检验自愿互惠利他主义和集体主义干预在增强年轻非献血者献血意愿中的作用:一项实验研究。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Caoimhín Duffy, Gerard J Molloy
{"title":"检验自愿互惠利他主义和集体主义干预在增强年轻非献血者献血意愿中的作用:一项实验研究。","authors":"Caoimhín Duffy, Gerard J Molloy","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2025.2496227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate (i) if an enhanced Voluntary Reciprocal Altruism (VRA) intervention increases intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, (ii) if a Collectivism intervention enhances intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, and (iii) to ascertain if there is an interaction effect between VRA and Collectivism interventions on registration seeking and donation intentions.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>A two-way-between-subjects randomised control design was implemented. The dependent variables were intentions to donate and registration seeking, while the independent variables were VRA (VRA and Control) and Collectivism (Collectivism and Individualism). A total of 211 young adult participants were included in the analysis. The participants were randomised into four conditions. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to evaluate differences in intentions to donate, while Chi-Square analysis was used to investigate registration seeking across each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in once-off intentions to donate blood among participants receiving the VRA intervention compared to the control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.54). However, the Collectivism intervention had no significant effect on donation intentions or registration seeking. No interaction effect was detected between VRA and Collectivism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VRA intervention significantly influenced once-off intentions to donate and may be a cost-effective strategy to recruit new blood donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of voluntary reciprocal altruism and collectivism interventions in enhancing intentions to donate blood among young non-donors: an experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Caoimhín Duffy, Gerard J Molloy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2025.2496227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate (i) if an enhanced Voluntary Reciprocal Altruism (VRA) intervention increases intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, (ii) if a Collectivism intervention enhances intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, and (iii) to ascertain if there is an interaction effect between VRA and Collectivism interventions on registration seeking and donation intentions.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>A two-way-between-subjects randomised control design was implemented. The dependent variables were intentions to donate and registration seeking, while the independent variables were VRA (VRA and Control) and Collectivism (Collectivism and Individualism). A total of 211 young adult participants were included in the analysis. The participants were randomised into four conditions. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to evaluate differences in intentions to donate, while Chi-Square analysis was used to investigate registration seeking across each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in once-off intentions to donate blood among participants receiving the VRA intervention compared to the control group (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.54). However, the Collectivism intervention had no significant effect on donation intentions or registration seeking. No interaction effect was detected between VRA and Collectivism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The VRA intervention significantly influenced once-off intentions to donate and may be a cost-effective strategy to recruit new blood donors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2496227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2496227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估(i)增强的自愿互惠利他主义(VRA)干预是否会增加献血意愿和寻求注册意愿,(ii)集体主义干预是否会增强献血意愿和寻求注册意愿,以及(iii)确定VRA和集体主义干预对寻求注册意愿和捐赠意愿之间是否存在交互作用。方法和措施:采用双受试者随机对照设计。因变量为捐赠意向和登记寻求,自变量为VRA (VRA和Control)和Collectivism(集体主义和个人主义)。共有211名年轻人参与了分析。参与者被随机分为四种情况。采用双向方差分析来评估捐赠意愿的差异,而卡方分析用于调查每种情况下的注册寻求。结果:与对照组相比,接受VRA干预的参与者的一次性献血意愿有显著差异(Cohen’s d = 0.54)。然而,集体主义干预对捐赠意愿和登记寻求没有显著影响。VRA与集体主义之间无交互作用。结论:VRA干预显著影响了一次性献血意愿,可能是招募新献血者的一种经济有效的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the role of voluntary reciprocal altruism and collectivism interventions in enhancing intentions to donate blood among young non-donors: an experimental study.

Objective: To evaluate (i) if an enhanced Voluntary Reciprocal Altruism (VRA) intervention increases intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, (ii) if a Collectivism intervention enhances intentions to donate blood and registration seeking, and (iii) to ascertain if there is an interaction effect between VRA and Collectivism interventions on registration seeking and donation intentions.

Methods and measures: A two-way-between-subjects randomised control design was implemented. The dependent variables were intentions to donate and registration seeking, while the independent variables were VRA (VRA and Control) and Collectivism (Collectivism and Individualism). A total of 211 young adult participants were included in the analysis. The participants were randomised into four conditions. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to evaluate differences in intentions to donate, while Chi-Square analysis was used to investigate registration seeking across each condition.

Results: There was a significant difference in once-off intentions to donate blood among participants receiving the VRA intervention compared to the control group (Cohen's d = 0.54). However, the Collectivism intervention had no significant effect on donation intentions or registration seeking. No interaction effect was detected between VRA and Collectivism.

Conclusions: The VRA intervention significantly influenced once-off intentions to donate and may be a cost-effective strategy to recruit new blood donors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信