探讨护理学生对临床环境中患者安全文化的看法:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Daniela Bartoníčková, Dominika Kohanová, Simona Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, Alison Steven, Katarína Žiaková
{"title":"探讨护理学生对临床环境中患者安全文化的看法:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Daniela Bartoníčková, Dominika Kohanová, Simona Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, Alison Steven, Katarína Žiaková","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process of experiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identify and address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through a mixed-method sequential study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hospital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from 16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with 12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most negatively rated survey dimensions were 'Frequency of events reported' (37.0%) and 'Nonpunitive responses to errors' (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were 'Indicators of good practice' (p ≤ 0.05). Based on the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, through Feeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in the qualitative phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events during clinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional development for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Bartoníčková, Dominika Kohanová, Simona Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, Alison Steven, Katarína Žiaková\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process of experiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identify and address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through a mixed-method sequential study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hospital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from 16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with 12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most negatively rated survey dimensions were 'Frequency of events reported' (37.0%) and 'Nonpunitive responses to errors' (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were 'Indicators of good practice' (p ≤ 0.05). Based on the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, through Feeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in the qualitative phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events during clinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional development for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者安全是本科护理学课程中不可缺少的组成部分。从实践中体验式学习的过程不仅在个人发展方面具有很高的价值,而且使学生能够识别和解决需要改进的患者安全关键领域。目的:通过一项混合方法序贯研究,探讨捷克护生在临床实践中对患者安全文化的认知。方法:采用混合方法收集2021 - 2024年的数据。定量阶段采用医院对护生患者安全文化的调查。来自捷克共和国16个学院的482名本科护理学生参加了这项研究。随后的定性阶段采用半结构化访谈与12名本科护理学生来自捷克共和国的一个学院。描述性和推断性统计方法用于分析定量结果,并辅以对定性数据的反思性专题分析。结果:负面评价最多的调查维度是“报告事件的频率”(37.0%)和“对错误的非惩罚性反应”(42.4%)。临床不良事件报告的预测因子为“良好实践指标”(p≤0.05)。在定量阶段的基础上,在定性阶段捕获了护理学生从接触不良事件,通过感觉断开和认知失调,到为患者安全文化发声的必要性的经历的解释之旅。结论:护生努力参与患者安全文化,特别是在报告临床实践中的不良事件。加强关于报告和标准的教育对学生至关重要,同时对临床工作人员的专业发展也至关重要,以使实践和文化保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Patient Safety Culture in Clinical Settings: A Mixed-Method Study.

Background: Patient safety in undergraduate nursing studies is an indispensable component of the curriculum. The process of experiential learning from practice is of high value not only in terms of personal development but also enables students to identify and address critical areas of patient safety that require improvement.

Aim: To explore Czech undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of patient safety culture during clinical practice through a mixed-method sequential study.

Methods: Data were collected between 2021 and 2024 using a mixed-method approach. The quantitative phase utilised the hospital survey on patient safety culture for nursing students. Four hundred and eighty-two undergraduate nursing students from 16 faculties across the Czech Republic participated. The subsequent qualitative phase employed semi-structured interviews with 12 undergraduate nursing students from one faculty in the Czech Republic. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyse quantitative results, complemented by a reflective thematic analysis of qualitative data.

Results: The most negatively rated survey dimensions were 'Frequency of events reported' (37.0%) and 'Nonpunitive responses to errors' (42.4%). Predictors for reporting adverse events in clinical practice were 'Indicators of good practice' (p ≤ 0.05). Based on the quantitative phase, the interpretive journey of nursing students' experiences from Exposure to adverse events, through Feeling disconnected and Cognitive dissonance, to the necessity of Speaking up for patient safety culture was captured in the qualitative phase.

Conclusions: Nursing students struggle to engage in a patient safety culture, particularly in reporting adverse events during clinical practice. Strengthening education on reporting and standards is essential for students, along with professional development for clinical staff to align practices and cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信