Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini
{"title":"关于用sacituzumab govitecan治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者不良事件管理的Delphi共识。","authors":"Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan.
Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.
Methods: This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.
Results: In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.
Conclusions: The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.