使用5-0快速吸收肠缝合线修复儿童面部撕裂伤的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Richard Thompson, Matthew Wilkinson, Patrick D Combs, Lina Palomares, Andrew J Kienstra
{"title":"使用5-0快速吸收肠缝合线修复儿童面部撕裂伤的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Richard Thompson, Matthew Wilkinson, Patrick D Combs, Lina Palomares, Andrew J Kienstra","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare 2 methods of repairing simple pediatric facial lacerations. We hypothesized that wounds repaired with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures and overlying adhesive strips would be superior with regard to cosmetic outcome compared with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 0 to 17 years old presenting to the emergency department with simple, linear facial lacerations requiring repair with sutures were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned to repair with either 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips or 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone. Families were contacted by phone at 2 weeks to discuss complications. At 2 months, participants were sent a secure link to upload photos of the scar electronically. The scars were then evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by a blinded Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physician and Pediatric Plastic Surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were enrolled, and 81 photos were received. The VAS scores for the fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips group were similar to the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group (53.9 vs. 54.5 mm, P=0.87). The Lin Correlation Coefficient was 0.74, indicating strong agreement between the raters. There was no significant difference in time to completion or ease of repair. There was only one complication due to infection in the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group, and one reported partial wound dehiscence in the same group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using adhesive strips overlying fast-absorbing gut sutures leads to a similar cosmetic outcome as using fast-absorbing gut sutures alone for simple facial laceration repair. While this technique did not show improved cosmesis or increased complications, it could be considered in select patients or may not be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair Using 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Sutures With and Without Overlying Adhesive Strips: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Thompson, Matthew Wilkinson, Patrick D Combs, Lina Palomares, Andrew J Kienstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare 2 methods of repairing simple pediatric facial lacerations. We hypothesized that wounds repaired with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures and overlying adhesive strips would be superior with regard to cosmetic outcome compared with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 0 to 17 years old presenting to the emergency department with simple, linear facial lacerations requiring repair with sutures were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned to repair with either 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips or 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone. Families were contacted by phone at 2 weeks to discuss complications. At 2 months, participants were sent a secure link to upload photos of the scar electronically. The scars were then evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by a blinded Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physician and Pediatric Plastic Surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were enrolled, and 81 photos were received. The VAS scores for the fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips group were similar to the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group (53.9 vs. 54.5 mm, P=0.87). The Lin Correlation Coefficient was 0.74, indicating strong agreement between the raters. There was no significant difference in time to completion or ease of repair. There was only one complication due to infection in the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group, and one reported partial wound dehiscence in the same group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using adhesive strips overlying fast-absorbing gut sutures leads to a similar cosmetic outcome as using fast-absorbing gut sutures alone for simple facial laceration repair. While this technique did not show improved cosmesis or increased complications, it could be considered in select patients or may not be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:设计一项随机对照试验,比较两种修复小儿单纯性面部撕裂伤的方法。我们假设,与单独使用5-0快速吸收肠缝线修复的伤口相比,使用5-0快速吸收肠缝线和上覆胶条修复的伤口在美容效果方面优于5-0快速吸收肠缝线。方法:0 ~ 17岁的单纯面部线状撕裂伤需要缝合修复的急诊科患者符合入选条件。患者被随机分配使用5-0快速吸收肠缝线和上覆胶条或单独使用5-0快速吸收肠缝线进行修复。2周时通过电话联系家属讨论并发症。在2个月时,参与者被发送一个安全链接,以电子方式上传疤痕的照片。然后由一名盲法儿科急诊医师和儿科整形外科医生使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疤痕进行评估。结果:共入组患者120例,收到照片81张。快速吸收肠缝线上覆胶条组VAS评分与单独快速吸收肠缝线组相近(53.9 vs 54.5 mm, P=0.87)。林氏相关系数为0.74,表明评分者之间的一致性较强。完成时间和修复难易程度无显著差异。在单独使用快速吸收肠缝线的组中,只有一例因感染引起的并发症,而在同一组中,有一例报告了部分伤口裂开。结论:在快速吸收型肠缝合线上使用粘接剂条与单独使用快速吸收型肠缝合线进行单纯面部撕裂伤修复的美容效果相似。虽然这项技术没有改善美容效果或增加并发症,但可以考虑在选定的患者中使用,或者可能没有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair Using 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Sutures With and Without Overlying Adhesive Strips: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare 2 methods of repairing simple pediatric facial lacerations. We hypothesized that wounds repaired with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures and overlying adhesive strips would be superior with regard to cosmetic outcome compared with 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone.

Methods: Patients 0 to 17 years old presenting to the emergency department with simple, linear facial lacerations requiring repair with sutures were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned to repair with either 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips or 5-0 fast-absorbing gut sutures alone. Families were contacted by phone at 2 weeks to discuss complications. At 2 months, participants were sent a secure link to upload photos of the scar electronically. The scars were then evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) by a blinded Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physician and Pediatric Plastic Surgeon.

Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled, and 81 photos were received. The VAS scores for the fast-absorbing gut sutures with overlying adhesive strips group were similar to the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group (53.9 vs. 54.5 mm, P=0.87). The Lin Correlation Coefficient was 0.74, indicating strong agreement between the raters. There was no significant difference in time to completion or ease of repair. There was only one complication due to infection in the fast-absorbing gut sutures alone group, and one reported partial wound dehiscence in the same group.

Conclusions: Using adhesive strips overlying fast-absorbing gut sutures leads to a similar cosmetic outcome as using fast-absorbing gut sutures alone for simple facial laceration repair. While this technique did not show improved cosmesis or increased complications, it could be considered in select patients or may not be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信