血管内取栓成功后基于梗死体积的血压管理。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Haram Joo, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Il Hyung Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam
{"title":"血管内取栓成功后基于梗死体积的血压管理。","authors":"Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Haram Joo, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Il Hyung Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam","doi":"10.1177/23969873251335204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in large core infarcts has been established, the influence of blood pressure (BP) management on functional outcomes based on infarct volume remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, which compared intensive (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) versus conventional (systolic BP 140-180 mmHg) BP management within the first 24 h following successful recanalization. Patients were grouped based on an infarct volume cut-off of 50 ml, assessed 24 h post-EVT. The primary efficacy outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2) at 3 months. Change of predicted probability for functional independence between BP managements, as infarct volume varied, was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 300 patients, 222 (74.0%) were in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group and 78 (26.0%) were in the infarct volume >50 ml group. The conventional management was significantly associated with a higher rate of functional independence in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.12-3.86]). In the infarct volume >50 ml group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between BP managements (AOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.46-5.04]). The interaction effect between the infarct volume groups and BP managements was not significant. As infarct volume increased, the difference in predicted probability of functional independence between BP managements decreased.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Conventional BP management showed greater benefits for achieving functional independence at 3 months when infarct volumes were smaller. As infarct volume increased, the impact of BP management strategies on functional outcomes decreased.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305).</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873251335204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure management based on infarct volume after successful endovascular thrombectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Haram Joo, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Il Hyung Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969873251335204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in large core infarcts has been established, the influence of blood pressure (BP) management on functional outcomes based on infarct volume remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, which compared intensive (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) versus conventional (systolic BP 140-180 mmHg) BP management within the first 24 h following successful recanalization. Patients were grouped based on an infarct volume cut-off of 50 ml, assessed 24 h post-EVT. The primary efficacy outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2) at 3 months. Change of predicted probability for functional independence between BP managements, as infarct volume varied, was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 300 patients, 222 (74.0%) were in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group and 78 (26.0%) were in the infarct volume >50 ml group. The conventional management was significantly associated with a higher rate of functional independence in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.12-3.86]). In the infarct volume >50 ml group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between BP managements (AOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.46-5.04]). The interaction effect between the infarct volume groups and BP managements was not significant. As infarct volume increased, the difference in predicted probability of functional independence between BP managements decreased.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Conventional BP management showed greater benefits for achieving functional independence at 3 months when infarct volumes were smaller. As infarct volume increased, the impact of BP management strategies on functional outcomes decreased.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23969873251335204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251335204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873251335204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:虽然血管内取栓术(EVT)治疗大面积核心梗死的疗效已得到证实,但基于梗死面积的血压(BP)管理对功能结局的影响仍不清楚。患者和方法:我们对动脉内取栓治疗患者的预后进行了二次分析-最佳血压控制(OPTIMAL-BP)试验,比较了强化(收缩压)结果:在300例患者中,222例(74.0%)属于梗死体积≥50 ml组,78例(26.0%)属于梗死体积≥50 ml组。在梗死体积≥50 ml组,常规治疗与较高的功能独立性显著相关(调整优势比[AOR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.12-3.86])。在梗死容量bbb50 ml组中,功能独立患者的比例在BP管理之间无显著差异(AOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.46-5.04])。梗死体积组和血压管理之间的相互作用不显著。随着梗死面积的增加,两种血压管理方法预测功能独立概率的差异减小。讨论和结论:常规血压管理在梗死面积较小的3个月时实现功能独立有更大的益处。随着梗死面积的增加,血压管理策略对功能结局的影响降低。注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood pressure management based on infarct volume after successful endovascular thrombectomy.

Introduction: While the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in large core infarcts has been established, the influence of blood pressure (BP) management on functional outcomes based on infarct volume remains unclear.

Patients and methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, which compared intensive (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) versus conventional (systolic BP 140-180 mmHg) BP management within the first 24 h following successful recanalization. Patients were grouped based on an infarct volume cut-off of 50 ml, assessed 24 h post-EVT. The primary efficacy outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2) at 3 months. Change of predicted probability for functional independence between BP managements, as infarct volume varied, was assessed.

Results: Of the 300 patients, 222 (74.0%) were in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group and 78 (26.0%) were in the infarct volume >50 ml group. The conventional management was significantly associated with a higher rate of functional independence in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.12-3.86]). In the infarct volume >50 ml group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between BP managements (AOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.46-5.04]). The interaction effect between the infarct volume groups and BP managements was not significant. As infarct volume increased, the difference in predicted probability of functional independence between BP managements decreased.

Discussion and conclusions: Conventional BP management showed greater benefits for achieving functional independence at 3 months when infarct volumes were smaller. As infarct volume increased, the impact of BP management strategies on functional outcomes decreased.

Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信