环境水体中大肠杆菌和隐孢子虫被动采样监测的评价。

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029
Ilya Law, Erin Becker, Brandon S Spoja, Katrina Kobal, Martha Yiridoe, Abdul Alashraf, Beth L Parker, David T McCarthy, Heather M Murphy
{"title":"环境水体中大肠杆菌和隐孢子虫被动采样监测的评价。","authors":"Ilya Law, Erin Becker, Brandon S Spoja, Katrina Kobal, Martha Yiridoe, Abdul Alashraf, Beth L Parker, David T McCarthy, Heather M Murphy","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Passive sampling has shown promise as an alternative approach for monitoring of pathogens in aquatic matrices. We conducted two controlled experiments to compare the efficacy of membrane passive sampling to composite sampling in both wastewater and surface water for the detection of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. We also investigated the relative uptake of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> onto membrane passive samplers over time. Both sampling methods returned positive detections of <i>E. coli</i> at all deployment times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in both water matrices. Passive sampling for <i>Cryptosporidium</i> showed similar detection rates as composite samples in surface water (31% passive; 41% composite) and wastewater (76% passive; 86% composite). We found significant linear uptake of <i>E. coli</i> onto passive samplers up to 96 h in surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.932; <i>p</i> = 0.002). In wastewater, maximum passive sampler uptake of <i>E. coli</i> was reached after 24 h. For <i>Cryptosporidium</i>, linear uptake was observed up to 96 h for both surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.805; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and wastewater (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.877; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Our results support that membrane passive samplers may be used for the detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> and <i>E. coli</i> in surface waters for up to 96 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 4","pages":"1673-1682"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Passive Sampling for the Monitoring of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in Environmental Waters.\",\"authors\":\"Ilya Law, Erin Becker, Brandon S Spoja, Katrina Kobal, Martha Yiridoe, Abdul Alashraf, Beth L Parker, David T McCarthy, Heather M Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Passive sampling has shown promise as an alternative approach for monitoring of pathogens in aquatic matrices. We conducted two controlled experiments to compare the efficacy of membrane passive sampling to composite sampling in both wastewater and surface water for the detection of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. We also investigated the relative uptake of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> onto membrane passive samplers over time. Both sampling methods returned positive detections of <i>E. coli</i> at all deployment times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in both water matrices. Passive sampling for <i>Cryptosporidium</i> showed similar detection rates as composite samples in surface water (31% passive; 41% composite) and wastewater (76% passive; 86% composite). We found significant linear uptake of <i>E. coli</i> onto passive samplers up to 96 h in surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.932; <i>p</i> = 0.002). In wastewater, maximum passive sampler uptake of <i>E. coli</i> was reached after 24 h. For <i>Cryptosporidium</i>, linear uptake was observed up to 96 h for both surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.805; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and wastewater (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.877; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Our results support that membrane passive samplers may be used for the detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> and <i>E. coli</i> in surface waters for up to 96 h.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"1673-1682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被动取样作为监测水生基质中病原体的一种替代方法已显示出前景。我们进行了两个对照实验,比较了膜被动采样与复合采样在废水和地表水中检测大肠杆菌和隐孢子虫的效果。随着时间的推移,我们还研究了大肠杆菌和隐孢子虫在膜被动采样器上的相对摄取。两种采样方法在所有部署时间(4、8、24、48、72和96 h)在两种水基质中均检测出大肠杆菌阳性。地表水中隐孢子虫被动取样检出率与复合取样相似(31%被动取样;41%复合材料)和废水(76%被动;复合86%)。我们发现,在地表水中,被动采样器对大肠杆菌的线性吸收长达96小时(r2 = 0.932;P = 0.002)。在废水中,大肠杆菌的被动吸收量在24 h后达到最大。对于隐孢子虫,在96 h内,对地表水的线性吸收量均达到最大值(r2 = 0.805;p = 0.015)和废水(r2 = 0.877;P = 0.006)。本研究结果支持膜被动采样器可用于地表水隐孢子虫和大肠杆菌检测长达96 h。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Passive Sampling for the Monitoring of E. coli and Cryptosporidium spp. in Environmental Waters.

Passive sampling has shown promise as an alternative approach for monitoring of pathogens in aquatic matrices. We conducted two controlled experiments to compare the efficacy of membrane passive sampling to composite sampling in both wastewater and surface water for the detection of Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium. We also investigated the relative uptake of E. coli and Cryptosporidium onto membrane passive samplers over time. Both sampling methods returned positive detections of E. coli at all deployment times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in both water matrices. Passive sampling for Cryptosporidium showed similar detection rates as composite samples in surface water (31% passive; 41% composite) and wastewater (76% passive; 86% composite). We found significant linear uptake of E. coli onto passive samplers up to 96 h in surface water (R 2 = 0.932; p = 0.002). In wastewater, maximum passive sampler uptake of E. coli was reached after 24 h. For Cryptosporidium, linear uptake was observed up to 96 h for both surface water (R 2 = 0.805; p = 0.015) and wastewater (R 2 = 0.877; p = 0.006). Our results support that membrane passive samplers may be used for the detection of Cryptosporidium and E. coli in surface waters for up to 96 h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信