每日与隔日洗必泰沐浴对重症监护病房中心线相关血流感染的长期影响:一项为期四年的观察性研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yi-Chen Lin, Hao-Yun Chang, Hui-Ji Lin, Pao-Yu Chen, Shiao-Pei Wang, Pao-Yu Chuang, Yee-Chun Chen, Chia-Chun Tang
{"title":"每日与隔日洗必泰沐浴对重症监护病房中心线相关血流感染的长期影响:一项为期四年的观察性研究","authors":"Yi-Chen Lin, Hao-Yun Chang, Hui-Ji Lin, Pao-Yu Chen, Shiao-Pei Wang, Pao-Yu Chuang, Yee-Chun Chen, Chia-Chun Tang","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing may reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in critically ill patients, but evidence remains inconclusive, particularly regarding long-term effects and varying frequencies of use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between different CHG bathing frequencies and CLABSI rates in medical intensive care units (MICUs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted in three MICUs in northern Taiwan from March 2018 to June 2022. One MICU implemented daily CHG bathing for 21 months, followed by every-other-day CHG bathing for 30 months, while two MICUs used water and soap as standard care. CLABSI rates per 1000 central line days and other clinical outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 46 409 central line days and 5482 admissions, 357 CLABSI events were recorded. No significant difference in CLABSI rates was found between the CHG and standard care groups (IRR = 1.1, p = 0.36) or between the different CHG bathing frequencies (IRR = 0.68, p = 0.06). Other clinical outcomes showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CHG bathing, whether daily or alternate-day, was not significantly associated with lowering CLABSI rates in MICU. The association may vary depending on hospital-specific conditions and infection profiles.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>CHG bathing should not be regarded as a universal infection control strategy in ICUs. It should be evaluated within the context of each ICU's specific conditions and infection prevention strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Effects of Daily Versus Alternate-Day Chlorhexidine Bathing on Central-Line-Associated Blood Stream Infection in Medical Intensive Care Units: A Four-Year Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Chen Lin, Hao-Yun Chang, Hui-Ji Lin, Pao-Yu Chen, Shiao-Pei Wang, Pao-Yu Chuang, Yee-Chun Chen, Chia-Chun Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing may reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in critically ill patients, but evidence remains inconclusive, particularly regarding long-term effects and varying frequencies of use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to examine the association between different CHG bathing frequencies and CLABSI rates in medical intensive care units (MICUs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted in three MICUs in northern Taiwan from March 2018 to June 2022. One MICU implemented daily CHG bathing for 21 months, followed by every-other-day CHG bathing for 30 months, while two MICUs used water and soap as standard care. CLABSI rates per 1000 central line days and other clinical outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 46 409 central line days and 5482 admissions, 357 CLABSI events were recorded. No significant difference in CLABSI rates was found between the CHG and standard care groups (IRR = 1.1, p = 0.36) or between the different CHG bathing frequencies (IRR = 0.68, p = 0.06). Other clinical outcomes showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CHG bathing, whether daily or alternate-day, was not significantly associated with lowering CLABSI rates in MICU. The association may vary depending on hospital-specific conditions and infection profiles.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>CHG bathing should not be regarded as a universal infection control strategy in ICUs. It should be evaluated within the context of each ICU's specific conditions and infection prevention strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"e70049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:每日葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)沐浴可能减少危重患者的中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI),但证据仍不确定,特别是关于长期效果和不同使用频率的证据。目的:本研究旨在探讨重症监护病房(MICUs)不同CHG沐浴频率与CLABSI发生率之间的关系。研究设计:回顾性分析2018年3月至2022年6月台湾北部3个micu。一个MICU实施每日CHG沐浴21个月,随后每隔一天CHG沐浴30个月,而两个MICU使用水和肥皂作为标准护理。比较了每1000中心线日CLABSI率和其他临床结果。结果:在46409个中心线天数和5482例入院患者中,记录了357例CLABSI事件。CHG组与标准护理组之间CLABSI发生率无显著差异(IRR = 1.1, p = 0.36),不同CHG沐浴频率之间CLABSI发生率无显著差异(IRR = 0.68, p = 0.06)。其他临床结果无显著差异。结论:CHG沐浴,无论是每天还是隔天,与降低MICU患者CLABSI发生率无显著相关。这种关联可能因医院特定条件和感染概况而异。与临床实践的相关性:CHG洗浴不应被视为icu的普遍感染控制策略。应在每个ICU的具体情况和感染预防策略的背景下进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Effects of Daily Versus Alternate-Day Chlorhexidine Bathing on Central-Line-Associated Blood Stream Infection in Medical Intensive Care Units: A Four-Year Observational Study.

Background: Daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing may reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in critically ill patients, but evidence remains inconclusive, particularly regarding long-term effects and varying frequencies of use.

Aim: This study aimed to examine the association between different CHG bathing frequencies and CLABSI rates in medical intensive care units (MICUs).

Study design: A retrospective analysis was conducted in three MICUs in northern Taiwan from March 2018 to June 2022. One MICU implemented daily CHG bathing for 21 months, followed by every-other-day CHG bathing for 30 months, while two MICUs used water and soap as standard care. CLABSI rates per 1000 central line days and other clinical outcomes were compared.

Results: Across 46 409 central line days and 5482 admissions, 357 CLABSI events were recorded. No significant difference in CLABSI rates was found between the CHG and standard care groups (IRR = 1.1, p = 0.36) or between the different CHG bathing frequencies (IRR = 0.68, p = 0.06). Other clinical outcomes showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: CHG bathing, whether daily or alternate-day, was not significantly associated with lowering CLABSI rates in MICU. The association may vary depending on hospital-specific conditions and infection profiles.

Relevance to clinical practice: CHG bathing should not be regarded as a universal infection control strategy in ICUs. It should be evaluated within the context of each ICU's specific conditions and infection prevention strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信