医院设计对护理任务时间的影响:一项时间运动研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tim Korteland, Chiao-Yun Li, Niklas Dohmen, Bastiaan H A Urbanus, Sebastiaan Van Zelst, Lihui Pu, Monique Van Dijk, Erwin Ista
{"title":"医院设计对护理任务时间的影响:一项时间运动研究。","authors":"Tim Korteland, Chiao-Yun Li, Niklas Dohmen, Bastiaan H A Urbanus, Sebastiaan Van Zelst, Lihui Pu, Monique Van Dijk, Erwin Ista","doi":"10.1177/19375867251330838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo explore the time spent on nursing tasks and the extent of multitasking in a hospital with multi-bedded rooms compared to single-occupancy rooms.BackgroundSingle-occupancy patient rooms in hospitals have become popular because of the privacy they offer. However, little is known about the impact of different hospital designs on time spent performing on nursing tasks.MethodsA before-after time motion study was conducted in a former hospital which featured multi-bedded rooms and a new hospital with 100% single-occupancy rooms. Trained observers shadowed nurses during day and evening shifts using an online shadow application distinguishing eleven main categories of nursing tasks (e.g., direct patient care, indirect care, and professional communication). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Tasks performed concurrently (multitasking) are described in terms of (overlapping) duration and frequency.ResultsIn total, 60 and 107 nurses were shadowed for 225 and 450 hours in the former and new hospital, respectively. The top three tasks on which nurses spent most the time in the former and new hospital concerned: direct care 40% versus 40%, training and supervision 27% versus 25%, communication 25% versus 25%, respectively. In the former hospital, nurses performed on average 32.8% of their time on multitasking versus 34.8% in the new hospital.ConclusionsContrary to our expectations, the 100% single-occupancy rooms hospital design hardly affected nursing time spent in nursing tasks and multi-tasking compared to a multi-bedded patient rooms setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867251330838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Hospital Design on Time Spent on Nursing Tasks: A Time Motion Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Korteland, Chiao-Yun Li, Niklas Dohmen, Bastiaan H A Urbanus, Sebastiaan Van Zelst, Lihui Pu, Monique Van Dijk, Erwin Ista\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867251330838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesTo explore the time spent on nursing tasks and the extent of multitasking in a hospital with multi-bedded rooms compared to single-occupancy rooms.BackgroundSingle-occupancy patient rooms in hospitals have become popular because of the privacy they offer. However, little is known about the impact of different hospital designs on time spent performing on nursing tasks.MethodsA before-after time motion study was conducted in a former hospital which featured multi-bedded rooms and a new hospital with 100% single-occupancy rooms. Trained observers shadowed nurses during day and evening shifts using an online shadow application distinguishing eleven main categories of nursing tasks (e.g., direct patient care, indirect care, and professional communication). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Tasks performed concurrently (multitasking) are described in terms of (overlapping) duration and frequency.ResultsIn total, 60 and 107 nurses were shadowed for 225 and 450 hours in the former and new hospital, respectively. The top three tasks on which nurses spent most the time in the former and new hospital concerned: direct care 40% versus 40%, training and supervision 27% versus 25%, communication 25% versus 25%, respectively. In the former hospital, nurses performed on average 32.8% of their time on multitasking versus 34.8% in the new hospital.ConclusionsContrary to our expectations, the 100% single-occupancy rooms hospital design hardly affected nursing time spent in nursing tasks and multi-tasking compared to a multi-bedded patient rooms setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19375867251330838\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251330838\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251330838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨多床病房与单床病房在护理任务上花费的时间及多任务处理的程度。医院的单人病房因其提供的隐私性而变得流行。然而,人们对不同医院设计对护理工作时间的影响知之甚少。方法在原医院多床位病房和新医院100%单人病房进行前后时间运动研究。训练有素的观察员在白班和晚班期间使用在线影子应用程序跟踪护士,区分11种主要护理任务(例如,直接护理患者、间接护理和专业沟通)。数据分析采用描述性统计。同时执行的任务(多任务)是根据(重叠)持续时间和频率来描述的。结果分别有60名护士和107名护士在原医院和新医院接受了225小时和450小时的实习。护士在原医院和新医院花费最多时间的前三项工作分别是:直接护理(40%对40%)、培训和监督(27%对25%)、沟通(25%对25%)。在原医院,护士平均32.8%的时间用于多任务处理,而在新医院,这一比例为34.8%。与我们的预期相反,与多床位病房设置相比,100%单人病房的医院设计几乎没有影响护理任务和多任务的护理时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Hospital Design on Time Spent on Nursing Tasks: A Time Motion Study.

ObjectivesTo explore the time spent on nursing tasks and the extent of multitasking in a hospital with multi-bedded rooms compared to single-occupancy rooms.BackgroundSingle-occupancy patient rooms in hospitals have become popular because of the privacy they offer. However, little is known about the impact of different hospital designs on time spent performing on nursing tasks.MethodsA before-after time motion study was conducted in a former hospital which featured multi-bedded rooms and a new hospital with 100% single-occupancy rooms. Trained observers shadowed nurses during day and evening shifts using an online shadow application distinguishing eleven main categories of nursing tasks (e.g., direct patient care, indirect care, and professional communication). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Tasks performed concurrently (multitasking) are described in terms of (overlapping) duration and frequency.ResultsIn total, 60 and 107 nurses were shadowed for 225 and 450 hours in the former and new hospital, respectively. The top three tasks on which nurses spent most the time in the former and new hospital concerned: direct care 40% versus 40%, training and supervision 27% versus 25%, communication 25% versus 25%, respectively. In the former hospital, nurses performed on average 32.8% of their time on multitasking versus 34.8% in the new hospital.ConclusionsContrary to our expectations, the 100% single-occupancy rooms hospital design hardly affected nursing time spent in nursing tasks and multi-tasking compared to a multi-bedded patient rooms setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信