elranatumab治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的经济影响。

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S501404
Bhavesh Shah, Rickard Sandin, Yun Liu, Laura R Bobolts, Yannan Hu, Isha Mol, Alexander Schepart, David M Hughes, Jim Hart, Patrick Hlavacek
{"title":"elranatumab治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的经济影响。","authors":"Bhavesh Shah, Rickard Sandin, Yun Liu, Laura R Bobolts, Yannan Hu, Isha Mol, Alexander Schepart, David M Hughes, Jim Hart, Patrick Hlavacek","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S501404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the budget impact of adding elranatamab to the US formulary to treat adults with RRMM who have received ≥4 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and to assess the total cost of care and cost per month of progression-free survival (PFS) between elranatamab and available treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of elranatamab in a one-million-member US commercial and Medicare health plan. Epidemiology data was obtained from the SEER database and a large US real-world study. Key clinical inputs included treatment duration, PFS, overall survival, and adverse events (AEs). Costs associated with drug acquisition monitoring, medical resource use (specifically hospitalization and physician visits), and AEs were incorporated. Model inputs were sourced from clinical trial data, US government databases, and published literature. Total budget impact and per member per month (PMPM) were assessed. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were conducted to assess model input uncertainty. Total cost of care and cost per month of PFS were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 14 (commercial) and 60 (Medicare) RRMM patients per year would be eligible for treatment. Adding elranatamab resulted in a total budget impact of $553,607 ($0.05 PMPM) in commercial and $2,351,515 ($0.20 PMPM) in Medicare over three years. OWSA indicated results were most sensitive for elranatamab drug costs and relative dose intensity. Total cost of care per month of median PFS over one year was $19,642 with elranatamab, talquetamab ($33,391), teclistamab ($37,791), selinexor plus dexamethasone ($48,784), physician's choice of treatment ($65,886), idecabtagene vicleucel ($78,361), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel ($17,640).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elranatamab for RRMM is projected to result in a minimal to small budget impact over 3 years and good economic value with lower cost of care per month of PFS compared with other available RRMM treatments except for ciltacabtagene autoleucel.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"289-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Impact of Elranatamab for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Bhavesh Shah, Rickard Sandin, Yun Liu, Laura R Bobolts, Yannan Hu, Isha Mol, Alexander Schepart, David M Hughes, Jim Hart, Patrick Hlavacek\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S501404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate the budget impact of adding elranatamab to the US formulary to treat adults with RRMM who have received ≥4 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and to assess the total cost of care and cost per month of progression-free survival (PFS) between elranatamab and available treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of elranatamab in a one-million-member US commercial and Medicare health plan. Epidemiology data was obtained from the SEER database and a large US real-world study. Key clinical inputs included treatment duration, PFS, overall survival, and adverse events (AEs). Costs associated with drug acquisition monitoring, medical resource use (specifically hospitalization and physician visits), and AEs were incorporated. Model inputs were sourced from clinical trial data, US government databases, and published literature. Total budget impact and per member per month (PMPM) were assessed. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were conducted to assess model input uncertainty. Total cost of care and cost per month of PFS were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 14 (commercial) and 60 (Medicare) RRMM patients per year would be eligible for treatment. Adding elranatamab resulted in a total budget impact of $553,607 ($0.05 PMPM) in commercial and $2,351,515 ($0.20 PMPM) in Medicare over three years. OWSA indicated results were most sensitive for elranatamab drug costs and relative dose intensity. Total cost of care per month of median PFS over one year was $19,642 with elranatamab, talquetamab ($33,391), teclistamab ($37,791), selinexor plus dexamethasone ($48,784), physician's choice of treatment ($65,886), idecabtagene vicleucel ($78,361), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel ($17,640).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elranatamab for RRMM is projected to result in a minimal to small budget impact over 3 years and good economic value with lower cost of care per month of PFS compared with other available RRMM treatments except for ciltacabtagene autoleucel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"289-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S501404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S501404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估将elranatamab添加到美国处方中治疗先前接受过≥4条治疗线(包括蛋白酶体抑制剂,免疫调节药物和抗cd38单克隆抗体)的成人RRMM的预算影响,并评估elranatamab和可用治疗之间的总护理成本和每月无进展生存期(PFS)成本。方法:开发了一个经济模型来评估elranatamab在一百万成员的美国商业和医疗保险健康计划中的预算影响。流行病学数据来自SEER数据库和美国一项大型真实世界研究。关键的临床输入包括治疗时间、PFS、总生存期和不良事件(ae)。纳入了与药品获取监测、医疗资源使用(特别是住院和医生就诊)和不良事件相关的成本。模型输入来源于临床试验数据、美国政府数据库和已发表的文献。评估了预算影响总额和每个成员每月(PMPM)。采用单向敏感性分析(OWSA)评估模型输入的不确定性。还评估了PFS的总护理费用和每月费用。结果:估计每年有14名(商业)和60名(医疗保险)RRMM患者符合治疗条件。添加elranatamab导致三年的商业预算影响为553,607美元(0.05 PMPM),医疗保险预算影响为2,351,515美元(0.20 PMPM)。OWSA显示结果对elranatamab药物成本和相对剂量强度最为敏感。在一年中,平均PFS每月的护理费用为19,642美元,其中elranatamab, talquetamab(33,391美元),teclistamab(37,791美元),selinexor加地塞米松(48,784美元),医生选择的治疗(65,886美元),idecabtagene vicleucel(78,361美元)和ciltacabtagene autoleucel(17,640美元)。结论:Elranatamab治疗RRMM预计在3年内对预算的影响很小,与除ciltacabtagene外的其他可用RRMM治疗相比,PFS的每月护理费用较低,经济价值良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Impact of Elranatamab for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Purpose: To estimate the budget impact of adding elranatamab to the US formulary to treat adults with RRMM who have received ≥4 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, and to assess the total cost of care and cost per month of progression-free survival (PFS) between elranatamab and available treatments.

Methods: An economic model was developed to assess the budget impact of elranatamab in a one-million-member US commercial and Medicare health plan. Epidemiology data was obtained from the SEER database and a large US real-world study. Key clinical inputs included treatment duration, PFS, overall survival, and adverse events (AEs). Costs associated with drug acquisition monitoring, medical resource use (specifically hospitalization and physician visits), and AEs were incorporated. Model inputs were sourced from clinical trial data, US government databases, and published literature. Total budget impact and per member per month (PMPM) were assessed. One-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were conducted to assess model input uncertainty. Total cost of care and cost per month of PFS were also assessed.

Results: An estimated 14 (commercial) and 60 (Medicare) RRMM patients per year would be eligible for treatment. Adding elranatamab resulted in a total budget impact of $553,607 ($0.05 PMPM) in commercial and $2,351,515 ($0.20 PMPM) in Medicare over three years. OWSA indicated results were most sensitive for elranatamab drug costs and relative dose intensity. Total cost of care per month of median PFS over one year was $19,642 with elranatamab, talquetamab ($33,391), teclistamab ($37,791), selinexor plus dexamethasone ($48,784), physician's choice of treatment ($65,886), idecabtagene vicleucel ($78,361), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel ($17,640).

Conclusion: Elranatamab for RRMM is projected to result in a minimal to small budget impact over 3 years and good economic value with lower cost of care per month of PFS compared with other available RRMM treatments except for ciltacabtagene autoleucel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信