在资源受限的环境中剖析自主权:斯里兰卡北部妇女对早期乳腺癌手术治疗决定的描述性定性研究。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ramya Kumar, Gopikha Sivakumar, Dhivya Thuseetharan, Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar
{"title":"在资源受限的环境中剖析自主权:斯里兰卡北部妇女对早期乳腺癌手术治疗决定的描述性定性研究。","authors":"Ramya Kumar, Gopikha Sivakumar, Dhivya Thuseetharan, Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer treatment is a contested space in which therapeutic decisions often collide with women's values and preferences. In northern Sri Lanka, mastectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) despite evidence of equivalent survival following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. This study explores autonomy in decision-making among women with EBC who were eligible for BCS and underwent mastectomy in northern Sri Lanka. A descriptive qualitative study was carried out among 15 women referred for adjuvant therapy to Tellippalai Trail Cancer Hospital in Jaffna district after having a mastectomy for EBC. Participants were recruited between January and May 2022 until data saturation was reached. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed in Tamil, translated into English, coded using QDA Miner Lite software, and analysed thematically. Women's autonomy in EBC treatment decisions is limited by various factors in northern Sri Lanka. The hospital setting is not conducive to informed decision-making, and women do not receive sufficient information. Neither survival rates nor risks/benefits of the surgical options are discussed in a systematic way. Although many women appear to be satisfied with their involvement in decision-making, their decisions are guided by incomplete information and fears of spread/recurrence communicated by treating teams. In the absence of policies and protocols to support patient autonomy, women \"choose\" the more invasive option: mastectomy. While it behoves medical professionals to provide evidence-based information, governments and the global health community must support strengthening healthcare systems to advance women's health and rights in lower-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":"33 1","pages":"2494396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.\",\"authors\":\"Ramya Kumar, Gopikha Sivakumar, Dhivya Thuseetharan, Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer treatment is a contested space in which therapeutic decisions often collide with women's values and preferences. In northern Sri Lanka, mastectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) despite evidence of equivalent survival following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. This study explores autonomy in decision-making among women with EBC who were eligible for BCS and underwent mastectomy in northern Sri Lanka. A descriptive qualitative study was carried out among 15 women referred for adjuvant therapy to Tellippalai Trail Cancer Hospital in Jaffna district after having a mastectomy for EBC. Participants were recruited between January and May 2022 until data saturation was reached. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed in Tamil, translated into English, coded using QDA Miner Lite software, and analysed thematically. Women's autonomy in EBC treatment decisions is limited by various factors in northern Sri Lanka. The hospital setting is not conducive to informed decision-making, and women do not receive sufficient information. Neither survival rates nor risks/benefits of the surgical options are discussed in a systematic way. Although many women appear to be satisfied with their involvement in decision-making, their decisions are guided by incomplete information and fears of spread/recurrence communicated by treating teams. In the absence of policies and protocols to support patient autonomy, women \\\"choose\\\" the more invasive option: mastectomy. While it behoves medical professionals to provide evidence-based information, governments and the global health community must support strengthening healthcare systems to advance women's health and rights in lower-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"2494396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2494396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌治疗是一个有争议的领域,治疗决策经常与女性的价值观和偏好发生冲突。在斯里兰卡北部,乳房切除术仍然是早期乳腺癌(EBC)手术治疗的主要方法,尽管有证据表明保乳手术(BCS)和放疗后的生存率相当。本研究探讨了斯里兰卡北部符合BCS条件并接受乳房切除术的EBC妇女的决策自主权。在贾夫纳地区的Tellippalai Trail癌症医院接受辅助治疗的乳房切除术后,对15名妇女进行了描述性定性研究。参与者在2022年1月至5月期间招募,直到达到数据饱和。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,用泰米尔语转录,翻译成英语,使用QDA Miner Lite软件编码,并进行主题分析。在斯里兰卡北部,妇女在EBC治疗决策方面的自主权受到各种因素的限制。医院环境不利于知情决策,妇女得不到充分的信息。生存率和手术选择的风险/收益都没有被系统地讨论。虽然许多妇女似乎对她们参与决策感到满意,但她们的决定受到治疗团队传达的不完整信息和对传播/复发的恐惧的指导。在缺乏支持患者自主的政策和协议的情况下,女性“选择”更具侵入性的选择:乳房切除术。虽然医疗专业人员有责任提供循证信息,但各国政府和全球卫生界必须支持加强卫生保健系统,以促进资源匮乏地区妇女的健康和权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissecting autonomy in a resource-constrained setting: a descriptive qualitative study of women's decisions on the surgical treatment of early breast cancer in northern Sri Lanka.

Breast cancer treatment is a contested space in which therapeutic decisions often collide with women's values and preferences. In northern Sri Lanka, mastectomy remains the mainstay of surgical treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) despite evidence of equivalent survival following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. This study explores autonomy in decision-making among women with EBC who were eligible for BCS and underwent mastectomy in northern Sri Lanka. A descriptive qualitative study was carried out among 15 women referred for adjuvant therapy to Tellippalai Trail Cancer Hospital in Jaffna district after having a mastectomy for EBC. Participants were recruited between January and May 2022 until data saturation was reached. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed in Tamil, translated into English, coded using QDA Miner Lite software, and analysed thematically. Women's autonomy in EBC treatment decisions is limited by various factors in northern Sri Lanka. The hospital setting is not conducive to informed decision-making, and women do not receive sufficient information. Neither survival rates nor risks/benefits of the surgical options are discussed in a systematic way. Although many women appear to be satisfied with their involvement in decision-making, their decisions are guided by incomplete information and fears of spread/recurrence communicated by treating teams. In the absence of policies and protocols to support patient autonomy, women "choose" the more invasive option: mastectomy. While it behoves medical professionals to provide evidence-based information, governments and the global health community must support strengthening healthcare systems to advance women's health and rights in lower-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信