与腰椎微椎间盘切除术后复发性突出和翻修手术相关的患者因素。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-10-05 eCollection Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148
Ryan Hoang, Junho Song, Justin Tiao, Alex Ngan, Timothy Hoang, John J Corvi, Nikan K Namiri, Saad Chaudhary, Samuel K Cho, Andrew C Hecht, David Essig, Sohrab Virk, Austen D Katz
{"title":"与腰椎微椎间盘切除术后复发性突出和翻修手术相关的患者因素。","authors":"Ryan Hoang, Junho Song, Justin Tiao, Alex Ngan, Timothy Hoang, John J Corvi, Nikan K Namiri, Saad Chaudhary, Samuel K Cho, Andrew C Hecht, David Essig, Sohrab Virk, Austen D Katz","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy is a commonly conducted surgical procedure for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Recurrence of herniation is a common cause of poor outcomes and the need for revision surgery, which occurs in as many as 21% of patients following primary discectomy. Identifying factors that are associated with the recurrence of herniation may be valuable for risk stratification and patient counseling. This study aimed to explore the relationship between various patient demographic variables and comorbidities and rates of reoperation after primary lumbar microdiscectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who were undergoing single-level primary lumbar microdiscectomy between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Patient demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI), and various comorbidities were compared between cohorts. To determine factors independently associated with the need for revision microdiscectomy, multivariable Poisson regressions were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a total of 65,121 primary discectomy patients were included, with a separate cohort of 6,971 patients undergoing revision discectomy. In comparison with primary patients, the revision cohort was older and had higher proportions of female and non-Hispanic White patients (all <i>c</i>0.001). The odds ratio for revision discectomy was greater in patients aged ≥65 years (1.577, 95% CI [1.480, 1.680]) than in those aged <45 years (<i>p</i>>0.001). The odds ratio for revision was lower in Black (0.821, 95% CI [0.738, 0.914]) and Hispanic patients (0.819, 95% CI [0.738, 0.909]) when compared with non-Hispanic White patients (<i>p</i><0.001). Obese patients with BMI ≥35 (1.193, 95% CI [1.103, 1.290]) were at greater risk of revision than those with BMI <25 (<i>p</i><0.001). Diabetes (1.326, 95% CI [1.242, 1.416], <i>p</i><0.001), functional dependence (1.411, 95% CI [1.183, 1.683], <i>p</i><0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (1.315, 95% CI [1.137, 1.512], <i>p</i><0.001), hypertension (1.398, 95% CI [1.330, 1.470], <i>p</i><0.001), and smoking (1.082, 95% CI [1.018, 1.151], <i>p</i>=0.012) were associated with greater risk of revision. Poisson log-linear regression demonstrated sex (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=19.9, <i>p</i><0.001), race (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=39.5, <i>p</i><0.001), diabetes (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=10.1, <i>p</i>=0.001), smoking (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=18.5, <i>p</i><0.001), hypertension (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=16.4, <i>p</i><0.001), age (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=102.4, <i>p</i><0.001), and BMI (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=4.7, <i>p</i>=0.029) as significant predictors of revision, with steroid use (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=3.5, <i>p</i>=0.061) and functional status (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=3.7, <i>p</i>=0.055) approaching significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient demographics, comorbidities, and rehabilitative status may be significantly associated with rates of reherniation and revision surgery following lumbar microdiscectomy. We found that the significant predictors of revision surgery are functional dependence, advanced age, male sex, White race, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension. Early identification and attendance to the modifiable risk factors will aid patient guidance and outcomes following primary lumbar microdiscectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"244-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Hoang, Junho Song, Justin Tiao, Alex Ngan, Timothy Hoang, John J Corvi, Nikan K Namiri, Saad Chaudhary, Samuel K Cho, Andrew C Hecht, David Essig, Sohrab Virk, Austen D Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lumbar microdiscectomy is a commonly conducted surgical procedure for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Recurrence of herniation is a common cause of poor outcomes and the need for revision surgery, which occurs in as many as 21% of patients following primary discectomy. Identifying factors that are associated with the recurrence of herniation may be valuable for risk stratification and patient counseling. This study aimed to explore the relationship between various patient demographic variables and comorbidities and rates of reoperation after primary lumbar microdiscectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who were undergoing single-level primary lumbar microdiscectomy between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Patient demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI), and various comorbidities were compared between cohorts. To determine factors independently associated with the need for revision microdiscectomy, multivariable Poisson regressions were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a total of 65,121 primary discectomy patients were included, with a separate cohort of 6,971 patients undergoing revision discectomy. In comparison with primary patients, the revision cohort was older and had higher proportions of female and non-Hispanic White patients (all <i>c</i>0.001). The odds ratio for revision discectomy was greater in patients aged ≥65 years (1.577, 95% CI [1.480, 1.680]) than in those aged <45 years (<i>p</i>>0.001). The odds ratio for revision was lower in Black (0.821, 95% CI [0.738, 0.914]) and Hispanic patients (0.819, 95% CI [0.738, 0.909]) when compared with non-Hispanic White patients (<i>p</i><0.001). Obese patients with BMI ≥35 (1.193, 95% CI [1.103, 1.290]) were at greater risk of revision than those with BMI <25 (<i>p</i><0.001). Diabetes (1.326, 95% CI [1.242, 1.416], <i>p</i><0.001), functional dependence (1.411, 95% CI [1.183, 1.683], <i>p</i><0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (1.315, 95% CI [1.137, 1.512], <i>p</i><0.001), hypertension (1.398, 95% CI [1.330, 1.470], <i>p</i><0.001), and smoking (1.082, 95% CI [1.018, 1.151], <i>p</i>=0.012) were associated with greater risk of revision. Poisson log-linear regression demonstrated sex (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=19.9, <i>p</i><0.001), race (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=39.5, <i>p</i><0.001), diabetes (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=10.1, <i>p</i>=0.001), smoking (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=18.5, <i>p</i><0.001), hypertension (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=16.4, <i>p</i><0.001), age (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=102.4, <i>p</i><0.001), and BMI (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=4.7, <i>p</i>=0.029) as significant predictors of revision, with steroid use (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=3.5, <i>p</i>=0.061) and functional status (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>=3.7, <i>p</i>=0.055) approaching significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient demographics, comorbidities, and rehabilitative status may be significantly associated with rates of reherniation and revision surgery following lumbar microdiscectomy. We found that the significant predictors of revision surgery are functional dependence, advanced age, male sex, White race, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension. Early identification and attendance to the modifiable risk factors will aid patient guidance and outcomes following primary lumbar microdiscectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"244-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腰椎微椎间盘切除术是治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的常用手术方法。椎间盘突出的复发是导致预后不良和需要翻修手术的常见原因,在原发性椎间盘切除术后,多达21%的患者会出现这种情况。识别与疝复发相关的因素可能对风险分层和患者咨询有价值。本研究旨在探讨各种患者人口统计学变量与原发性腰椎微椎间盘切除术后合并症和再手术率之间的关系。方法:查询美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中2016年至2022年间接受单节段原发性腰椎微椎间盘切除术的患者。纳入资格由年龄bbb18岁和现行程序术语代码63030和63042确定。排除术前有败血症或癌症的患者。患者人口统计资料,包括年龄、种族、民族、体重指数(BMI)和各种合并症在队列之间进行比较。为了确定与微创椎间盘切除术翻修需要独立相关的因素,我们使用了多变量泊松回归。结果:本研究共纳入65121例原发性椎间盘切除术患者,另有6971例行翻修椎间盘切除术患者。与初始患者相比,修订队列年龄更大,女性和非西班牙裔白人患者的比例更高(均为c0.001)。≥65岁患者翻修椎间盘切除术的优势比(1.577,95% CI[1.480, 1.680])大于年龄≥65岁患者(0.001)。与非西班牙裔白人患者(ppppppp=0.012)相比,黑人(0.821,95% CI[0.738, 0.914])和西班牙裔患者(0.819,95% CI[0.738, 0.909])修订的优势比更低,修订的风险更高。泊松对数线性回归显示,性别(χ 2=19.9, pχ 2=39.5, pχ 2=10.1, p=0.001)、吸烟(χ 2=18.5, pχ 2=16.4, pχ 2=102.4, pχ 2=4.7, p=0.029)是修订的显著预测因素,使用类固醇(χ 2=3.5, p=0.061)和功能状态(χ 2=3.7, p=0.055)接近显著性。结论:患者人口统计学、合并症和康复状态可能与腰椎微椎间盘切除术后再突出和翻修手术的发生率显著相关。我们发现功能依赖、高龄、男性、白人、肥胖、糖尿病、吸烟和高血压是翻修手术的重要预测因素。早期识别和关注可改变的危险因素将有助于患者指导和原发性腰椎微椎间盘切除术后的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

Introduction: Lumbar microdiscectomy is a commonly conducted surgical procedure for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniations. Recurrence of herniation is a common cause of poor outcomes and the need for revision surgery, which occurs in as many as 21% of patients following primary discectomy. Identifying factors that are associated with the recurrence of herniation may be valuable for risk stratification and patient counseling. This study aimed to explore the relationship between various patient demographic variables and comorbidities and rates of reoperation after primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who were undergoing single-level primary lumbar microdiscectomy between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility for inclusion was determined by age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 63030 and 63042. Patients with preoperative sepsis or cancer were excluded. Patient demographics, including age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI), and various comorbidities were compared between cohorts. To determine factors independently associated with the need for revision microdiscectomy, multivariable Poisson regressions were utilized.

Results: In this study, a total of 65,121 primary discectomy patients were included, with a separate cohort of 6,971 patients undergoing revision discectomy. In comparison with primary patients, the revision cohort was older and had higher proportions of female and non-Hispanic White patients (all c0.001). The odds ratio for revision discectomy was greater in patients aged ≥65 years (1.577, 95% CI [1.480, 1.680]) than in those aged <45 years (p>0.001). The odds ratio for revision was lower in Black (0.821, 95% CI [0.738, 0.914]) and Hispanic patients (0.819, 95% CI [0.738, 0.909]) when compared with non-Hispanic White patients (p<0.001). Obese patients with BMI ≥35 (1.193, 95% CI [1.103, 1.290]) were at greater risk of revision than those with BMI <25 (p<0.001). Diabetes (1.326, 95% CI [1.242, 1.416], p<0.001), functional dependence (1.411, 95% CI [1.183, 1.683], p<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (1.315, 95% CI [1.137, 1.512], p<0.001), hypertension (1.398, 95% CI [1.330, 1.470], p<0.001), and smoking (1.082, 95% CI [1.018, 1.151], p=0.012) were associated with greater risk of revision. Poisson log-linear regression demonstrated sex (χ 2=19.9, p<0.001), race (χ 2=39.5, p<0.001), diabetes (χ 2=10.1, p=0.001), smoking (χ 2=18.5, p<0.001), hypertension (χ 2=16.4, p<0.001), age (χ 2=102.4, p<0.001), and BMI (χ 2=4.7, p=0.029) as significant predictors of revision, with steroid use (χ 2=3.5, p=0.061) and functional status (χ 2=3.7, p=0.055) approaching significance.

Conclusions: Patient demographics, comorbidities, and rehabilitative status may be significantly associated with rates of reherniation and revision surgery following lumbar microdiscectomy. We found that the significant predictors of revision surgery are functional dependence, advanced age, male sex, White race, obesity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension. Early identification and attendance to the modifiable risk factors will aid patient guidance and outcomes following primary lumbar microdiscectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信