[以人群为基础的疾病相关医疗需求分类系统的合并疾病组定义:PopGroup]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1055/a-2541-9695
Chrissa Tsatsaronis, Maria Klemt, Karen Kinder, Benedikt Langenberger, Anna Braun, Thomas G Grobe, Reinhard Busse, Wilm Quentin
{"title":"[以人群为基础的疾病相关医疗需求分类系统的合并疾病组定义:PopGroup]。","authors":"Chrissa Tsatsaronis, Maria Klemt, Karen Kinder, Benedikt Langenberger, Anna Braun, Thomas G Grobe, Reinhard Busse, Wilm Quentin","doi":"10.1055/a-2541-9695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years there has been an increased demand for a morbidity-oriented approach in the planning of healthcare facilities in Germany. Population-based classification systems, which already exist in various countries, are crucial for assessing regional healthcare needs. The PopGroup project aims to develop such a classification system (PopGrouper) for the German healthcare system and to test various applications. The PopGrouper assigns each individual to exactly one PopGroup based on clinical characteristics and healthcare needs. The initial phase of the PopGrouper development focused on grouping diagnoses into medically meaningful Consolidated Disease Groups (CDGs) to serve as the foundation for forming PopGroups. This article describes the formation and validation of CDGs, as well as the definition of a disease severity level to hierarchically rank the CDGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CDGs were formed using both medical expertise and analyses of claims data from the BARMER sickness fund. Pre-existing diagnosis groups (DxGs) defined for the German morbidity-based risk structure compensation scheme were used as the starting point. Initially, overarching Major Disease Categories (MDCs) were formed. Within MDCs, DxGs were grouped into CDGs based on predefined criteria. CDGs were validated by experts from scientific medical societies. Finally, a composite disease severity score was calculated based on three dimensions (mortality, costs, utilization) and severity levels from \"very severe\" to \"very minor\" were defined to classify CDGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 MDCs and 433 CDGs were defined and validated. Each CDG received a severity score. Based on this foundation, in the subsequent project phase, PopGroups were formed that took into consideration various diseases and combinations of diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDGs and MDCs represent important initial steps in the PopGrouper development. The aggregation of diagnoses into a smaller number of medically meaningful groups also offers opportunities beyond the project, for instance for healthcare research, for the analysis of diseases, and for the identification of patient groups with similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":"87 4","pages":"282-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Definition of consolidated disease groups for a population-based system to classify morbidity-related healthcare needs: PopGroup].\",\"authors\":\"Chrissa Tsatsaronis, Maria Klemt, Karen Kinder, Benedikt Langenberger, Anna Braun, Thomas G Grobe, Reinhard Busse, Wilm Quentin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2541-9695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years there has been an increased demand for a morbidity-oriented approach in the planning of healthcare facilities in Germany. Population-based classification systems, which already exist in various countries, are crucial for assessing regional healthcare needs. The PopGroup project aims to develop such a classification system (PopGrouper) for the German healthcare system and to test various applications. The PopGrouper assigns each individual to exactly one PopGroup based on clinical characteristics and healthcare needs. The initial phase of the PopGrouper development focused on grouping diagnoses into medically meaningful Consolidated Disease Groups (CDGs) to serve as the foundation for forming PopGroups. This article describes the formation and validation of CDGs, as well as the definition of a disease severity level to hierarchically rank the CDGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CDGs were formed using both medical expertise and analyses of claims data from the BARMER sickness fund. Pre-existing diagnosis groups (DxGs) defined for the German morbidity-based risk structure compensation scheme were used as the starting point. Initially, overarching Major Disease Categories (MDCs) were formed. Within MDCs, DxGs were grouped into CDGs based on predefined criteria. CDGs were validated by experts from scientific medical societies. Finally, a composite disease severity score was calculated based on three dimensions (mortality, costs, utilization) and severity levels from \\\"very severe\\\" to \\\"very minor\\\" were defined to classify CDGs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 MDCs and 433 CDGs were defined and validated. Each CDG received a severity score. Based on this foundation, in the subsequent project phase, PopGroups were formed that took into consideration various diseases and combinations of diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDGs and MDCs represent important initial steps in the PopGrouper development. The aggregation of diagnoses into a smaller number of medically meaningful groups also offers opportunities beyond the project, for instance for healthcare research, for the analysis of diseases, and for the identification of patient groups with similar characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"282-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2541-9695\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2541-9695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,在德国的卫生保健设施规划中,对以发病率为导向的方法的需求不断增加。基于人口的分类系统在许多国家已经存在,对于评估区域卫生保健需求至关重要。PopGroup项目旨在为德国医疗保健系统开发这样一个分类系统(PopGrouper),并测试各种应用程序。PopGrouper根据临床特征和医疗保健需求将每个人分配到一个PopGroup。PopGrouper开发的初始阶段侧重于将诊断分组为具有医学意义的综合疾病组(cdg),作为形成PopGroups的基础。本文介绍了cdg的形成和验证,以及疾病严重程度的定义,对cdg进行分级。方法:利用医学专业知识和分析BARMER疾病基金的索赔数据形成CDGs。为德国基于发病率的风险结构补偿方案定义的预先存在诊断组(dxg)被用作起点。最初,形成了总体主要疾病类别(MDCs)。在MDCs中,dxg根据预定义的标准被分组到cdg中。CDGs由科学医学协会的专家验证。最后,基于三个维度(死亡率、成本、利用率)计算疾病严重程度的综合评分,并定义从“非常严重”到“非常轻微”的严重程度,对cdg进行分类。结果:共定义和验证了32个MDCs和433个CDGs。每个CDG都有一个严重程度评分。在此基础上,在随后的项目阶段,形成了考虑各种疾病和疾病组合的PopGroups。结论:cdg和MDCs是PopGrouper开发的重要初始步骤。将诊断集中到少数医学上有意义的群体中也提供了项目之外的机会,例如用于医疗保健研究、疾病分析和识别具有相似特征的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Definition of consolidated disease groups for a population-based system to classify morbidity-related healthcare needs: PopGroup].

Objective: In recent years there has been an increased demand for a morbidity-oriented approach in the planning of healthcare facilities in Germany. Population-based classification systems, which already exist in various countries, are crucial for assessing regional healthcare needs. The PopGroup project aims to develop such a classification system (PopGrouper) for the German healthcare system and to test various applications. The PopGrouper assigns each individual to exactly one PopGroup based on clinical characteristics and healthcare needs. The initial phase of the PopGrouper development focused on grouping diagnoses into medically meaningful Consolidated Disease Groups (CDGs) to serve as the foundation for forming PopGroups. This article describes the formation and validation of CDGs, as well as the definition of a disease severity level to hierarchically rank the CDGs.

Methods: CDGs were formed using both medical expertise and analyses of claims data from the BARMER sickness fund. Pre-existing diagnosis groups (DxGs) defined for the German morbidity-based risk structure compensation scheme were used as the starting point. Initially, overarching Major Disease Categories (MDCs) were formed. Within MDCs, DxGs were grouped into CDGs based on predefined criteria. CDGs were validated by experts from scientific medical societies. Finally, a composite disease severity score was calculated based on three dimensions (mortality, costs, utilization) and severity levels from "very severe" to "very minor" were defined to classify CDGs.

Results: A total of 32 MDCs and 433 CDGs were defined and validated. Each CDG received a severity score. Based on this foundation, in the subsequent project phase, PopGroups were formed that took into consideration various diseases and combinations of diseases.

Conclusion: CDGs and MDCs represent important initial steps in the PopGrouper development. The aggregation of diagnoses into a smaller number of medically meaningful groups also offers opportunities beyond the project, for instance for healthcare research, for the analysis of diseases, and for the identification of patient groups with similar characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信