类风湿关节炎患者全踝关节置换术后的并发症发生率和功能结局。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Colleen M Wixted, Albert T Anastasio, Billy I Kim, James K DeOrio, James A Nunley, Mark E Easley, Samuel B Adams
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者全踝关节置换术后的并发症发生率和功能结局。","authors":"Colleen M Wixted, Albert T Anastasio, Billy I Kim, James K DeOrio, James A Nunley, Mark E Easley, Samuel B Adams","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), conflicting data have been reported regarding complications and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement when compared with patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and PROs among patients with RA, primary OA, or posttraumatic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 1,071 primary TAAs performed at a single institution between March 2000 and October 2020. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients were stratified by indication for TAA (OA, n = 372; posttraumatic arthritis, n = 642; RA, n = 57). Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and PRO measures were compared among the groups using univariable statistics. Cox regression was performed to assess the risk of implant failure. The overall cohort had a mean age of 63.4 years, 51.3% were male, and 94.8% were White. The mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 5.7 ± 3.1 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups, the RA cohort had the lowest mean age (p < 0.001), lowest percentage of males (p < 0.001), and highest American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p < 0.001). Univariable analysis showed no significant difference in the infection rate among the groups (p = 1.0). The RA cohort had the highest rate of heterotopic ossification postoperatively (2 of 57, 3.5%; p < 0.040). Cox regression analysis showed no increased risk of implant failure for the RA cohort (p = 0.08 versus the OA cohort, 0.14 versus the posttraumatic arthritis cohort). For the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Short Form (SF)-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)-symptoms subscale, and FAOS-activities of daily living subscale, the RA group reported significantly worse scores in the postoperative period (p < 0.001). However, the RA cohort demonstrated improvements in all PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest single-institution study to date, patients with RA reported poorer PRO scores compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups but experienced functional outcome improvement from the preoperative baseline.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complication Rates and Functional Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Colleen M Wixted, Albert T Anastasio, Billy I Kim, James K DeOrio, James A Nunley, Mark E Easley, Samuel B Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.24.00048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), conflicting data have been reported regarding complications and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement when compared with patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and PROs among patients with RA, primary OA, or posttraumatic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 1,071 primary TAAs performed at a single institution between March 2000 and October 2020. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients were stratified by indication for TAA (OA, n = 372; posttraumatic arthritis, n = 642; RA, n = 57). Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and PRO measures were compared among the groups using univariable statistics. Cox regression was performed to assess the risk of implant failure. The overall cohort had a mean age of 63.4 years, 51.3% were male, and 94.8% were White. The mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 5.7 ± 3.1 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups, the RA cohort had the lowest mean age (p < 0.001), lowest percentage of males (p < 0.001), and highest American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p < 0.001). Univariable analysis showed no significant difference in the infection rate among the groups (p = 1.0). The RA cohort had the highest rate of heterotopic ossification postoperatively (2 of 57, 3.5%; p < 0.040). Cox regression analysis showed no increased risk of implant failure for the RA cohort (p = 0.08 versus the OA cohort, 0.14 versus the posttraumatic arthritis cohort). For the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Short Form (SF)-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)-symptoms subscale, and FAOS-activities of daily living subscale, the RA group reported significantly worse scores in the postoperative period (p < 0.001). However, the RA cohort demonstrated improvements in all PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the largest single-institution study to date, patients with RA reported poorer PRO scores compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups but experienced functional outcome improvement from the preoperative baseline.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于接受全踝关节置换术(TAA)的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者,与骨关节炎(OA)患者相比,关于并发症和患者报告的预后(PRO)改善的数据相互矛盾。本研究的目的是比较RA、原发性OA或创伤后关节炎患者的并发症发生率和PROs。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及2000年3月至2020年10月在一家机构进行的1071例初级TAAs。最小随访时间为2年。根据适应症对患者进行分层(OA, n = 372;创伤后关节炎,n = 642;RA, n = 57)。采用单变量统计比较各组患者人口统计学、术中变量、术后并发症和PRO指标。采用Cox回归评估种植体失败的风险。整个队列的平均年龄为63.4岁,51.3%为男性,94.8%为白人。平均随访时间(及标准差)为5.7±3.1年。结果:与OA组和创伤后关节炎组相比,RA组的平均年龄最低(p < 0.001),男性比例最低(p < 0.001),美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分最高(p < 0.001)。单变量分析结果显示,两组间感染率差异无统计学意义(p = 1.0)。RA组术后异位骨化率最高(57例中2例,3.5%;P < 0.040)。Cox回归分析显示,RA组植入失败的风险没有增加(与OA组相比p = 0.08,与创伤后关节炎组相比p = 0.14)。对于短肌骨骼功能评估(SMFA)、短形式(SF)-36、足踝关节结局评分(FAOS)-症状亚量表和FAOS-日常生活活动亚量表,RA组在术后期间的评分明显较差(p < 0.001)。然而,RA组在所有PROs方面都有改善。结论:在迄今为止最大的单机构研究中,与OA和创伤后关节炎组相比,RA患者报告的PRO评分较低,但功能结果较术前基线有所改善。证据等级:治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complication Rates and Functional Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Background: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), conflicting data have been reported regarding complications and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement when compared with patients with osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates and PROs among patients with RA, primary OA, or posttraumatic arthritis.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 1,071 primary TAAs performed at a single institution between March 2000 and October 2020. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients were stratified by indication for TAA (OA, n = 372; posttraumatic arthritis, n = 642; RA, n = 57). Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and PRO measures were compared among the groups using univariable statistics. Cox regression was performed to assess the risk of implant failure. The overall cohort had a mean age of 63.4 years, 51.3% were male, and 94.8% were White. The mean duration of follow-up (and standard deviation) was 5.7 ± 3.1 years.

Results: Compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups, the RA cohort had the lowest mean age (p < 0.001), lowest percentage of males (p < 0.001), and highest American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p < 0.001). Univariable analysis showed no significant difference in the infection rate among the groups (p = 1.0). The RA cohort had the highest rate of heterotopic ossification postoperatively (2 of 57, 3.5%; p < 0.040). Cox regression analysis showed no increased risk of implant failure for the RA cohort (p = 0.08 versus the OA cohort, 0.14 versus the posttraumatic arthritis cohort). For the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Short Form (SF)-36, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)-symptoms subscale, and FAOS-activities of daily living subscale, the RA group reported significantly worse scores in the postoperative period (p < 0.001). However, the RA cohort demonstrated improvements in all PROs.

Conclusions: In the largest single-institution study to date, patients with RA reported poorer PRO scores compared with the OA and posttraumatic arthritis groups but experienced functional outcome improvement from the preoperative baseline.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信