机器人导航脊柱手术中髂后上棘参考阵列放置的准确性。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Joseph J Y Wan, Qing H Tan, Dalun Leong, Zhihong Chew, Terry H L Teo
{"title":"机器人导航脊柱手术中髂后上棘参考阵列放置的准确性。","authors":"Joseph J Y Wan, Qing H Tan, Dalun Leong, Zhihong Chew, Terry H L Teo","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2025-0006.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Computer-navigated spinal instrumentation requires placement of a dynamic reference base (DRB), typically intraosseously in the ilium via a percutaneous stab incision on the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) entry point. Data describing the accuracy and complications of DRB placement are limited in the literature. The aim of this study is to measure the accuracy of DRB placement in the PSIS, determine its exact placement trajectory, and determine the prevalence of related complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, institutional board approved, multisurgeon retrospective analysis of 69 included DRB placements from 51 robot-assisted lumbar posterior instrumentation procedures between May 2022 and April 2024. Pin entry point and trajectory were mapped out; the intraoperative O-arm CT scans and skin-to-PSIS depth were also measured, and patient demographics (age, sex, BMI), surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 69 PSIS pin placements, 47 (68.1%) had the correct entry point on the PSIS, and 35 (50.7%) of them were placed correctly within the ilium without breaching a second cortex. Skin-to-PSIS depth was significantly higher in patients with misplaced DRB placement, while age, sex, and BMI were similar. Of those with misplaced DRB (n = 34), one had delayed pin site wound healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous PSIS DRB placement has poor accuracy, with skin-to-PSIS depth being a significant factor. To avoid complications from misplaced DRB placement, the authors recommend the use of DRB placement on the iliac wing, or on the PSIS, following the trajectory used in pelvis posterior column fracture fixation, using fluoroscopy intraoperatively to ensure the DRB pin position.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 5","pages":"528-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of posterosuperior iliac spine reference array placement in robot-navigated spine surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph J Y Wan, Qing H Tan, Dalun Leong, Zhihong Chew, Terry H L Teo\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2025-0006.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Computer-navigated spinal instrumentation requires placement of a dynamic reference base (DRB), typically intraosseously in the ilium via a percutaneous stab incision on the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) entry point. Data describing the accuracy and complications of DRB placement are limited in the literature. The aim of this study is to measure the accuracy of DRB placement in the PSIS, determine its exact placement trajectory, and determine the prevalence of related complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, institutional board approved, multisurgeon retrospective analysis of 69 included DRB placements from 51 robot-assisted lumbar posterior instrumentation procedures between May 2022 and April 2024. Pin entry point and trajectory were mapped out; the intraoperative O-arm CT scans and skin-to-PSIS depth were also measured, and patient demographics (age, sex, BMI), surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 69 PSIS pin placements, 47 (68.1%) had the correct entry point on the PSIS, and 35 (50.7%) of them were placed correctly within the ilium without breaching a second cortex. Skin-to-PSIS depth was significantly higher in patients with misplaced DRB placement, while age, sex, and BMI were similar. Of those with misplaced DRB (n = 34), one had delayed pin site wound healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous PSIS DRB placement has poor accuracy, with skin-to-PSIS depth being a significant factor. To avoid complications from misplaced DRB placement, the authors recommend the use of DRB placement on the iliac wing, or on the PSIS, following the trajectory used in pelvis posterior column fracture fixation, using fluoroscopy intraoperatively to ensure the DRB pin position.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"528-534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2025-0006.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.65.BJO-2025-0006.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:计算机导航脊柱内固定需要放置动态参考底座(DRB),通常通过经皮刺切髂后上棘(PSIS)入口点在髂骨内置入。文献中描述DRB放置的准确性和并发症的数据有限。本研究的目的是测量DRB在PSIS内放置的准确性,确定其确切的放置轨迹,并确定相关并发症的发生率。方法:这是一项单中心、机构委员会批准的多外科医生回顾性分析,包括2022年5月至2024年4月期间51例机器人辅助腰椎后路内固定手术中的69例DRB放置。绘制销钉进入点和轨迹;测量术中o臂CT扫描和皮肤到psis的深度,并记录患者人口统计学(年龄、性别、BMI)、手术结果和术后并发症。结果:在69例PSIS针置入中,47例(68.1%)在PSIS上有正确的进入点,35例(50.7%)在髂骨内没有破坏第二皮质。DRB放置错位的患者皮肤到psis的深度明显更高,而年龄、性别和BMI相似。在DRB错位的患者中(n = 34), 1例针位伤口愈合延迟。结论:经皮PSIS DRB放置准确性较差,皮肤到PSIS的深度是重要因素。为了避免DRB放置错位的并发症,作者建议将DRB放置在髂翼或PSIS上,遵循骨盆后柱骨折固定的轨迹,术中使用透视检查确保DRB钉的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of posterosuperior iliac spine reference array placement in robot-navigated spine surgery.

Aims: Computer-navigated spinal instrumentation requires placement of a dynamic reference base (DRB), typically intraosseously in the ilium via a percutaneous stab incision on the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) entry point. Data describing the accuracy and complications of DRB placement are limited in the literature. The aim of this study is to measure the accuracy of DRB placement in the PSIS, determine its exact placement trajectory, and determine the prevalence of related complications.

Methods: This is a single-centre, institutional board approved, multisurgeon retrospective analysis of 69 included DRB placements from 51 robot-assisted lumbar posterior instrumentation procedures between May 2022 and April 2024. Pin entry point and trajectory were mapped out; the intraoperative O-arm CT scans and skin-to-PSIS depth were also measured, and patient demographics (age, sex, BMI), surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: Of the 69 PSIS pin placements, 47 (68.1%) had the correct entry point on the PSIS, and 35 (50.7%) of them were placed correctly within the ilium without breaching a second cortex. Skin-to-PSIS depth was significantly higher in patients with misplaced DRB placement, while age, sex, and BMI were similar. Of those with misplaced DRB (n = 34), one had delayed pin site wound healing.

Conclusion: Percutaneous PSIS DRB placement has poor accuracy, with skin-to-PSIS depth being a significant factor. To avoid complications from misplaced DRB placement, the authors recommend the use of DRB placement on the iliac wing, or on the PSIS, following the trajectory used in pelvis posterior column fracture fixation, using fluoroscopy intraoperatively to ensure the DRB pin position.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信