椎板成形术后后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)体积进展的风险。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Qu Ruomu, Qin Siyuan, Wang Ben, Zhao Yanbin, Pan Shengfa, Chen Xin, Liu Zhongjun, Jiang Liang, Lang Ning, Zhou Feifei
{"title":"椎板成形术后后纵韧带骨化(OPLL)体积进展的风险。","authors":"Qu Ruomu, Qin Siyuan, Wang Ben, Zhao Yanbin, Pan Shengfa, Chen Xin, Liu Zhongjun, Jiang Liang, Lang Ning, Zhou Feifei","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Progression of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after laminoplasty (LP) can lead to recurrent compression of the spinal cord, neurological progression, and possibly revision surgery. Continuity of OPLL across segments, termed true continuous segments (TCS), has been previously found to help maintaining lordosis after LP. However, the impact of TCS on post-LP OPLL volume progression remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the influence of TCS in post-LP OPLL volume progression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients who underwent LP during 2006-2017 and had preoperative computed tomography (CT) and a minimum five year CT follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Progression of OPLL volume as measured on CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative CT images were assessed, dividing patients into TCS and non-TCS groups. The demographics, preoperative segments of OPLL were recorded. As per the previously described classification, TCS was recorded as I (continuous type OPLL on disc space spanning the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies for more than half of their height without any bony crack regardless of bridge formation between vertebral bodies), II (OPLL adherent to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging) or III (obvious interbody auto-fusion), and the TCS II and III were defined as true bridging segments (TBS). The number of disc levels which have a TCS was documented as the TCS counts. OPLL volume was calculated by manually segmenting images using 3D slicers (Figure 2). OPLL annual volume progression rate (AVPR) was calculated by the volume change of OPLL divided by follow-up period. An AVPR greater than 5% was defined as OPLL progression. The AVPR of both groups were compared. Multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to account for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 patients (33 males and 23 females) were included in this study, with a mean age of 53.2±8.7. The average CT follow-up durations were 95.1±33.8 months. The preoperative OPLL segments of non-TCS and TCS groups were 2.9±1.0 and 4.4±1.3 (p<0.001) and the preoperative volume of non-TCS and TCS groups were 986.3±603.7 and 3512.1±1909.8mm<sup>3</sup> (p<0.001), respectively. At final follow-up, the AVPR of non-TCS and TCS groups were 12.7%±18.2% and 5.9%±4.7% (p=0.393), respectively. Nineteen (54.3%) patients in the non-TCS group and 10 (47.6%) patients in the TCS group showed OPLL progression (p=0.632). Correlation analysis revealed that the TCS Type I counts did not present significant correlation with AVPR, while preoperative CL (p=0.021), TBS counts (p=0.029) and age (p=0.001) significantly negatively correlated with AVPR. Multivariable logistics analysis results revealed that more TBS counts (OR=0.095, p=0.026) and higher age (OR=0.894, p=0.019) are associated with lower risk of post-LP OPLL progression, and the AUC of model was 0.816. Subgroup analysis showed patients with TBS have significant lower OPLL progression ratio and AVPR than the patients with TCS type I.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TBS counts were negatively associated with OPLL annual volume progression rate and OPLL progression risk following LP, while TCS type I counts did not show significant impact on post-LP OPLL progression. TBS should be identified and considered when planning LP for OPLL.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) volume progression following laminoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Qu Ruomu, Qin Siyuan, Wang Ben, Zhao Yanbin, Pan Shengfa, Chen Xin, Liu Zhongjun, Jiang Liang, Lang Ning, Zhou Feifei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Progression of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after laminoplasty (LP) can lead to recurrent compression of the spinal cord, neurological progression, and possibly revision surgery. Continuity of OPLL across segments, termed true continuous segments (TCS), has been previously found to help maintaining lordosis after LP. However, the impact of TCS on post-LP OPLL volume progression remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the influence of TCS in post-LP OPLL volume progression.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients who underwent LP during 2006-2017 and had preoperative computed tomography (CT) and a minimum five year CT follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Progression of OPLL volume as measured on CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative CT images were assessed, dividing patients into TCS and non-TCS groups. The demographics, preoperative segments of OPLL were recorded. As per the previously described classification, TCS was recorded as I (continuous type OPLL on disc space spanning the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies for more than half of their height without any bony crack regardless of bridge formation between vertebral bodies), II (OPLL adherent to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging) or III (obvious interbody auto-fusion), and the TCS II and III were defined as true bridging segments (TBS). The number of disc levels which have a TCS was documented as the TCS counts. OPLL volume was calculated by manually segmenting images using 3D slicers (Figure 2). OPLL annual volume progression rate (AVPR) was calculated by the volume change of OPLL divided by follow-up period. An AVPR greater than 5% was defined as OPLL progression. The AVPR of both groups were compared. Multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to account for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 56 patients (33 males and 23 females) were included in this study, with a mean age of 53.2±8.7. The average CT follow-up durations were 95.1±33.8 months. The preoperative OPLL segments of non-TCS and TCS groups were 2.9±1.0 and 4.4±1.3 (p<0.001) and the preoperative volume of non-TCS and TCS groups were 986.3±603.7 and 3512.1±1909.8mm<sup>3</sup> (p<0.001), respectively. At final follow-up, the AVPR of non-TCS and TCS groups were 12.7%±18.2% and 5.9%±4.7% (p=0.393), respectively. Nineteen (54.3%) patients in the non-TCS group and 10 (47.6%) patients in the TCS group showed OPLL progression (p=0.632). Correlation analysis revealed that the TCS Type I counts did not present significant correlation with AVPR, while preoperative CL (p=0.021), TBS counts (p=0.029) and age (p=0.001) significantly negatively correlated with AVPR. Multivariable logistics analysis results revealed that more TBS counts (OR=0.095, p=0.026) and higher age (OR=0.894, p=0.019) are associated with lower risk of post-LP OPLL progression, and the AUC of model was 0.816. Subgroup analysis showed patients with TBS have significant lower OPLL progression ratio and AVPR than the patients with TCS type I.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TBS counts were negatively associated with OPLL annual volume progression rate and OPLL progression risk following LP, while TCS type I counts did not show significant impact on post-LP OPLL progression. TBS should be identified and considered when planning LP for OPLL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景背景:椎板成形术(LP)后后纵韧带骨化的进展可导致脊髓复发性压迫,神经系统进展,并可能进行翻修手术。OPLL跨节段的连续性,称为真正的连续节段(TCS),以前发现有助于维持LP后的前凸。然而,TCS对lp后OPLL体积进展的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨TCS对lp后OPLL体积进展的影响。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。患者样本:2006-2017年期间接受LP治疗并进行术前计算机断层扫描(CT)和至少5年CT随访的患者。结果测量:CT测量上睑下垂体积进展情况。方法:评估术前CT图像,将患者分为TCS组和非TCS组。记录患者的人口统计学特征、术前OPLL节段。根据前面描述的分类,TCS被记录为I(连续型OPLL在椎间盘间隙跨越上下相邻椎体超过其高度的一半而不存在任何骨裂,无论椎体之间是否形成桥接),II (OPLL通过桥接同时附着在上下相邻椎体上)或III(明显的椎间自动融合),并将TCS II和III定义为真正的桥接节段(TBS)。有TCS的磁盘级别的数量被记录为TCS计数。通过使用3D切片器手动分割图像来计算OPLL体积(图2)。用OPLL体积变化除以随访时间计算OPLL年体积进展率(AVPR)。AVPR大于5%定义为OPLL进展。比较两组患者的AVPR。进行多变量逻辑分析以解释混杂因素。结果:共纳入56例患者,其中男性33例,女性23例,平均年龄53.2±8.7岁。CT随访时间平均为95.1±33.8个月。非TCS组和TCS组术前OPLL节段分别为2.9±1.0和4.4±1.3 (p3)。结论:TBS计数与OPLL年体积进展率和LP术后OPLL进展风险呈负相关,而TCS I型计数对LP后OPLL进展无显著影响。在规划OPLL的LP时,应确定并考虑TBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) volume progression following laminoplasty.

Background context: Progression of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) after laminoplasty (LP) can lead to recurrent compression of the spinal cord, neurological progression, and possibly revision surgery. Continuity of OPLL across segments, termed true continuous segments (TCS), has been previously found to help maintaining lordosis after LP. However, the impact of TCS on post-LP OPLL volume progression remains unknown.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of TCS in post-LP OPLL volume progression.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: Patients who underwent LP during 2006-2017 and had preoperative computed tomography (CT) and a minimum five year CT follow-ups.

Outcome measures: Progression of OPLL volume as measured on CT.

Methods: Preoperative CT images were assessed, dividing patients into TCS and non-TCS groups. The demographics, preoperative segments of OPLL were recorded. As per the previously described classification, TCS was recorded as I (continuous type OPLL on disc space spanning the upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies for more than half of their height without any bony crack regardless of bridge formation between vertebral bodies), II (OPLL adherent to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging) or III (obvious interbody auto-fusion), and the TCS II and III were defined as true bridging segments (TBS). The number of disc levels which have a TCS was documented as the TCS counts. OPLL volume was calculated by manually segmenting images using 3D slicers (Figure 2). OPLL annual volume progression rate (AVPR) was calculated by the volume change of OPLL divided by follow-up period. An AVPR greater than 5% was defined as OPLL progression. The AVPR of both groups were compared. Multivariable logistic analysis was conducted to account for confounders.

Results: A total of 56 patients (33 males and 23 females) were included in this study, with a mean age of 53.2±8.7. The average CT follow-up durations were 95.1±33.8 months. The preoperative OPLL segments of non-TCS and TCS groups were 2.9±1.0 and 4.4±1.3 (p<0.001) and the preoperative volume of non-TCS and TCS groups were 986.3±603.7 and 3512.1±1909.8mm3 (p<0.001), respectively. At final follow-up, the AVPR of non-TCS and TCS groups were 12.7%±18.2% and 5.9%±4.7% (p=0.393), respectively. Nineteen (54.3%) patients in the non-TCS group and 10 (47.6%) patients in the TCS group showed OPLL progression (p=0.632). Correlation analysis revealed that the TCS Type I counts did not present significant correlation with AVPR, while preoperative CL (p=0.021), TBS counts (p=0.029) and age (p=0.001) significantly negatively correlated with AVPR. Multivariable logistics analysis results revealed that more TBS counts (OR=0.095, p=0.026) and higher age (OR=0.894, p=0.019) are associated with lower risk of post-LP OPLL progression, and the AUC of model was 0.816. Subgroup analysis showed patients with TBS have significant lower OPLL progression ratio and AVPR than the patients with TCS type I.

Conclusion: TBS counts were negatively associated with OPLL annual volume progression rate and OPLL progression risk following LP, while TCS type I counts did not show significant impact on post-LP OPLL progression. TBS should be identified and considered when planning LP for OPLL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信