Krithika Anil, Adam Bird, Kate Bridgman, Shane Erickson, Jenny Freeman, Carol McKinstry, Christie Robinson, Sally Abey
{"title":"联合医疗专业人员的远程医疗培训和教育:范围审查。","authors":"Krithika Anil, Adam Bird, Kate Bridgman, Shane Erickson, Jenny Freeman, Carol McKinstry, Christie Robinson, Sally Abey","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2024.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing adoption of telehealth in allied health disciplines, establishing clear training and education standards is crucial. This review aims to map the current training and education that has been delivered to support development of telehealth competencies in allied health professionals. This scoping review extends our previous review with an updated search.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Population Concept Context framework was used, and the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, United Kingdom Health Forum, WHO, Health Education England, and all U.K. and Australian Allied Health Profession (AHP) professional bodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,05,980 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Training and education differed greatly, with no definite pattern in teaching approaches. Three articles used standardized questionnaires for training and education assessment, while the remaining articles used author-designed assessments. Eight articles reported that participants achieved the targeted telehealth competencies, and five reported improved attitudes toward telehealth following training and education. Articles recommended various factors that may improve telehealth training and education outcomes, which included a combination of online and face-to-face methods, interprofessional training, consolidation of their skills through supervised clinical work, and separating video and telehealth competencies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review represents the first comprehensive exploration of telehealth training and education across allied health disciplines. While articles yielded generally positive outcomes, the absence of standardized methods prompts questions about its efficacy. Research should focus on developing evidence-based curriculums informed by pedagogic practices tailored to allied health needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"76-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth Training and Education for Allied Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Krithika Anil, Adam Bird, Kate Bridgman, Shane Erickson, Jenny Freeman, Carol McKinstry, Christie Robinson, Sally Abey\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmr.2024.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the growing adoption of telehealth in allied health disciplines, establishing clear training and education standards is crucial. This review aims to map the current training and education that has been delivered to support development of telehealth competencies in allied health professionals. This scoping review extends our previous review with an updated search.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Population Concept Context framework was used, and the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, United Kingdom Health Forum, WHO, Health Education England, and all U.K. and Australian Allied Health Profession (AHP) professional bodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,05,980 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Training and education differed greatly, with no definite pattern in teaching approaches. Three articles used standardized questionnaires for training and education assessment, while the remaining articles used author-designed assessments. Eight articles reported that participants achieved the targeted telehealth competencies, and five reported improved attitudes toward telehealth following training and education. Articles recommended various factors that may improve telehealth training and education outcomes, which included a combination of online and face-to-face methods, interprofessional training, consolidation of their skills through supervised clinical work, and separating video and telehealth competencies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review represents the first comprehensive exploration of telehealth training and education across allied health disciplines. While articles yielded generally positive outcomes, the absence of standardized methods prompts questions about its efficacy. Research should focus on developing evidence-based curriculums informed by pedagogic practices tailored to allied health needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"76-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2024.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:随着联合医疗学科越来越多地采用远程医疗,建立明确的培训和教育标准至关重要。这一审查的目的是绘制当前的培训和教育,以支持联合卫生专业人员远程保健能力的发展。这个范围审查扩展了我们之前的审查,更新了搜索。方法:采用人口概念上下文框架,检索以下数据库:MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsychInfo、Cochrane、EMBASE、Web of Science、PEDro、英国健康论坛、世卫组织、英国健康教育以及所有英国和澳大利亚联合健康专业(AHP)专业机构。结果:105,980篇文献中,12篇符合纳入标准。培训和教育差异很大,教学方法没有明确的模式。三篇文章使用标准化问卷进行培训和教育评估,其余文章使用作者设计的评估。8篇文章报告说,参与者达到了目标远程保健能力,5篇文章报告说,经过培训和教育,对远程保健的态度有所改善。文章推荐了可能改善远程保健培训和教育成果的各种因素,其中包括在线和面对面方法的结合、跨专业培训、通过有监督的临床工作巩固他们的技能,以及将视频和远程保健能力分开。讨论:这一范围审查代表了跨联合卫生学科远程医疗培训和教育的第一次全面探索。虽然文章总体上产生了积极的结果,但缺乏标准化的方法引发了对其有效性的质疑。研究应侧重于开发以证据为基础的课程,并借鉴适合相关卫生需求的教学实践。
Telehealth Training and Education for Allied Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.
Background: With the growing adoption of telehealth in allied health disciplines, establishing clear training and education standards is crucial. This review aims to map the current training and education that has been delivered to support development of telehealth competencies in allied health professionals. This scoping review extends our previous review with an updated search.
Methods: The Population Concept Context framework was used, and the following databases were searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, United Kingdom Health Forum, WHO, Health Education England, and all U.K. and Australian Allied Health Profession (AHP) professional bodies.
Results: Out of 1,05,980 articles, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Training and education differed greatly, with no definite pattern in teaching approaches. Three articles used standardized questionnaires for training and education assessment, while the remaining articles used author-designed assessments. Eight articles reported that participants achieved the targeted telehealth competencies, and five reported improved attitudes toward telehealth following training and education. Articles recommended various factors that may improve telehealth training and education outcomes, which included a combination of online and face-to-face methods, interprofessional training, consolidation of their skills through supervised clinical work, and separating video and telehealth competencies.
Discussion: This scoping review represents the first comprehensive exploration of telehealth training and education across allied health disciplines. While articles yielded generally positive outcomes, the absence of standardized methods prompts questions about its efficacy. Research should focus on developing evidence-based curriculums informed by pedagogic practices tailored to allied health needs.