评估根治性前列腺切除术后的术后做法和出院建议。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Melissa Assel, Maria Pere, Sunny Nalavenkata, Karim A Touijer, Vincent P Laudone, Daniel W Lin, Juan Gomez Rivas, Anders Bjartell, Sigrid V Carlsson
{"title":"评估根治性前列腺切除术后的术后做法和出院建议。","authors":"Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Melissa Assel, Maria Pere, Sunny Nalavenkata, Karim A Touijer, Vincent P Laudone, Daniel W Lin, Juan Gomez Rivas, Anders Bjartell, Sigrid V Carlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Consistent, accurate postoperative guidance is crucial for early recovery and patient satisfaction in urology, especially for radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. However, patients often receive inconsistent information, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based postoperative care guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review and evaluation of current postoperative practices for RP. This involved (1) reviewing existing discharge information at Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to identify areas of improvement; (2) systematically evaluating inconsistencies in discharge instructions and their impact on patient care; (3) distributing an anonymous survey to urologists in the US and Europe via REDCap to gather insights into global postoperative care practices. The survey included questions on various aspects of postoperative care, such as catheter use, medication regimens, dietary restrictions, and physical activity guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 247 survey responses. Despite some consensus on certain postoperative practices and recommendations, significant variability existed, underscoring the lack of standardized guidelines. Notable differences were observed between US and European cohorts, particularly in postoperative length of stay and discharge practices. Only 1.4% of US responders discharged patients 3 or more days postsurgery compared to 46% in Europe. Variability was also noted in recommendations for erectile function medications and postoperative activity restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significant variability in postoperative care recommendations for RP and the urgent need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Implementing such guidelines will enhance patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes, improving postoperative care across various surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of postoperative practices and discharge recommendations after radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara Vieira Lima Aguiar Melão, Melissa Assel, Maria Pere, Sunny Nalavenkata, Karim A Touijer, Vincent P Laudone, Daniel W Lin, Juan Gomez Rivas, Anders Bjartell, Sigrid V Carlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Consistent, accurate postoperative guidance is crucial for early recovery and patient satisfaction in urology, especially for radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. However, patients often receive inconsistent information, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based postoperative care guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive review and evaluation of current postoperative practices for RP. This involved (1) reviewing existing discharge information at Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to identify areas of improvement; (2) systematically evaluating inconsistencies in discharge instructions and their impact on patient care; (3) distributing an anonymous survey to urologists in the US and Europe via REDCap to gather insights into global postoperative care practices. The survey included questions on various aspects of postoperative care, such as catheter use, medication regimens, dietary restrictions, and physical activity guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 247 survey responses. Despite some consensus on certain postoperative practices and recommendations, significant variability existed, underscoring the lack of standardized guidelines. Notable differences were observed between US and European cohorts, particularly in postoperative length of stay and discharge practices. Only 1.4% of US responders discharged patients 3 or more days postsurgery compared to 46% in Europe. Variability was also noted in recommendations for erectile function medications and postoperative activity restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the significant variability in postoperative care recommendations for RP and the urgent need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Implementing such guidelines will enhance patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes, improving postoperative care across various surgical procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一致、准确的术后指导对于泌尿外科,特别是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者的早期康复和患者满意度至关重要。然而,患者经常收到不一致的信息,强调需要标准化的、循证的术后护理指南。材料和方法:我们对RP的当前术后实践进行了全面的回顾和评估。这包括(1)回顾Josie Robertson手术中心,纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心现有的出院信息,以确定改进的领域;(2)系统评估出院指示的不一致性及其对患者护理的影响;(3)通过REDCap向美国和欧洲的泌尿科医生分发匿名调查,以收集对全球术后护理实践的见解。调查包括术后护理的各个方面的问题,如导管使用、药物治疗方案、饮食限制和体育活动指南。结果:共收到问卷回复247份。尽管在某些术后做法和建议上有一些共识,但存在显著的差异,强调缺乏标准化的指南。在美国和欧洲的队列中观察到显著的差异,特别是在术后住院时间和出院实践方面。只有1.4%的美国应答者术后3天或更长时间出院,而欧洲为46%。在勃起功能药物和术后活动限制的建议中也注意到可变性。结论:本研究强调了RP术后护理建议的显著差异,以及迫切需要标准化的循证指南。实施这些指南将提高患者的康复、满意度和总体结果,改善各种外科手术的术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of postoperative practices and discharge recommendations after radical prostatectomy.

Purpose: Consistent, accurate postoperative guidance is crucial for early recovery and patient satisfaction in urology, especially for radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. However, patients often receive inconsistent information, highlighting the need for standardized, evidence-based postoperative care guidelines.

Materials and methods: We conducted a comprehensive review and evaluation of current postoperative practices for RP. This involved (1) reviewing existing discharge information at Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to identify areas of improvement; (2) systematically evaluating inconsistencies in discharge instructions and their impact on patient care; (3) distributing an anonymous survey to urologists in the US and Europe via REDCap to gather insights into global postoperative care practices. The survey included questions on various aspects of postoperative care, such as catheter use, medication regimens, dietary restrictions, and physical activity guidelines.

Results: We received 247 survey responses. Despite some consensus on certain postoperative practices and recommendations, significant variability existed, underscoring the lack of standardized guidelines. Notable differences were observed between US and European cohorts, particularly in postoperative length of stay and discharge practices. Only 1.4% of US responders discharged patients 3 or more days postsurgery compared to 46% in Europe. Variability was also noted in recommendations for erectile function medications and postoperative activity restrictions.

Conclusion: This study underscores the significant variability in postoperative care recommendations for RP and the urgent need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Implementing such guidelines will enhance patient recovery, satisfaction, and overall outcomes, improving postoperative care across various surgical procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信