{"title":"全身振动疗法对脑瘫儿童身体功能的影响:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chi-Hung Huang, Chi-Ying Chen, Ho-Wei Lin, Yu-Fen Chiu, Li-Fong Lin, Ka-Wai Tam, Tung-Wu Lu, Shih-Wen Chiang, Yi-Chun Kuan","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although whole-body vibration (WBV) is often employed alongside traditional physical therapies to treat cerebral palsy, its effects on motor function remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of WBV either alone or in combination with other therapies in children with cerebral palsy, compared with control groups that underwent traditional physical therapy or remained untreated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed randomized controlled trials published up to September 2024 that assessed motor function in WBV and control groups, including those receiving conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The random-effects model was used to analyze the outcomes of these trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 23 studies involving 729 participants. Compared with the control group, the WBV group exhibited significantly greater improvements in walking speed (pooled mean difference: 14.26 cm/s [95% CI = 6.45 to 22.08 cm/s]), Timed \"Up & Go\" Test results (pooled mean difference = -2.52 seconds [95% CI = -3.66 to -1.37 seconds]), Gross Motor Function Measure scores (total score: pooled mean difference = 0.69 [95% CI = 0.30 to 1.08]; dimension D: pooled mean difference = 3.41 [95% CI = 0.53 to 6.29]; dimension E: pooled mean difference = 3.28 [95% CI = 1.36 to 5.20]), and overall stability index values (standardized mean difference = -1.20 [95% CI = -2.28 to -0.11]). The Modified Ashworth Scale results varied between the muscle groups, and no intolerable adverse effects of WBV were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WBV improves postural control and motor performance in children with cerebral palsy by enhancing walking speed, Timed \"Up & Go\" Test performance, and gross motor function without causing intolerable adverse effects. However, the certainty of the current evidence on the topic is very low or low. Additional well-structured trials are required to determine the optimal intensity of WBV treatment.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Given its therapeutic benefits and safety, WBV may be considered as an adjunctive therapy for managing cerebral palsy, particularly for children with spastic cerebral palsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Physical Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Chi-Hung Huang, Chi-Ying Chen, Ho-Wei Lin, Yu-Fen Chiu, Li-Fong Lin, Ka-Wai Tam, Tung-Wu Lu, Shih-Wen Chiang, Yi-Chun Kuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although whole-body vibration (WBV) is often employed alongside traditional physical therapies to treat cerebral palsy, its effects on motor function remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of WBV either alone or in combination with other therapies in children with cerebral palsy, compared with control groups that underwent traditional physical therapy or remained untreated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed randomized controlled trials published up to September 2024 that assessed motor function in WBV and control groups, including those receiving conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The random-effects model was used to analyze the outcomes of these trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 23 studies involving 729 participants. Compared with the control group, the WBV group exhibited significantly greater improvements in walking speed (pooled mean difference: 14.26 cm/s [95% CI = 6.45 to 22.08 cm/s]), Timed \\\"Up & Go\\\" Test results (pooled mean difference = -2.52 seconds [95% CI = -3.66 to -1.37 seconds]), Gross Motor Function Measure scores (total score: pooled mean difference = 0.69 [95% CI = 0.30 to 1.08]; dimension D: pooled mean difference = 3.41 [95% CI = 0.53 to 6.29]; dimension E: pooled mean difference = 3.28 [95% CI = 1.36 to 5.20]), and overall stability index values (standardized mean difference = -1.20 [95% CI = -2.28 to -0.11]). The Modified Ashworth Scale results varied between the muscle groups, and no intolerable adverse effects of WBV were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WBV improves postural control and motor performance in children with cerebral palsy by enhancing walking speed, Timed \\\"Up & Go\\\" Test performance, and gross motor function without causing intolerable adverse effects. However, the certainty of the current evidence on the topic is very low or low. Additional well-structured trials are required to determine the optimal intensity of WBV treatment.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Given its therapeutic benefits and safety, WBV may be considered as an adjunctive therapy for managing cerebral palsy, particularly for children with spastic cerebral palsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf052\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:虽然全身振动(WBV)通常与传统物理疗法一起用于治疗脑瘫,但其对运动功能的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究对脑瘫儿童单独或联合其他治疗方法的效果进行了研究,并与接受传统物理治疗或未接受治疗的对照组进行了比较。方法:我们分析了截至2024年9月发表的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了WBV和对照组的运动功能,包括接受常规物理治疗或不进行干预的对照组。文章检索自PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆。随机效应模型用于分析这些试验的结果。结果:我们检索了23项研究,涉及729名参与者。与对照组相比,WBV组表现出明显能改善步行速度(池平均差:14.26 cm / s [95% CI = 6.45 - 22.08厘米/秒]),定时“&”测试结果(池平均差= -2.52秒[95% CI = -3.66到-1.37秒]),粗大运动功能测量得分(总分:池平均差= 0.69 (95% CI = 0.30 - 1.08);维度D:合并平均差= 3.41 [95% CI = 0.53 ~ 6.29];维度E:合并平均差值= 3.28 [95% CI = 1.36 ~ 5.20]),总体稳定性指数值(标准化平均差值= -1.20 [95% CI = -2.28 ~ -0.11])。改良Ashworth量表结果在肌肉群之间有所不同,没有报道WBV不可忍受的不良反应。结论:WBV通过提高行走速度、定时“Up & Go”测试成绩和大运动功能来改善脑瘫儿童的姿势控制和运动表现,而不会引起无法忍受的不良反应。然而,目前关于该主题的证据的确定性非常低或很低。需要更多结构良好的试验来确定WBV治疗的最佳强度。影响:考虑到其治疗益处和安全性,白脑脊髓灰质炎可能被视为治疗脑瘫的辅助疗法,特别是对于痉挛性脑瘫儿童。
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Physical Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Objective: Although whole-body vibration (WBV) is often employed alongside traditional physical therapies to treat cerebral palsy, its effects on motor function remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of WBV either alone or in combination with other therapies in children with cerebral palsy, compared with control groups that underwent traditional physical therapy or remained untreated.
Methods: We analyzed randomized controlled trials published up to September 2024 that assessed motor function in WBV and control groups, including those receiving conventional physical therapy or no intervention. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The random-effects model was used to analyze the outcomes of these trials.
Results: Our search yielded 23 studies involving 729 participants. Compared with the control group, the WBV group exhibited significantly greater improvements in walking speed (pooled mean difference: 14.26 cm/s [95% CI = 6.45 to 22.08 cm/s]), Timed "Up & Go" Test results (pooled mean difference = -2.52 seconds [95% CI = -3.66 to -1.37 seconds]), Gross Motor Function Measure scores (total score: pooled mean difference = 0.69 [95% CI = 0.30 to 1.08]; dimension D: pooled mean difference = 3.41 [95% CI = 0.53 to 6.29]; dimension E: pooled mean difference = 3.28 [95% CI = 1.36 to 5.20]), and overall stability index values (standardized mean difference = -1.20 [95% CI = -2.28 to -0.11]). The Modified Ashworth Scale results varied between the muscle groups, and no intolerable adverse effects of WBV were reported.
Conclusion: WBV improves postural control and motor performance in children with cerebral palsy by enhancing walking speed, Timed "Up & Go" Test performance, and gross motor function without causing intolerable adverse effects. However, the certainty of the current evidence on the topic is very low or low. Additional well-structured trials are required to determine the optimal intensity of WBV treatment.
Impact: Given its therapeutic benefits and safety, WBV may be considered as an adjunctive therapy for managing cerebral palsy, particularly for children with spastic cerebral palsy.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.