内镜下食管胃肠道间质瘤切除术的可行性。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yanwu Zhou, Ruyi Peng, Xingcen Chen, Xinxin Xie, Jiefei Chen, Rong Li
{"title":"内镜下食管胃肠道间质瘤切除术的可行性。","authors":"Yanwu Zhou, Ruyi Peng, Xingcen Chen, Xinxin Xie, Jiefei Chen, Rong Li","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11763-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (e-GIST) is a rare type that is distinct from gastric GIST (g-GIST), and comprehensive studies are limited. The present study aims to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between e-GIST and g-GIST, evaluate the feasibility of using endoscopic resection (ER) to treat e-GIST, and explore its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GISTs from January 2010 to May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Comprehensive clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and systematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 46 e-GIST patients and 366 g-GIST patients were enrolled. The distinct characteristics of e-GIST were as follows: (1) greater prevalence in male patients than in female patients, in contrast with the predominance of females among patients with g-GIST; (2) the median onset age was 61 years (range 20 to 80 years), with 58.7% of patients aged > 65 years in e-GIST; (3) the proportion of larger tumors was much more frequent in the esophagus; (4) greater incidence of ulceration/bleeding than in g-GIST; (5) increased mitotic count (≥ 5/50HPF). These factors collectively contribute to significantly shorter overall survival in e-GIST patients. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) were comparable to those of surgical resection for selected e-GISTs (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding, and mitotic count < 5/50HPF), with no significant differences in recurrence rate or survival time between these procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the distinct clinicopathological features of e-GIST from those of g-GIST with increased tumor size, ulceration/bleeding, and higher mitotic counts identified as significant prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that ER is a feasible and effective treatment approach for carefully selected e-GIST cases (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding), as assessed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). These results provide valuable insights for the management of this rare tumor subtype.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3718-3726"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility of endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Yanwu Zhou, Ruyi Peng, Xingcen Chen, Xinxin Xie, Jiefei Chen, Rong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11763-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (e-GIST) is a rare type that is distinct from gastric GIST (g-GIST), and comprehensive studies are limited. The present study aims to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between e-GIST and g-GIST, evaluate the feasibility of using endoscopic resection (ER) to treat e-GIST, and explore its clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with GISTs from January 2010 to May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Comprehensive clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and systematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 46 e-GIST patients and 366 g-GIST patients were enrolled. The distinct characteristics of e-GIST were as follows: (1) greater prevalence in male patients than in female patients, in contrast with the predominance of females among patients with g-GIST; (2) the median onset age was 61 years (range 20 to 80 years), with 58.7% of patients aged > 65 years in e-GIST; (3) the proportion of larger tumors was much more frequent in the esophagus; (4) greater incidence of ulceration/bleeding than in g-GIST; (5) increased mitotic count (≥ 5/50HPF). These factors collectively contribute to significantly shorter overall survival in e-GIST patients. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) were comparable to those of surgical resection for selected e-GISTs (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding, and mitotic count < 5/50HPF), with no significant differences in recurrence rate or survival time between these procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the distinct clinicopathological features of e-GIST from those of g-GIST with increased tumor size, ulceration/bleeding, and higher mitotic counts identified as significant prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that ER is a feasible and effective treatment approach for carefully selected e-GIST cases (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding), as assessed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). These results provide valuable insights for the management of this rare tumor subtype.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3718-3726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11763-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11763-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:食管胃肠道间质瘤(e-GIST)是一种不同于胃间质瘤(g-GIST)的罕见类型,综合研究有限。本研究旨在比较e-GIST与g-GIST的临床病理特征,评估内镜切除(ER)治疗e-GIST的可行性,并探讨其临床意义。方法:纳入2010年1月至2019年5月的gist患者。收集并系统分析了全面的临床病理、内镜和随访资料。结果:共纳入46例e-GIST患者和366例g-GIST患者。e-GIST的显著特征是:(1)男性患者的患病率高于女性患者,而g-GIST患者中以女性为主;(2)中位发病年龄为61岁(20 ~ 80岁),其中58.7%的e-GIST患者年龄为bb0 ~ 65岁;(3)较大肿瘤在食道的比例要高得多;(4)溃疡/出血发生率高于g-GIST;(5)有丝分裂计数增加(≥5/ 50hpf)。这些因素共同导致e-GIST患者的总生存期明显缩短。重要的是,我们的分析显示内镜切除(ER)的结果与选择的e-GIST(肿瘤直径≤5cm,没有溃疡/出血,有丝分裂计数)的手术切除的结果相当。结论:本研究强调了e-GIST与g-GIST不同的临床病理特征,肿瘤大小增加,溃疡/出血,有丝分裂计数增加被认为是重要的预后因素。我们的研究结果表明,经内镜超声(EUS)评估,对于精心挑选的e-GIST病例(肿瘤直径≤5cm,无溃疡/出血),ER是一种可行且有效的治疗方法。这些结果为这种罕见肿瘤亚型的治疗提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The feasibility of endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Objectives: Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (e-GIST) is a rare type that is distinct from gastric GIST (g-GIST), and comprehensive studies are limited. The present study aims to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between e-GIST and g-GIST, evaluate the feasibility of using endoscopic resection (ER) to treat e-GIST, and explore its clinical implications.

Methods: Patients with GISTs from January 2010 to May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Comprehensive clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and systematically analyzed.

Results: There were 46 e-GIST patients and 366 g-GIST patients were enrolled. The distinct characteristics of e-GIST were as follows: (1) greater prevalence in male patients than in female patients, in contrast with the predominance of females among patients with g-GIST; (2) the median onset age was 61 years (range 20 to 80 years), with 58.7% of patients aged > 65 years in e-GIST; (3) the proportion of larger tumors was much more frequent in the esophagus; (4) greater incidence of ulceration/bleeding than in g-GIST; (5) increased mitotic count (≥ 5/50HPF). These factors collectively contribute to significantly shorter overall survival in e-GIST patients. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) were comparable to those of surgical resection for selected e-GISTs (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding, and mitotic count < 5/50HPF), with no significant differences in recurrence rate or survival time between these procedures.

Conclusions: This study highlights the distinct clinicopathological features of e-GIST from those of g-GIST with increased tumor size, ulceration/bleeding, and higher mitotic counts identified as significant prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that ER is a feasible and effective treatment approach for carefully selected e-GIST cases (tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm, without ulceration/bleeding), as assessed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). These results provide valuable insights for the management of this rare tumor subtype.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信