{"title":"I-III期胃癌手术中抗生素使用与预后的关系","authors":"Lijuan Ding, Mengyu Zhou, Jiahui Yin, Xiaoming Zhang, Qianwen Ye, Niansong Qian","doi":"10.1177/10732748251339261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The use of antibiotic (Abx) is common in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing radical resection; however, the prognostic value of the use of these agents in stage I-III patients remains largely unknown.<b>Methods:</b> Data concerning the use of Abx in GC patients during surgery including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and types of Abx, were collected retrospectively. Differences in clinical features between cDDD subgroups and type subgroups were compared. Overall survival (OS) differences were tested via the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for survival were validated by a Cox proportional hazards model.<b>Results:</b> Of 162 patients enrolled, 81 were assigned to the low-cDDD and 81 to the high-cDDD group. Among them, 19 patients were assigned to ≤2 types and 143 to ≥3 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups of patients presented no significant difference in OS (log rank = 2.21, <i>P</i> = 0.137). Patients receiving ≥3 types presented significantly better OS (log rank = 4.58, <i>P</i> = 0.032) than those receiving ≤2 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups (log rank = 3.83, <i>P</i> = 0.050), but not the ≤2 and ≥3 type subgroups (log rank<0.01, <i>P</i> = 0.982), presented a significant difference in OS in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. These differences were maintained in patients without total gastrectomy (cDDD: log rank = 7.92, <i>P</i> = 0.005; types: log rank = 6.52, <i>P</i> = 0.011). The use of multiple Abx types was validated as an independent factor for OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90; <i>P</i> = 0.024).<b>Conclusions:</b> Abx use during surgery in patients with stage I-III GC may potentially correlate with the prognosis. Patients with ≥3 types of Abx were more likely to have good outcomes, particularly in those without total gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251339261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Antibiotic Used During Surgery With the Outcome in Stage I-III Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Lijuan Ding, Mengyu Zhou, Jiahui Yin, Xiaoming Zhang, Qianwen Ye, Niansong Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748251339261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The use of antibiotic (Abx) is common in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing radical resection; however, the prognostic value of the use of these agents in stage I-III patients remains largely unknown.<b>Methods:</b> Data concerning the use of Abx in GC patients during surgery including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and types of Abx, were collected retrospectively. Differences in clinical features between cDDD subgroups and type subgroups were compared. Overall survival (OS) differences were tested via the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for survival were validated by a Cox proportional hazards model.<b>Results:</b> Of 162 patients enrolled, 81 were assigned to the low-cDDD and 81 to the high-cDDD group. Among them, 19 patients were assigned to ≤2 types and 143 to ≥3 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups of patients presented no significant difference in OS (log rank = 2.21, <i>P</i> = 0.137). Patients receiving ≥3 types presented significantly better OS (log rank = 4.58, <i>P</i> = 0.032) than those receiving ≤2 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups (log rank = 3.83, <i>P</i> = 0.050), but not the ≤2 and ≥3 type subgroups (log rank<0.01, <i>P</i> = 0.982), presented a significant difference in OS in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. These differences were maintained in patients without total gastrectomy (cDDD: log rank = 7.92, <i>P</i> = 0.005; types: log rank = 6.52, <i>P</i> = 0.011). The use of multiple Abx types was validated as an independent factor for OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90; <i>P</i> = 0.024).<b>Conclusions:</b> Abx use during surgery in patients with stage I-III GC may potentially correlate with the prognosis. Patients with ≥3 types of Abx were more likely to have good outcomes, particularly in those without total gastrectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"10732748251339261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251339261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:抗生素(Abx)的使用在胃癌(GC)根治患者中很常见;然而,在I-III期患者中使用这些药物的预后价值在很大程度上仍然未知。方法:回顾性收集胃癌患者手术期间Abx使用的资料,包括累积限定日剂量(cDDD)和Abx的类型。比较cDDD亚组与型亚组临床特征的差异。通过Kaplan-Meier法检验总生存(OS)差异,并通过Cox比例风险模型验证生存的危险因素。结果:纳入的162例患者中,81例被分配到低cddd组,81例被分配到高cddd组。其中≤2型19例,≥3型143例。低、高cddd亚组患者OS差异无统计学意义(log rank = 2.21, P = 0.137)。≥3种类型患者的OS明显优于≤2种类型患者(log rank = 4.58, P = 0.032)。全胃切除术患者的OS在低、高cddd亚组(log rank = 3.83, P = 0.050)和≤2、≥3型亚组(log rank = 0.982)无显著差异(log rank = 3.83, P = 0.050)。这些差异在未全胃切除术的患者中保持不变(cDDD: log rank = 7.92, P = 0.005;类型:log rank = 6.52, P = 0.011)。多种Abx类型的使用被证实是OS的一个独立因素(HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90;P = 0.024)。结论:I-III期胃癌患者手术期间使用Abx可能与预后潜在相关。Abx≥3型的患者更有可能获得良好的预后,特别是那些没有进行全胃切除术的患者。
Association of Antibiotic Used During Surgery With the Outcome in Stage I-III Gastric Cancer.
Introduction: The use of antibiotic (Abx) is common in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing radical resection; however, the prognostic value of the use of these agents in stage I-III patients remains largely unknown.Methods: Data concerning the use of Abx in GC patients during surgery including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and types of Abx, were collected retrospectively. Differences in clinical features between cDDD subgroups and type subgroups were compared. Overall survival (OS) differences were tested via the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for survival were validated by a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: Of 162 patients enrolled, 81 were assigned to the low-cDDD and 81 to the high-cDDD group. Among them, 19 patients were assigned to ≤2 types and 143 to ≥3 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups of patients presented no significant difference in OS (log rank = 2.21, P = 0.137). Patients receiving ≥3 types presented significantly better OS (log rank = 4.58, P = 0.032) than those receiving ≤2 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups (log rank = 3.83, P = 0.050), but not the ≤2 and ≥3 type subgroups (log rank<0.01, P = 0.982), presented a significant difference in OS in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. These differences were maintained in patients without total gastrectomy (cDDD: log rank = 7.92, P = 0.005; types: log rank = 6.52, P = 0.011). The use of multiple Abx types was validated as an independent factor for OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90; P = 0.024).Conclusions: Abx use during surgery in patients with stage I-III GC may potentially correlate with the prognosis. Patients with ≥3 types of Abx were more likely to have good outcomes, particularly in those without total gastrectomy.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.