网膜内皮角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术视力效果的比较。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Teyyeb Azeem Janjua, Anam Hassan, Waqar Muzaffar, Shagufta Parveen, Muhammad Shahid, Jawwad Ahmad
{"title":"网膜内皮角膜移植术与穿透性角膜移植术视力效果的比较。","authors":"Teyyeb Azeem Janjua, Anam Hassan, Waqar Muzaffar, Shagufta Parveen, Muhammad Shahid, Jawwad Ahmad","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.04.463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the visual outcome in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Eye, The Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 2022 to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective analysis of fourteen patients who underwent PKP in comparison with another group of fourteen patients who got the DMEK surgery was done. The evaluation of visual and refractive outcomes was done postoperatively. Fisher's exact test was used to compare visual acuity grouped into categories between two surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen eyes from each group that were PKP and DMEK were included in the analysis. The best corrected visual acuity after 6 months was better in the DMEK group compared with the PKP group (p = 0.003) and these results were consistent after twelve months (p = 0.006) keeping the DMEK group superior in visual outcome over the PKP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PKP and DMEK play distinct roles in the treatment of corneal disorders, each with its own set of indications. However, DMEK resulted in a better visual outcome when compared to the PKP. Although quality of life improved in both groups, it was found to be better in the DMEK group compared to the PKP group.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Visual acuity, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Penetrating keratoplasty, Corneal transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":"35 4","pages":"463-467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Visual Outcome of Successful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Teyyeb Azeem Janjua, Anam Hassan, Waqar Muzaffar, Shagufta Parveen, Muhammad Shahid, Jawwad Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.04.463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the visual outcome in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Eye, The Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 2022 to June 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective analysis of fourteen patients who underwent PKP in comparison with another group of fourteen patients who got the DMEK surgery was done. The evaluation of visual and refractive outcomes was done postoperatively. Fisher's exact test was used to compare visual acuity grouped into categories between two surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen eyes from each group that were PKP and DMEK were included in the analysis. The best corrected visual acuity after 6 months was better in the DMEK group compared with the PKP group (p = 0.003) and these results were consistent after twelve months (p = 0.006) keeping the DMEK group superior in visual outcome over the PKP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PKP and DMEK play distinct roles in the treatment of corneal disorders, each with its own set of indications. However, DMEK resulted in a better visual outcome when compared to the PKP. Although quality of life improved in both groups, it was found to be better in the DMEK group compared to the PKP group.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Visual acuity, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Penetrating keratoplasty, Corneal transplant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"463-467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.04.463\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.04.463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较穿透性角膜移植术(PKP)与真皮膜内皮角膜移植术(DMEK)的视力效果。研究设计:准实验研究。研究地点和时间:2022年1月至2023年6月,巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第武装部队眼科研究所眼学系。方法:对14例PKP患者与另一组14例DMEK手术患者进行前瞻性分析。术后对视力和屈光结果进行评估。Fisher精确检验被用来比较两种外科手术的视敏度。结果:PKP组和DMEK组各14只眼纳入分析。DMEK组6个月后的最佳矫正视力优于PKP组(p = 0.003), 12个月后的结果一致(p = 0.006), DMEK组的视力优于PKP组。结论:PKP和DMEK在角膜疾病的治疗中作用明显,各有其适应证。然而,与PKP相比,DMEK的视觉效果更好。虽然两组患者的生活质量都有所改善,但DMEK组比PKP组的生活质量更好。关键词:视力,Descemet膜内皮角膜移植,穿透性角膜移植,角膜移植
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Visual Outcome of Successful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Objective: To compare the visual outcome in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Study design: A quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Eye, The Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 2022 to June 2023.

Methodology: A prospective analysis of fourteen patients who underwent PKP in comparison with another group of fourteen patients who got the DMEK surgery was done. The evaluation of visual and refractive outcomes was done postoperatively. Fisher's exact test was used to compare visual acuity grouped into categories between two surgical procedures.

Results: Fourteen eyes from each group that were PKP and DMEK were included in the analysis. The best corrected visual acuity after 6 months was better in the DMEK group compared with the PKP group (p = 0.003) and these results were consistent after twelve months (p = 0.006) keeping the DMEK group superior in visual outcome over the PKP group.

Conclusion: PKP and DMEK play distinct roles in the treatment of corneal disorders, each with its own set of indications. However, DMEK resulted in a better visual outcome when compared to the PKP. Although quality of life improved in both groups, it was found to be better in the DMEK group compared to the PKP group.

Key words: Visual acuity, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Penetrating keratoplasty, Corneal transplant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信