了解在物理治疗师实践中使用腰痛临床实践指南的障碍:混合方法方法。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Matthew R Schumacher, Kyle A Cottone, Laura M Siviter, Casey J Rentmeester, Daniel I Rhon, Jodi L Young
{"title":"了解在物理治疗师实践中使用腰痛临床实践指南的障碍:混合方法方法。","authors":"Matthew R Schumacher, Kyle A Cottone, Laura M Siviter, Casey J Rentmeester, Daniel I Rhon, Jodi L Young","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Low adherence rates to low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by physical therapists have been reported in the United States (US); however, no studies have explored barriers to their use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore perceived barriers physical therapists face for implementing the most recent LBP CPG from American Physical Therapy Association Orthopaedic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a convergent parallel mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This was completed virtually.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 173 US outpatient physical therapists completed the survey, with 20 participating in focused interviews.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s) or exposure(s): </strong>Participants completed an online survey and semi-structured virtual interviews.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s) and measure(s): </strong>The primary outcomes were the top barriers identified through survey data and thematic analysis of interviews. A thematic analysis was implemented for the qualitative analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to model relationships between demographic variables, barriers, and CPG use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes related to barriers to CPG implementation were identified through interviews including a lack of individualized care, a lack of skills/confidence, patient expectations/perceptions, previous experience, time limitations, and proper understanding of the guidelines. Participants who completed an orthopaedic residency program were more likely to report the barrier of \"difficulties with 1-on-1 care\" (OR = 8.70, 95% CI = 2.12-39.22). Individuals practicing between 1 to 5 years (OR = 7.49, 95% CI = 1.39-52.75) compared to 20+ years and those reporting regular use of the CPG (OR = 5.81, 95% CI = 1.99-21.51) were more likely to report the barrier of \"concern for patient's response.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Novice clinicians and those who completed orthopaedic residency reported barriers to CPG use. Six major themes related to barriers for implementing the CPG were identified, consistent with majority of the barriers reported in the survey, demonstrating the convergence of analyses. The most common barrier was the perception of sacrificing individualized care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study may help improve adoption and implementation of CPGs in real-world clinical practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Barriers to the Use of a Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guideline in Physical Therapist Practice: A Mixed-Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R Schumacher, Kyle A Cottone, Laura M Siviter, Casey J Rentmeester, Daniel I Rhon, Jodi L Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Low adherence rates to low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by physical therapists have been reported in the United States (US); however, no studies have explored barriers to their use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore perceived barriers physical therapists face for implementing the most recent LBP CPG from American Physical Therapy Association Orthopaedic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a convergent parallel mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This was completed virtually.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 173 US outpatient physical therapists completed the survey, with 20 participating in focused interviews.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s) or exposure(s): </strong>Participants completed an online survey and semi-structured virtual interviews.</p><p><strong>Main outcome(s) and measure(s): </strong>The primary outcomes were the top barriers identified through survey data and thematic analysis of interviews. A thematic analysis was implemented for the qualitative analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to model relationships between demographic variables, barriers, and CPG use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes related to barriers to CPG implementation were identified through interviews including a lack of individualized care, a lack of skills/confidence, patient expectations/perceptions, previous experience, time limitations, and proper understanding of the guidelines. Participants who completed an orthopaedic residency program were more likely to report the barrier of \\\"difficulties with 1-on-1 care\\\" (OR = 8.70, 95% CI = 2.12-39.22). Individuals practicing between 1 to 5 years (OR = 7.49, 95% CI = 1.39-52.75) compared to 20+ years and those reporting regular use of the CPG (OR = 5.81, 95% CI = 1.99-21.51) were more likely to report the barrier of \\\"concern for patient's response.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Novice clinicians and those who completed orthopaedic residency reported barriers to CPG use. Six major themes related to barriers for implementing the CPG were identified, consistent with majority of the barriers reported in the survey, demonstrating the convergence of analyses. The most common barrier was the perception of sacrificing individualized care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>This study may help improve adoption and implementation of CPGs in real-world clinical practice settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf059\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:据报道,在美国,物理治疗师对腰痛(LBP)临床实践指南(CPGs)的依从率较低;然而,没有研究探索它们使用的障碍。目的:本研究的目的是探讨物理治疗师在实施美国骨科物理治疗协会最新的LBP CPG时所面临的感知障碍。设计:这是一个收敛并行混合方法设计。设置:虚拟完成。参与者:共有173名美国门诊物理治疗师完成了调查,其中20人参加了重点访谈。干预或暴露:参与者完成了一项在线调查和半结构化的虚拟访谈。主要结果和措施:主要结果是通过调查数据和访谈的专题分析确定的主要障碍。采用专题分析进行定性分析。采用二元逻辑回归对人口变量、障碍和CPG使用之间的关系进行建模。结果:通过访谈确定了与CPG实施障碍相关的六个主题,包括缺乏个性化护理、缺乏技能/信心、患者期望/感知、以前的经验、时间限制和对指南的正确理解。完成骨科住院医师项目的参与者更有可能报告“一对一护理困难”的障碍(OR = 8.70, 95% CI = 2.12-39.22)。从业1 -5年(OR = 7.49, 95% CI = 1.39-52.75)的患者与从业20年以上的患者相比,经常使用CPG的患者(OR = 5.81, 95% CI = 1.99-21.51)更有可能报告“关心患者反应”的障碍。结论:临床新手和完成骨科住院医师培训的临床医生报告了CPG使用的障碍。确定了与实施CPG的障碍有关的六个主要主题,与调查中报告的大多数障碍一致,表明了分析的趋同性。最常见的障碍是牺牲个性化护理的观念。影响:本研究可能有助于提高CPGs在现实世界临床实践中的采用和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Barriers to the Use of a Low Back Pain Clinical Practice Guideline in Physical Therapist Practice: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Importance: Low adherence rates to low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) by physical therapists have been reported in the United States (US); however, no studies have explored barriers to their use.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore perceived barriers physical therapists face for implementing the most recent LBP CPG from American Physical Therapy Association Orthopaedic.

Design: This was a convergent parallel mixed-methods design.

Setting: This was completed virtually.

Participants: A total of 173 US outpatient physical therapists completed the survey, with 20 participating in focused interviews.

Intervention(s) or exposure(s): Participants completed an online survey and semi-structured virtual interviews.

Main outcome(s) and measure(s): The primary outcomes were the top barriers identified through survey data and thematic analysis of interviews. A thematic analysis was implemented for the qualitative analysis. A binary logistic regression was used to model relationships between demographic variables, barriers, and CPG use.

Results: Six themes related to barriers to CPG implementation were identified through interviews including a lack of individualized care, a lack of skills/confidence, patient expectations/perceptions, previous experience, time limitations, and proper understanding of the guidelines. Participants who completed an orthopaedic residency program were more likely to report the barrier of "difficulties with 1-on-1 care" (OR = 8.70, 95% CI = 2.12-39.22). Individuals practicing between 1 to 5 years (OR = 7.49, 95% CI = 1.39-52.75) compared to 20+ years and those reporting regular use of the CPG (OR = 5.81, 95% CI = 1.99-21.51) were more likely to report the barrier of "concern for patient's response."

Conclusion: Novice clinicians and those who completed orthopaedic residency reported barriers to CPG use. Six major themes related to barriers for implementing the CPG were identified, consistent with majority of the barriers reported in the survey, demonstrating the convergence of analyses. The most common barrier was the perception of sacrificing individualized care.

Impact: This study may help improve adoption and implementation of CPGs in real-world clinical practice settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信