关于用sacituzumab govitecan治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者不良事件管理的Delphi共识。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088
Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini
{"title":"关于用sacituzumab govitecan治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者不良事件管理的Delphi共识。","authors":"Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Amela Valsecchi, Simona Pisegna, Andrea Antonuzzo, Grazia Arpino, Giampaolo Bianchini, Laura Biganzoli, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Carmen Criscitiello, Romano Danesi, Alessandra Fabi, Raffaele Giusti, Loredana Pau, Massimo Di Maio, Daniele Santini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:转移性三阴性乳腺癌(BC;mTNBC是最具侵袭性的癌症之一,由于缺乏激素靶受体而难以治疗。Sacituzumab govitecan (SG)是一种新的治疗方法,利用针对实体上皮肿瘤中表达的Trop-2抗原的抗体和活性代谢物SN-38的组合,精确靶向癌细胞。达成共识的建议需要综合专家意见,特别是在直接证据有限的情况下。方法:本研究旨在建立一个德尔菲过程,以收集一组BC和支持性专家在临床实践中使用SG的观点。一个科学委员会讨论并定义了一系列声明,这些声明通过两轮投票提交给专家组。该过程旨在收集专家意见,以就SG的安全性、给药方案和患者管理等关键点达成共识。每一轮调查都包括根据当前文献提出的有针对性的问题。一致性的预定义标准设定为≥75%的一致性。结果:2024年10月,通过对40份声明进行投票,收集29名专家意见,达成67%的共识。UGT1A1 *28/*28基因型患者SG初始剂量的降低和预防管理是讨论最多的话题。结论:研究结果为临床决策提供了基础框架,并突出了专家协作综合在制定实践指南中的重要性。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性的SG试验,以解决已确定的不确定性领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan.

Background: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.

Methods: This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.

Results: In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.

Conclusions: The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信