Sarthak Mohanty, Tomoyuki Asada, Tejas Subramanian, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Chad Z Simon, Nishtha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C Tuma, Maximilian K Korsun, Avani Sudhir Vaishnav, Eric Mai, Joshua Zhang, Cole T Kwas, Myles R J Allen, Eric T Kim, Annika Bay, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer
{"title":"退行性椎体滑脱单纯减压后进行原发性与改进性椎体滑脱的结果:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Sarthak Mohanty, Tomoyuki Asada, Tejas Subramanian, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Chad Z Simon, Nishtha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C Tuma, Maximilian K Korsun, Avani Sudhir Vaishnav, Eric Mai, Joshua Zhang, Cole T Kwas, Myles R J Allen, Eric T Kim, Annika Bay, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis is associated with lumbar instability, typically addressed with decompression and fusion to prevent iatrogenic instability. The SLIP trial indicated that decompression-only patients benefit significantly from early reoperation for instability. Yet, it's unclear how these revision patients' outcomes compare to those undergoing primary fusion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether outcomes were inferior among patients receiving revision transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) after prior decompression in the setting of degenerative, grade 1 spondylolisthesis when compared to those undergoing primary TLIF for grade 1 spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with grade 1 spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 or L5-S1 who underwent TLIF between 2018 and 2023 and had complete 1Y clinical follow-up and 6-month (6M) patient reported outcomes(PROs) were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>PROs (ODI, PROMIS, SF-12, VAS Pain) and Clinical (Readmission and Reoperation at 6-week [6W], 6M, and 1Y).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>No predictors for missing data were identified. Comparisons were made between primary fusion patients and those with prior decompression now undergoing revision TLIF. Bias was minimized via 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, comorbidities (CCI), slip percentage, slip translation, angular change, anterior and posterior disc height (ADH and PDH respectively), facet diastasis and cysts, and facet orientation-termed spondylolisthesis characteristics. Unmatched PROs and clinical outcomes were analyzed with a mixed-effects (ME) model and chi-Squared test, while matched PROs and clinical outcomes employed an ME model and conditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 285 patients (55.4% female, mean age 60.80±0.73, CCI of 2.10±0.09, and 35.1% current/former smokers) were included. Spondylolisthesis slip was 13.11%±0.99% with mean translation in flexion/extension of 1.60±0.19 mm. Compared to revision patients (N=42, 14.7%), primary fusion patients (N=243, 85.3%) were younger (59.70±0.77 vs. 67.20±1.76) and had a lower prevalence of active smoking (2.48% vs. 11.90%), but showed no differences in slip percentage (p=.480), translation in flexion/extension (p=.778), ADH (p=.578), PDH (p=.991), facet diastasis (p=.132), facet cysts (p=.550), or angular change across L3-S1. Preoperatively, PROs were comparable across all domains. At 1-year postop, no differences were observed in back pain (p=.430), leg pain (p=.346), SF-12 PCS (p=.976), MCS (p=.737), PROMIS Score (p=.063), or ODI (p=.362). The PSM cohort, matched for age, CCI, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, showed standardized differences of less than 0.10 for all demographics, baseline PROs, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, aside angular change at L5-S1 (3.05 vs. 7.08, p=.062). At 1 year postop, there were no differences in back pain (2.62 vs. 2.10, p=.414), leg pain (2.15 vs. 1.48, p=.270), SF-12 PCS (43.02 vs. 43.38, p=.888), SF-12 MCS (51.31 vs. 52.80, p=.553), PROMIS Score (45.69 vs. 44.81, p=.630), and ODI (18.66 vs. 15.26, p=.375). Finally, no significant differences were found in early (6W) or long-term (6M to 1Y) complications, with 98.1% primary and 90.5% revision patients complication-free at 6W, and 93.6% versus 100.0%, respectively, from 6M to 1Y.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis, patients having revision TLIF after decompression exhibit patient-reported and clinical outcomes similar to those undergoing primary TLIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of primary versus revision TLIF following decompression alone in degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective propensity score matched study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarthak Mohanty, Tomoyuki Asada, Tejas Subramanian, Kevin J DiSilvestro, Chad Z Simon, Nishtha Singh, Kasra Araghi, Olivia C Tuma, Maximilian K Korsun, Avani Sudhir Vaishnav, Eric Mai, Joshua Zhang, Cole T Kwas, Myles R J Allen, Eric T Kim, Annika Bay, Sheeraz A Qureshi, Sravisht Iyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis is associated with lumbar instability, typically addressed with decompression and fusion to prevent iatrogenic instability. The SLIP trial indicated that decompression-only patients benefit significantly from early reoperation for instability. Yet, it's unclear how these revision patients' outcomes compare to those undergoing primary fusion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether outcomes were inferior among patients receiving revision transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) after prior decompression in the setting of degenerative, grade 1 spondylolisthesis when compared to those undergoing primary TLIF for grade 1 spondylolisthesis.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients with grade 1 spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 or L5-S1 who underwent TLIF between 2018 and 2023 and had complete 1Y clinical follow-up and 6-month (6M) patient reported outcomes(PROs) were included.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>PROs (ODI, PROMIS, SF-12, VAS Pain) and Clinical (Readmission and Reoperation at 6-week [6W], 6M, and 1Y).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>No predictors for missing data were identified. Comparisons were made between primary fusion patients and those with prior decompression now undergoing revision TLIF. Bias was minimized via 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, comorbidities (CCI), slip percentage, slip translation, angular change, anterior and posterior disc height (ADH and PDH respectively), facet diastasis and cysts, and facet orientation-termed spondylolisthesis characteristics. Unmatched PROs and clinical outcomes were analyzed with a mixed-effects (ME) model and chi-Squared test, while matched PROs and clinical outcomes employed an ME model and conditional logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 285 patients (55.4% female, mean age 60.80±0.73, CCI of 2.10±0.09, and 35.1% current/former smokers) were included. Spondylolisthesis slip was 13.11%±0.99% with mean translation in flexion/extension of 1.60±0.19 mm. Compared to revision patients (N=42, 14.7%), primary fusion patients (N=243, 85.3%) were younger (59.70±0.77 vs. 67.20±1.76) and had a lower prevalence of active smoking (2.48% vs. 11.90%), but showed no differences in slip percentage (p=.480), translation in flexion/extension (p=.778), ADH (p=.578), PDH (p=.991), facet diastasis (p=.132), facet cysts (p=.550), or angular change across L3-S1. Preoperatively, PROs were comparable across all domains. At 1-year postop, no differences were observed in back pain (p=.430), leg pain (p=.346), SF-12 PCS (p=.976), MCS (p=.737), PROMIS Score (p=.063), or ODI (p=.362). The PSM cohort, matched for age, CCI, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, showed standardized differences of less than 0.10 for all demographics, baseline PROs, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, aside angular change at L5-S1 (3.05 vs. 7.08, p=.062). At 1 year postop, there were no differences in back pain (2.62 vs. 2.10, p=.414), leg pain (2.15 vs. 1.48, p=.270), SF-12 PCS (43.02 vs. 43.38, p=.888), SF-12 MCS (51.31 vs. 52.80, p=.553), PROMIS Score (45.69 vs. 44.81, p=.630), and ODI (18.66 vs. 15.26, p=.375). Finally, no significant differences were found in early (6W) or long-term (6M to 1Y) complications, with 98.1% primary and 90.5% revision patients complication-free at 6W, and 93.6% versus 100.0%, respectively, from 6M to 1Y.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis, patients having revision TLIF after decompression exhibit patient-reported and clinical outcomes similar to those undergoing primary TLIF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:退行性1级腰椎滑脱与腰椎不稳定有关,通常通过减压和融合来预防医源性不稳定。SLIP试验表明,单纯减压患者因不稳定而早期再手术获益显著。然而,尚不清楚这些翻修患者的结果与接受初次融合的患者相比如何。目的:评价退行性1级腰椎滑脱患者术前减压后接受改良型经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)的患者与接受原发性TLIF治疗1级腰椎滑脱患者的预后是否较差。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。患者样本:纳入2018-2023年间接受TLIF的L4-L5或L5-S1级1级腰椎滑脱患者,并进行了1年的临床随访,患者报告的结果(PROs)为6个月(6M)。结果指标:PROs (ODI、PROMIS、SF-12、VAS Pain)和Clinical(6周(6W)、6M和1Y时再入院和再手术)。方法:未发现缺失数据的预测因子。将初次融合患者与先前减压的患者进行TLIF翻修进行比较。通过2:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)对年龄、合并症(CCI)、滑移百分率、滑移平移、角度变化、前后椎间盘高度(分别为ADH和PDH)、关节突移位和囊肿以及关节突定位(称为脊柱滑脱特征)进行最小化偏差。未匹配的PROs和临床结果采用混合效应(ME)模型和卡方检验进行分析,匹配的PROs和临床结果采用混合效应(ME)模型和条件logistic回归。结果:共纳入285例患者(女性55.4%,平均年龄60.80±0.73,CCI 2.10±0.09,吸烟/戒烟者35.1%)。脊柱滑脱滑移率为13.11%±0.99%,平均屈伸平移1.60±0.19 mm。与翻修患者(N=42, 14.7%)相比,初次融合患者(N=243, 85.3%)更年轻(59.70±0.77 vs 67.20±1.76),主动吸烟的患病率更低(2.48% vs 11.90%),但在滑移率(p=0.480)、屈伸平移(p=0.778)、ADH(p=0.578)、PDH(p=0.991)、小关节滑脱(p=0.132)、小关节囊肿(p=0.550)或L3-S1的角度变化方面没有差异。术前,各领域的PROs具有可比性。术后1年,腰痛(p=0.430)、腿痛(p=0.346)、SF-12 PCS(p=0.976)、MCS(p=0.737)、PROMIS评分(p=0.063)、ODI(p=0.362)均无差异。PSM队列,匹配年龄、CCI和脊柱滑脱特征,除L5-S1的角度变化外,所有人口统计学、基线PROs和脊柱滑脱特征的标准化差异小于0.10 (3.05 vs. 7.08, p=0.062)。术后1年,两组患者腰痛(2.62 vs. 2.10, p=0.414)、腿痛(2.15 vs. 1.48, p=0.270)、SF-12 PCS (43.02 vs. 43.38, p=0.888)、SF-12 MCS (51.31 vs. 52.80, p=0.553)、PROMIS评分(45.69 vs. 44.81, p=0.630)、ODI (18.66 vs. 15.26, p=0.375)无差异。最后,在早期(6W)和长期(6M至1Y)并发症方面没有发现显著差异,98.1%的原发性和90.5%的翻修患者在6W时无并发症,93.6%对100.0%,从6M到1Y。结论:单纯减压治疗1级滑脱患者,减压后行改良TLIF的患者表现出与初次TLIF患者相似的患者报告和临床结果。
Outcomes of primary versus revision TLIF following decompression alone in degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective propensity score matched study.
Background: Degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis is associated with lumbar instability, typically addressed with decompression and fusion to prevent iatrogenic instability. The SLIP trial indicated that decompression-only patients benefit significantly from early reoperation for instability. Yet, it's unclear how these revision patients' outcomes compare to those undergoing primary fusion.
Purpose: To evaluate whether outcomes were inferior among patients receiving revision transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) after prior decompression in the setting of degenerative, grade 1 spondylolisthesis when compared to those undergoing primary TLIF for grade 1 spondylolisthesis.
Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.
Patient sample: Patients with grade 1 spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 or L5-S1 who underwent TLIF between 2018 and 2023 and had complete 1Y clinical follow-up and 6-month (6M) patient reported outcomes(PROs) were included.
Outcome measures: PROs (ODI, PROMIS, SF-12, VAS Pain) and Clinical (Readmission and Reoperation at 6-week [6W], 6M, and 1Y).
Methods: No predictors for missing data were identified. Comparisons were made between primary fusion patients and those with prior decompression now undergoing revision TLIF. Bias was minimized via 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, comorbidities (CCI), slip percentage, slip translation, angular change, anterior and posterior disc height (ADH and PDH respectively), facet diastasis and cysts, and facet orientation-termed spondylolisthesis characteristics. Unmatched PROs and clinical outcomes were analyzed with a mixed-effects (ME) model and chi-Squared test, while matched PROs and clinical outcomes employed an ME model and conditional logistic regression.
Results: About 285 patients (55.4% female, mean age 60.80±0.73, CCI of 2.10±0.09, and 35.1% current/former smokers) were included. Spondylolisthesis slip was 13.11%±0.99% with mean translation in flexion/extension of 1.60±0.19 mm. Compared to revision patients (N=42, 14.7%), primary fusion patients (N=243, 85.3%) were younger (59.70±0.77 vs. 67.20±1.76) and had a lower prevalence of active smoking (2.48% vs. 11.90%), but showed no differences in slip percentage (p=.480), translation in flexion/extension (p=.778), ADH (p=.578), PDH (p=.991), facet diastasis (p=.132), facet cysts (p=.550), or angular change across L3-S1. Preoperatively, PROs were comparable across all domains. At 1-year postop, no differences were observed in back pain (p=.430), leg pain (p=.346), SF-12 PCS (p=.976), MCS (p=.737), PROMIS Score (p=.063), or ODI (p=.362). The PSM cohort, matched for age, CCI, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, showed standardized differences of less than 0.10 for all demographics, baseline PROs, and spondylolisthesis characteristics, aside angular change at L5-S1 (3.05 vs. 7.08, p=.062). At 1 year postop, there were no differences in back pain (2.62 vs. 2.10, p=.414), leg pain (2.15 vs. 1.48, p=.270), SF-12 PCS (43.02 vs. 43.38, p=.888), SF-12 MCS (51.31 vs. 52.80, p=.553), PROMIS Score (45.69 vs. 44.81, p=.630), and ODI (18.66 vs. 15.26, p=.375). Finally, no significant differences were found in early (6W) or long-term (6M to 1Y) complications, with 98.1% primary and 90.5% revision patients complication-free at 6W, and 93.6% versus 100.0%, respectively, from 6M to 1Y.
Conclusion: Following decompression alone for grade 1 spondylolisthesis, patients having revision TLIF after decompression exhibit patient-reported and clinical outcomes similar to those undergoing primary TLIF.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.