患者和家属对实时获取电子健康信息的看法:一项社会媒体调查。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2487-7414
Caitlan S Pinotti, Rajdeep Pooni, Vincent Del Gaizo, Melanie Kohlheim, Emily Schildt, Alysha J Taxter, Tova Ronis
{"title":"患者和家属对实时获取电子健康信息的看法:一项社会媒体调查。","authors":"Caitlan S Pinotti, Rajdeep Pooni, Vincent Del Gaizo, Melanie Kohlheim, Emily Schildt, Alysha J Taxter, Tova Ronis","doi":"10.1055/a-2487-7414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study seeks to understand pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' utilization and perceptions of immediate access to their electronic health information (EHI) via patient portals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> An anonymous, 23-question Qualtrics survey was distributed via social media to patients and families with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The survey link and Quick Response (QR) code were posted on disease-specific Facebook accounts. Descriptive statistics were used with a thematic content analysis performed on free-text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The survey received 253 eligible responses. Nearly 48% of participants reported accessing their electronic patient portal >12 times in the last year, while only 0.4% (one respondent) reported accessing it zero times and 8% reported accessing it 1 to 2 times. Following a medical appointment, 45% reported regularly accessing their portal the same day as their appointment, 36% when they get an alert for new results, and 0.8% only in response to a healthcare provider message. About 98% use the patient portal to access laboratory results, 98% provider notes, 80% healthcare provider messages, 64% imaging results, 53% appointments, and 28% medications. Thematic content analysis found that respondents use the portal for coordination of care and to advocate for themselves or their child. The emotional impact of access to EHI without provider explanation was variable by respondent, with some reporting increased worry and some less worry. Many respondents (18%) found value in posting results to social media sites for help in interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' strong portal engagement and expectation for immediate access to EHI through the patient portal. Although some did report that access to EHI without provider input can increase worry or anxiety, families perceive the patient portal as a tool for self-advocacy and engagement in care, leading to a stronger sense of their role as a member of the care team.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 2","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Family Perceptions of Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Information: A Social Media Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlan S Pinotti, Rajdeep Pooni, Vincent Del Gaizo, Melanie Kohlheim, Emily Schildt, Alysha J Taxter, Tova Ronis\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2487-7414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study seeks to understand pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' utilization and perceptions of immediate access to their electronic health information (EHI) via patient portals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> An anonymous, 23-question Qualtrics survey was distributed via social media to patients and families with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The survey link and Quick Response (QR) code were posted on disease-specific Facebook accounts. Descriptive statistics were used with a thematic content analysis performed on free-text responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The survey received 253 eligible responses. Nearly 48% of participants reported accessing their electronic patient portal >12 times in the last year, while only 0.4% (one respondent) reported accessing it zero times and 8% reported accessing it 1 to 2 times. Following a medical appointment, 45% reported regularly accessing their portal the same day as their appointment, 36% when they get an alert for new results, and 0.8% only in response to a healthcare provider message. About 98% use the patient portal to access laboratory results, 98% provider notes, 80% healthcare provider messages, 64% imaging results, 53% appointments, and 28% medications. Thematic content analysis found that respondents use the portal for coordination of care and to advocate for themselves or their child. The emotional impact of access to EHI without provider explanation was variable by respondent, with some reporting increased worry and some less worry. Many respondents (18%) found value in posting results to social media sites for help in interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' strong portal engagement and expectation for immediate access to EHI through the patient portal. Although some did report that access to EHI without provider input can increase worry or anxiety, families perceive the patient portal as a tool for self-advocacy and engagement in care, leading to a stronger sense of their role as a member of the care team.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"327-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2487-7414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2487-7414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解儿童风湿病患者和护理人员对通过患者门户网站即时访问其电子健康信息(EHI)的使用情况和看法。方法:通过社交媒体向患有儿童风湿病的患者和家庭分发一份包含23个问题的匿名质量调查。调查链接和快速反应码(QR码)被发布在特定疾病的Facebook账户上。描述性统计与主题内容分析一起用于自由文本回复。结果:本次调查共收到253份符合要求的回复。近48%的参与者报告去年12次访问他们的电子患者门户网站>,而只有0.4%(一名受访者)报告访问0次,8%报告访问1至2次。在医疗预约之后,45%的人表示会在预约当天定期访问门户网站,36%的人会在收到新结果的提醒时访问门户网站,0.8%的人只会响应医疗保健提供商的消息。大约98%的人使用患者门户访问实验室结果、98%的提供者记录、80%的医疗保健提供者消息、64%的成像结果、53%的预约和28%的药物。专题内容分析发现,受访者使用门户网站进行护理协调,并为自己或子女进行宣传。在没有提供者解释的情况下获得EHI的情绪影响因被调查者而异,一些人报告担心增加,一些人报告担心减少。许多受访者(18%)认为将结果发布到社交媒体网站以寻求解释帮助是有价值的。结论:本研究表明,儿童风湿病患者和护理人员对通过患者门户网站立即访问EHI有强烈的门户参与和期望。虽然有些人确实报告说,在没有提供者参与的情况下获得EHI可能会增加担忧或焦虑,但家庭将患者门户视为自我宣传和参与护理的工具,从而使他们更强烈地意识到自己作为护理团队成员的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and Family Perceptions of Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Information: A Social Media Survey.

Objective:  This study seeks to understand pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' utilization and perceptions of immediate access to their electronic health information (EHI) via patient portals.

Methods:  An anonymous, 23-question Qualtrics survey was distributed via social media to patients and families with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The survey link and Quick Response (QR) code were posted on disease-specific Facebook accounts. Descriptive statistics were used with a thematic content analysis performed on free-text responses.

Results:  The survey received 253 eligible responses. Nearly 48% of participants reported accessing their electronic patient portal >12 times in the last year, while only 0.4% (one respondent) reported accessing it zero times and 8% reported accessing it 1 to 2 times. Following a medical appointment, 45% reported regularly accessing their portal the same day as their appointment, 36% when they get an alert for new results, and 0.8% only in response to a healthcare provider message. About 98% use the patient portal to access laboratory results, 98% provider notes, 80% healthcare provider messages, 64% imaging results, 53% appointments, and 28% medications. Thematic content analysis found that respondents use the portal for coordination of care and to advocate for themselves or their child. The emotional impact of access to EHI without provider explanation was variable by respondent, with some reporting increased worry and some less worry. Many respondents (18%) found value in posting results to social media sites for help in interpretation.

Conclusion:  This study demonstrates pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' strong portal engagement and expectation for immediate access to EHI through the patient portal. Although some did report that access to EHI without provider input can increase worry or anxiety, families perceive the patient portal as a tool for self-advocacy and engagement in care, leading to a stronger sense of their role as a member of the care team.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信