放射暴露后连续血糖监测系统的真实世界准确性。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pediatric Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/2210509
Siobhan Tellez, Lindsey Hornung, Emily Smith, Andrew Trout, Samuel Brady, Colleen Lowe, Joshua Courter, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Deborah Elder
{"title":"放射暴露后连续血糖监测系统的真实世界准确性。","authors":"Siobhan Tellez, Lindsey Hornung, Emily Smith, Andrew Trout, Samuel Brady, Colleen Lowe, Joshua Courter, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Deborah Elder","doi":"10.1155/2024/2210509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) necessitates a review of variables that impact accuracy and interrupt use. Manufacturer recommendations include removing CGMs before diagnostic imaging, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Early removal and replacement of CGM components present financial, clinical, and psychosocial burdens to the wearer and interrupt optimal management of diabetes for pediatric patients who receive a total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). The study's aim was to evaluate the effect of scatter dose exposure during X-ray or CT if the CGM remained intact but outside the field of view (FoV).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants were followed through the first 3 months after TPIAT surgery, managed diabetes with an insulin pump and CGM, and were routinely exposed to diagnostic imaging. Participants' CGMs were unshielded by a protective apron during any X-ray or CT procedures for the duration of the study period, and the transmitter was collected after expiration or removal. Glucometer data was collected from hospital records and home glucometer downloads. Mixed models were used to analyze absolute differences between matched CGM and glucometer values, and Clarke error grid analyses (EGA) were performed. Scatter dose exposure was derived using anthropomorphic phantoms and calculated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (median 12.2 years, 64% female) received a median of five diagnostic imaging procedures with a median cumulative scatter dose of 559 <i>µ</i>Gy. The absolute difference between the CGM and glucometer values was not significantly associated with the cumulative scatter dose (<i>p</i>=0.17) or time from TPIAT (<i>p</i>=0.24) when analyzed in a mixed model. Regardless of scatter dose exposure, time from TPIAT, or glucometer, ≥98% of glucose values fell within zones A and B on EGA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scatter dose exposure from diagnostic imaging did not affect the clinical accuracy of CGM values for the duration of transmitter use. Leaving CGM components in place when not in the FoV during diagnostic imaging successfully mitigated interruptions to use and undue burden or cost to participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"2210509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System after Radiologic Exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan Tellez, Lindsey Hornung, Emily Smith, Andrew Trout, Samuel Brady, Colleen Lowe, Joshua Courter, Maisam Abu-El-Haija, Deborah Elder\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2210509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) necessitates a review of variables that impact accuracy and interrupt use. Manufacturer recommendations include removing CGMs before diagnostic imaging, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Early removal and replacement of CGM components present financial, clinical, and psychosocial burdens to the wearer and interrupt optimal management of diabetes for pediatric patients who receive a total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). The study's aim was to evaluate the effect of scatter dose exposure during X-ray or CT if the CGM remained intact but outside the field of view (FoV).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants were followed through the first 3 months after TPIAT surgery, managed diabetes with an insulin pump and CGM, and were routinely exposed to diagnostic imaging. Participants' CGMs were unshielded by a protective apron during any X-ray or CT procedures for the duration of the study period, and the transmitter was collected after expiration or removal. Glucometer data was collected from hospital records and home glucometer downloads. Mixed models were used to analyze absolute differences between matched CGM and glucometer values, and Clarke error grid analyses (EGA) were performed. Scatter dose exposure was derived using anthropomorphic phantoms and calculated retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 patients (median 12.2 years, 64% female) received a median of five diagnostic imaging procedures with a median cumulative scatter dose of 559 <i>µ</i>Gy. The absolute difference between the CGM and glucometer values was not significantly associated with the cumulative scatter dose (<i>p</i>=0.17) or time from TPIAT (<i>p</i>=0.24) when analyzed in a mixed model. Regardless of scatter dose exposure, time from TPIAT, or glucometer, ≥98% of glucose values fell within zones A and B on EGA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scatter dose exposure from diagnostic imaging did not affect the clinical accuracy of CGM values for the duration of transmitter use. Leaving CGM components in place when not in the FoV during diagnostic imaging successfully mitigated interruptions to use and undue burden or cost to participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"2210509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2210509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2210509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续血糖监测仪(CGM)的使用越来越多,有必要对影响准确性和中断使用的变量进行审查。制造商建议在诊断成像(如x射线和计算机断层扫描(CT))之前切除cgm。早期移除和替换CGM组件会给佩戴者带来经济、临床和社会心理负担,并影响接受全胰腺切除术合并胰岛自体移植(TPIAT)的儿科患者糖尿病的最佳管理。该研究的目的是评估在x射线或CT期间散射剂量暴露的影响,如果CGM保持完整但在视场(FoV)之外。材料和方法:参与者在TPIAT手术后的前3个月进行随访,使用胰岛素泵和CGM管理糖尿病,并常规接受诊断成像。在研究期间,参与者的cgm在任何x射线或CT检查过程中都没有被防护围裙屏蔽,发射器在过期或移除后收集。血糖仪数据是从医院记录和家用血糖仪下载中收集的。使用混合模型分析匹配的CGM值与血糖仪值之间的绝对差异,并进行Clarke误差网格分析(EGA)。散射剂量暴露采用拟人模型推导并回顾性计算。结果:共有14例患者(中位年龄12.2岁,64%为女性)接受了中位5次诊断性影像学检查,中位累积散射剂量为559µGy。在混合模型中分析时,CGM和血糖仪值之间的绝对差异与TPIAT的累积散射剂量(p=0.17)或时间(p=0.24)没有显著相关。无论分散剂量暴露,TPIAT或血糖仪的时间,≥98%的葡萄糖值落在EGA的A区和B区。结论:在使用发射机期间,诊断成像的散射剂量暴露不影响CGM值的临床准确性。在诊断成像过程中,当CGM组件不在视场内时,将其保留在原位,成功地减轻了使用中断和参与者的不必要负担或成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System after Radiologic Exposure.

Background: The increasing use of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) necessitates a review of variables that impact accuracy and interrupt use. Manufacturer recommendations include removing CGMs before diagnostic imaging, such as X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Early removal and replacement of CGM components present financial, clinical, and psychosocial burdens to the wearer and interrupt optimal management of diabetes for pediatric patients who receive a total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT). The study's aim was to evaluate the effect of scatter dose exposure during X-ray or CT if the CGM remained intact but outside the field of view (FoV).

Materials and methods: Participants were followed through the first 3 months after TPIAT surgery, managed diabetes with an insulin pump and CGM, and were routinely exposed to diagnostic imaging. Participants' CGMs were unshielded by a protective apron during any X-ray or CT procedures for the duration of the study period, and the transmitter was collected after expiration or removal. Glucometer data was collected from hospital records and home glucometer downloads. Mixed models were used to analyze absolute differences between matched CGM and glucometer values, and Clarke error grid analyses (EGA) were performed. Scatter dose exposure was derived using anthropomorphic phantoms and calculated retrospectively.

Results: A total of 14 patients (median 12.2 years, 64% female) received a median of five diagnostic imaging procedures with a median cumulative scatter dose of 559 µGy. The absolute difference between the CGM and glucometer values was not significantly associated with the cumulative scatter dose (p=0.17) or time from TPIAT (p=0.24) when analyzed in a mixed model. Regardless of scatter dose exposure, time from TPIAT, or glucometer, ≥98% of glucose values fell within zones A and B on EGA.

Conclusion: Scatter dose exposure from diagnostic imaging did not affect the clinical accuracy of CGM values for the duration of transmitter use. Leaving CGM components in place when not in the FoV during diagnostic imaging successfully mitigated interruptions to use and undue burden or cost to participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Diabetes
Pediatric Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信