回顾了2015年6月至2023年7月在我中心治疗的40例室间隔间隔合并ASD。在TEE指导下,根据VSD类型和二次型ASD采用经房、经室或经心/经皮联合入路。术后24小时、1、3、6、12个月和每年进行随访检查,包括心电图、经胸超声心动图和x线检查。结果:所有患者均成功完成手术(100%),分别有24例、5例和11例患者同时通过经心房、经心室和经心/经皮联合入路进行闭合。其中6例为轻度残留分流,3例为轻度三尖瓣反流,2例为轻度主动脉瓣反流,1例为轻度二尖瓣反流,3例为不完全右束支阻塞,均为室间隔关闭后观察到的;所有患者均在手术后6个月内痊愈。卡方检验显示,三种手术入路不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2 = 0.09, df = 2, p = 0.957)。Friedman检验比较了三种入路术前和术后左心室舒张末期内径,分别得出p < 0.001, p = 0.589和p = 0.445。随访期间无患者再次手术。结论:TEE指导下,采用多种经心或联合经皮器械闭合技术对不同类型室间隔合并ASD进行一站式治疗是安全、有效、可行的。这些方法可以作为一种有价值的替代疗法,用于选定的患者。
One-Stop Device Closure for Ventricular Septal Defect with Atrial Septal Defect Guided by Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) with atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common complex congenital heart disease. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided percardiac or combined percutaneous techniques for treating VSD with ASD in patients with varying anatomies.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 40 cases of VSD with ASD treated in our center from June 2015 to July 2023. Under TEE guidance, peratrial, perventricular, or combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches were used based on the VSD type and secundum-type ASD. Follow-up examinations, including electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and X-ray, were performed after surgery at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly.
Results: All patients underwent surgery successfully (100%), with 24, 5, and 11 patients undergoing simultaneous closure via the peratrial, perventricular, and combined percardiac/percutaneous approaches, respectively. Among them, there were six cases of a mild residual shunt, three instances of a mild tricuspid regurgitation, two cases of a mild aortic valve regurgitation, one case of a mild mitral regurgitation, and three cases of an incomplete right bundle branch block, all observed after VSD closure; all had resolved within 6 months of the operation. The chi-square test showed no significant differences in adverse event rates among the three surgical approaches (χ2 = 0.09, df = 2, p = 0.957). The Friedman test compared the preoperative and postoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter for the three approaches, providing p < 0.001, p = 0.589, and p = 0.445, respectively. None of the patients required reoperation during the follow-up period.
Conclusions: Under TEE guidance, using diverse percardiac or combined percutaneous device closure techniques for the one-stop treatment of different types of VSDs combined with ASD is safe, effective, and feasible. These approaches can be performed as a valuable alternative therapy for selected patients.
期刊介绍:
RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.