特发性颅内高压静脉窦狭窄支架置入术成功后复发后再次支架置入术。

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100
Salvatore A D'Amato, Juan Carlos Martinez Gutierrez, Hussein A Zeineddine, Eric Claude Mohan, Tien Nguyen, Cybele Woon, Rosa Tang, Peng Roc Chen
{"title":"特发性颅内高压静脉窦狭窄支架置入术成功后复发后再次支架置入术。","authors":"Salvatore A D'Amato, Juan Carlos Martinez Gutierrez, Hussein A Zeineddine, Eric Claude Mohan, Tien Nguyen, Cybele Woon, Rosa Tang, Peng Roc Chen","doi":"10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has been an effective treatment modality. Among patients who experience recurrent symptoms and develop new stenosis, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of rescue re-stenting in patients with recurrence after prior successful stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, retrospective review from a prospectively maintained IIH registry. Between 2012 and 2023, patients who underwent interventions for confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS were included. The cohort was divided into those who underwent a single stenting procedure (single stent group) and those who underwent re-stenting due to recurrence of symptoms and new angiographic stenosis (re-stent group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety seven patients were included: 87 in the single stent group and 10 in the re-stent group, with a median age of 32 (interquartile range 26-38). 94% were female. Both groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. There was similar improvement in papilledema and tinnitus. Headache improvement was greater in the single stent group at 6 weeks (88.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group), but similar at 6 months post-procedure. For visual disturbances, there was similar improvement at 6 weeks, but greater improvement in the single stent group at 6 months post-procedure (86.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group). None of the re-stented patients required rescue ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-stenting among IIH patients with recurrent symptoms after initial successful VSS stenting is feasible with similar efficacy in improving symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Stenting Following Recurrence after Successful Venous Sinus Stenosis Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore A D'Amato, Juan Carlos Martinez Gutierrez, Hussein A Zeineddine, Eric Claude Mohan, Tien Nguyen, Cybele Woon, Rosa Tang, Peng Roc Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has been an effective treatment modality. Among patients who experience recurrent symptoms and develop new stenosis, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of rescue re-stenting in patients with recurrence after prior successful stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single center, retrospective review from a prospectively maintained IIH registry. Between 2012 and 2023, patients who underwent interventions for confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS were included. The cohort was divided into those who underwent a single stenting procedure (single stent group) and those who underwent re-stenting due to recurrence of symptoms and new angiographic stenosis (re-stent group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety seven patients were included: 87 in the single stent group and 10 in the re-stent group, with a median age of 32 (interquartile range 26-38). 94% were female. Both groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. There was similar improvement in papilledema and tinnitus. Headache improvement was greater in the single stent group at 6 weeks (88.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group), but similar at 6 months post-procedure. For visual disturbances, there was similar improvement at 6 weeks, but greater improvement in the single stent group at 6 months post-procedure (86.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group). None of the re-stented patients required rescue ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-stenting among IIH patients with recurrent symptoms after initial successful VSS stenting is feasible with similar efficacy in improving symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:治疗难治性特发性颅内高压(IIH),静脉窦狭窄(VSS)支架置入术是一种有效的治疗方法。在出现复发症状并出现新的狭窄的患者中,最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨在先前支架置入术成功后复发的患者中再次支架置入术的作用。方法:这是一项单中心的回顾性研究,来自一个前瞻性的IIH登记处。在2012年至2023年期间,接受确诊IIH和血管造影证实VSS干预的患者被纳入研究。该队列分为接受单一支架手术的患者(单一支架组)和因症状复发和新的血管造影狭窄而再次接受支架手术的患者(再次支架组)。结果:纳入97例患者:单支架组87例,再支架组10例,中位年龄32岁(四分位数间距26-38岁)。94%是女性。两组具有相似的基线人口统计学和临床特征。乳头水肿和耳鸣也有类似的改善。在6周时,单支架组的头痛改善更大(88.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.04,单支架组vs.再支架组),但在术后6个月时相似。对于视力障碍,6周时有相似的改善,但术后6个月时单支架组改善更大(86.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.04,单支架组vs.再支架组)。所有重新植入支架的患者均无需置放脑室腹腔分流器。结论:首次VSS支架置入术成功后出现复发症状的IIH患者再次支架置入术是可行的,其改善症状的效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-Stenting Following Recurrence after Successful Venous Sinus Stenosis Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Objective: In medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has been an effective treatment modality. Among patients who experience recurrent symptoms and develop new stenosis, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of rescue re-stenting in patients with recurrence after prior successful stenting.

Methods: This was a single center, retrospective review from a prospectively maintained IIH registry. Between 2012 and 2023, patients who underwent interventions for confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS were included. The cohort was divided into those who underwent a single stenting procedure (single stent group) and those who underwent re-stenting due to recurrence of symptoms and new angiographic stenosis (re-stent group).

Results: Ninety seven patients were included: 87 in the single stent group and 10 in the re-stent group, with a median age of 32 (interquartile range 26-38). 94% were female. Both groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. There was similar improvement in papilledema and tinnitus. Headache improvement was greater in the single stent group at 6 weeks (88.4% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group), but similar at 6 months post-procedure. For visual disturbances, there was similar improvement at 6 weeks, but greater improvement in the single stent group at 6 months post-procedure (86.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.04, single vs. re-stent group). None of the re-stented patients required rescue ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

Conclusion: Re-stenting among IIH patients with recurrent symptoms after initial successful VSS stenting is feasible with similar efficacy in improving symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信