FcRn抑制剂Efgartigimod和rozanolizumab治疗重症肌无力的实际经验：多周期给药和从静脉注射到皮下注射的过渡。
IF 3.9
3区 医学
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
引用次数: 0
摘要
新生儿Fc受体（FcRn）抑制剂efgartigimod和rozanolizumab用于治疗广泛性重症肌无力（MG）的时间并不长；因此，在多个周期内给药和从静脉注射到皮下注射的现实证据仍然不足。方法：我们回顾性评估了17例连续接受FcRn抑制剂治疗的广泛性MG患者。结果：所有患者最初接受静脉注射依加替莫德制剂。在17例患者中，10例（59%）被认为有反应，定义为在第一个治疗周期中MG日常生活活动评分连续至少四周持续改善至少2分。在第一个周期中，4名无反应者在第二周期中表现出改善，以满足反应者的标准。其中一名患有胸腺瘤转移病变的患者在第一个治疗周期内MG症状明显恶化。5名患者从静脉注射改为皮下注射，所有患者均获得成功。皮下制剂的疗效与静脉制剂相似，即使在从efgartigimod切换到rozanolizumab的患者中也是如此。药物耐受性良好，没有任何与药物相关的严重不良事件，无论制剂类型如何。结论：FcRn抑制剂对全身性MG患者有效且安全，但其疗效可能取决于治疗期间的疾病活动度。从静脉注射剂型到更方便的皮下注射剂型的转变是成功的，这表明未来对皮下注射剂型的需求可能会增长。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Experience with FcRn Inhibitors Efgartigimod and Rozanolixizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: Administration in Multiple Cycles and Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Formulation.
Introduction: The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab have not long been introduced for treating generalized myasthenia gravis (MG); hence, real-world evidence for their administration in multiple cycles and switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation remains insufficient.
Methods: We retrospectively assessed 17 consecutive patients with generalized MG and diverse backgrounds who were treated with FcRn inhibitors.
Results: All patients initially received an intravenous efgartigimod formulation. Of 17 patients, 10 (59%) were considered responders, defined as a persistent improvement of at least two points for a minimum of four consecutive weeks in the MG activities of daily living score during the first treatment cycle. Four of the non-responders in the first cycle demonstrated an improvement in fulfilling the criteria for responders in the second cycle. One of these patients, who had thymoma metastatic lesions, experienced a significant worsening of MG symptoms during the first treatment cycle. Five patients switched from intravenous to subcutaneous formulations, which was successful in all patients. The efficacy of the subcutaneous formulations was similar to that of the intravenous formulation, even in patients who switched from efgartigimod to rozanolixizumab. The drugs were well tolerated without any drug-related serious adverse events irrespective of the formulation type.
Conclusion: FcRn inhibitors were effective and safe in patients with generalized MG, but their efficacy may depend on the disease activity during treatment. The transition from the intravenous formulation to more convenient subcutaneous formulations was successful, indicating the likely growth of future demand for subcutaneous formulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍：
Aims and Scope
Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice.
Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
Rapid Publication
The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice.
Open Access
All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access.
Personal Service
The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts.
Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries
Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’.
For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/
Publication Fees
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis.
Peer Review Process
Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria.
At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate.
Preprints
We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals.
Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550
Copyright
Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.
Contact
For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
