揭露不平等:整形外科健康差异研究的现状。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Isabel A Snee, Kishan S Shah, Luke J Llaurado, Laura K Tom
{"title":"揭露不平等:整形外科健康差异研究的现状。","authors":"Isabel A Snee, Kishan S Shah, Luke J Llaurado, Laura K Tom","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health disparities persist within plastic and reconstructive surgery, disproportionately impacting patient populations based on social determinants of health. These disparities contribute to delayed treatment, higher complication rates, and worse aesthetic and functional outcomes, ultimately affecting quality of life and patient well-being. While progress has been made in identifying these inequities, there remains a need for targeted research to design, implement, and assess interventions that directly address these disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of recent PRS literature to evaluate the proportion of studies focused on identifying, understanding, and addressing disparities. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search identified national studies published since 2019 that addressed healthcare disparities specific to PRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 173 studies included, 81.5% focused on identifying disparities, while only 10.4% aimed to understand causative factors, and an additional 8.10% implemented interventions to reduce disparities. Disparities were most reported in breast surgery, followed by general reconstruction and non-breast microsurgery, with minority racial groups, lower socioeconomic status, and women experiencing the greatest burden of inequity. Most studies evaluated barriers such as treatment access, offers of care, and post-surgical complications, yet few studies progressed to implementing solutions that address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To achieve meaningful progress, PRS disparities research must move beyond identifying inequities to actively reducing them through evidence-based interventions, policy initiatives, and patient-centered care. Addressing these inequities can improve access to treatment, surgical outcomes, and quality of life for underserved populations. By prioritizing actionable solutions, the field of PRS can achieve more equitable healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Isabel A Snee, Kishan S Shah, Luke J Llaurado, Laura K Tom\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health disparities persist within plastic and reconstructive surgery, disproportionately impacting patient populations based on social determinants of health. These disparities contribute to delayed treatment, higher complication rates, and worse aesthetic and functional outcomes, ultimately affecting quality of life and patient well-being. While progress has been made in identifying these inequities, there remains a need for targeted research to design, implement, and assess interventions that directly address these disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of recent PRS literature to evaluate the proportion of studies focused on identifying, understanding, and addressing disparities. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search identified national studies published since 2019 that addressed healthcare disparities specific to PRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 173 studies included, 81.5% focused on identifying disparities, while only 10.4% aimed to understand causative factors, and an additional 8.10% implemented interventions to reduce disparities. Disparities were most reported in breast surgery, followed by general reconstruction and non-breast microsurgery, with minority racial groups, lower socioeconomic status, and women experiencing the greatest burden of inequity. Most studies evaluated barriers such as treatment access, offers of care, and post-surgical complications, yet few studies progressed to implementing solutions that address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To achieve meaningful progress, PRS disparities research must move beyond identifying inequities to actively reducing them through evidence-based interventions, policy initiatives, and patient-centered care. Addressing these inequities can improve access to treatment, surgical outcomes, and quality of life for underserved populations. By prioritizing actionable solutions, the field of PRS can achieve more equitable healthcare delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在整形和重建手术中,健康差距持续存在,根据健康的社会决定因素对患者群体产生不成比例的影响。这些差异导致延迟治疗、更高的并发症发生率、更差的美学和功能结果,最终影响生活质量和患者福祉。虽然在确定这些不平等方面取得了进展,但仍需要进行有针对性的研究,以设计、实施和评估直接解决这些不平等的干预措施。方法:我们对最近的PRS文献进行了范围综述,以评估专注于识别、理解和解决差异的研究的比例。使用PRISMA-ScR指南,系统搜索了自2019年以来发表的针对PRS特有的医疗差距的国家研究。结果:在纳入的173项研究中,81.5%的研究侧重于识别差异,而只有10.4%的研究旨在了解导致差异的因素,另有8.10%的研究实施了减少差异的干预措施。差异最多的是乳房手术,其次是一般重建和非乳房显微手术,少数种族群体,社会经济地位较低,女性承受的不平等负担最大。大多数研究评估了诸如获得治疗、提供护理和术后并发症等障碍,但很少有研究进展到实施应对这些挑战的解决方案。结论:为了取得有意义的进展,PRS差异研究必须超越识别不平等,通过循证干预、政策举措和以患者为中心的护理积极减少不平等。解决这些不公平现象可以改善服务不足人群获得治疗的机会、手术结果和生活质量。通过优先考虑可行的解决方案,PRS领域可以实现更公平的医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery.

Introduction: Health disparities persist within plastic and reconstructive surgery, disproportionately impacting patient populations based on social determinants of health. These disparities contribute to delayed treatment, higher complication rates, and worse aesthetic and functional outcomes, ultimately affecting quality of life and patient well-being. While progress has been made in identifying these inequities, there remains a need for targeted research to design, implement, and assess interventions that directly address these disparities.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of recent PRS literature to evaluate the proportion of studies focused on identifying, understanding, and addressing disparities. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search identified national studies published since 2019 that addressed healthcare disparities specific to PRS.

Results: Of the 173 studies included, 81.5% focused on identifying disparities, while only 10.4% aimed to understand causative factors, and an additional 8.10% implemented interventions to reduce disparities. Disparities were most reported in breast surgery, followed by general reconstruction and non-breast microsurgery, with minority racial groups, lower socioeconomic status, and women experiencing the greatest burden of inequity. Most studies evaluated barriers such as treatment access, offers of care, and post-surgical complications, yet few studies progressed to implementing solutions that address these challenges.

Conclusion: To achieve meaningful progress, PRS disparities research must move beyond identifying inequities to actively reducing them through evidence-based interventions, policy initiatives, and patient-centered care. Addressing these inequities can improve access to treatment, surgical outcomes, and quality of life for underserved populations. By prioritizing actionable solutions, the field of PRS can achieve more equitable healthcare delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信