气候,植被,人类:在不同的时间尺度上解开对火灾的控制。

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Sandy P Harrison, Olivia Haas, Patrick J Bartlein, Luke Sweeney, Guoxi Zhang
{"title":"气候,植被,人类:在不同的时间尺度上解开对火灾的控制。","authors":"Sandy P Harrison, Olivia Haas, Patrick J Bartlein, Luke Sweeney, Guoxi Zhang","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human activities have a major impact on fire regimes. Human activities that cause landscape fragmentation, such as creating roads and other infrastructure or converting areas to agriculture, tend to restrict, rather than promote, fire. The human influence is complex, however, and the impact of fragmentation on the fire regime depends on climate and vegetation conditions. Climate-induced changes in vegetation and fuel loads also affect the natural fire regime in ways independent of human influence. Disentangling the controls of fire regimes is challenging because of the multiple interactions between climate, vegetation, people and fire, and the different timescales over which they operate. We explore these relationships, drawing on statistical and modelling analyses of palaeoenvironmental, historical and recent observations at regional to global scales. We show how these relationships have changed through time and how they vary spatially as a function of environmental and biotic gradients. Specifically, we show that climate and climate-driven changes in vegetation have been the most important drivers of changing fire regimes at least until the Industrial Revolution. Statistical and modelling analyses show no discernible impact of hunter-gatherer communities, and even the time-transgressive introduction of agriculture during the Neolithic had no impact on fire regimes at a regional scale. The post-industrial expansion of agriculture was an important influence on fires, but since the late 19th century, the overwhelming influence of humans has been to reduce fire through progressive landscape fragmentation rather than through influencing ignitions. Model projections suggest that the reduction of fire through fragmentation will be outweighed by climatically driven increases by the end of the 21st century.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1924","pages":"20230464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate, vegetation, people: disentangling the controls of fire at different timescales.\",\"authors\":\"Sandy P Harrison, Olivia Haas, Patrick J Bartlein, Luke Sweeney, Guoxi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rstb.2023.0464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human activities have a major impact on fire regimes. Human activities that cause landscape fragmentation, such as creating roads and other infrastructure or converting areas to agriculture, tend to restrict, rather than promote, fire. The human influence is complex, however, and the impact of fragmentation on the fire regime depends on climate and vegetation conditions. Climate-induced changes in vegetation and fuel loads also affect the natural fire regime in ways independent of human influence. Disentangling the controls of fire regimes is challenging because of the multiple interactions between climate, vegetation, people and fire, and the different timescales over which they operate. We explore these relationships, drawing on statistical and modelling analyses of palaeoenvironmental, historical and recent observations at regional to global scales. We show how these relationships have changed through time and how they vary spatially as a function of environmental and biotic gradients. Specifically, we show that climate and climate-driven changes in vegetation have been the most important drivers of changing fire regimes at least until the Industrial Revolution. Statistical and modelling analyses show no discernible impact of hunter-gatherer communities, and even the time-transgressive introduction of agriculture during the Neolithic had no impact on fire regimes at a regional scale. The post-industrial expansion of agriculture was an important influence on fires, but since the late 19th century, the overwhelming influence of humans has been to reduce fire through progressive landscape fragmentation rather than through influencing ignitions. Model projections suggest that the reduction of fire through fragmentation will be outweighed by climatically driven increases by the end of the 21st century.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"380 1924\",\"pages\":\"20230464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004104/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类活动对火灾状况有重大影响。导致景观破碎的人类活动,如修建道路和其他基础设施或将地区转为农业,往往会限制而不是促进火灾的发生。然而,人类的影响是复杂的,破碎化对火情的影响取决于气候和植被条件。气候引起的植被和燃料负荷变化也以不受人类影响的方式影响自然火灾状况。由于气候、植被、人类和火灾之间的多重相互作用,以及它们运行的不同时间尺度,解开对火灾制度的控制是具有挑战性的。我们通过对区域到全球范围内的古环境、历史和近期观测数据进行统计和建模分析,探索了这些关系。我们展示了这些关系如何随着时间的推移而变化,以及它们如何作为环境和生物梯度的函数在空间上变化。具体来说,我们表明,至少在工业革命之前,气候和气候驱动的植被变化一直是改变火灾制度的最重要驱动因素。统计和模型分析显示,狩猎采集者社区没有明显的影响,甚至新石器时代农业的引入也没有对区域范围内的火灾制度产生影响。农业的后工业化扩张对火灾产生了重要影响,但自19世纪后期以来,人类的压倒性影响是通过逐渐的景观破碎化而不是通过影响点火来减少火灾。模式预测表明,到21世纪末,气候驱动的火灾增加将超过破碎化造成的火灾减少。本文是“气候变化和人类影响下的新型火灾制度:影响、生态系统响应和反馈”主题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Climate, vegetation, people: disentangling the controls of fire at different timescales.

Human activities have a major impact on fire regimes. Human activities that cause landscape fragmentation, such as creating roads and other infrastructure or converting areas to agriculture, tend to restrict, rather than promote, fire. The human influence is complex, however, and the impact of fragmentation on the fire regime depends on climate and vegetation conditions. Climate-induced changes in vegetation and fuel loads also affect the natural fire regime in ways independent of human influence. Disentangling the controls of fire regimes is challenging because of the multiple interactions between climate, vegetation, people and fire, and the different timescales over which they operate. We explore these relationships, drawing on statistical and modelling analyses of palaeoenvironmental, historical and recent observations at regional to global scales. We show how these relationships have changed through time and how they vary spatially as a function of environmental and biotic gradients. Specifically, we show that climate and climate-driven changes in vegetation have been the most important drivers of changing fire regimes at least until the Industrial Revolution. Statistical and modelling analyses show no discernible impact of hunter-gatherer communities, and even the time-transgressive introduction of agriculture during the Neolithic had no impact on fire regimes at a regional scale. The post-industrial expansion of agriculture was an important influence on fires, but since the late 19th century, the overwhelming influence of humans has been to reduce fire through progressive landscape fragmentation rather than through influencing ignitions. Model projections suggest that the reduction of fire through fragmentation will be outweighed by climatically driven increases by the end of the 21st century.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信